.
Posted on 09/17/2007 8:09:48 AM PDT by qam1
Washington, Sept 17: According to a study done by Temple University researcher Adam Davey, Ph.D., the impact of marital disruptions like divorce, remarriage etc can foretell whether a child would provide more involved care to parents in the future or not.
The changes caused by a divorce that took place 30 years ago can have long lasting effects on the mind of the child, claimed Davey.
In particular, divorce predicted that an adult child would be less involved in the day-to-day aid for the aging parents, in future.
"It's not the divorce itself that affects the quality of the parent-child relationship, but it's what happens afterwards such as geographical separation," said Davey, a gerontologist who studies trends in the baby boomer generation and other aging issues.
Davey scrutinised data from 2,087 parents, aged 50 and above, who gave reports on their 7,019 adult children in the National Survey of Family and Households.
"Marital transitions affect families in a number of ways," Davey said.
"They can interrupt the relationship of support between a parent and child, and the evidence suggests that the continuity of support by parents and to parents matters," he added.
The study also reported that early marital commotion in a child's life can be less detrimental to the relationship, than those which occurred in adulthood.
The results suggest that both the type of changeover and the time of its occurrence in the child's life are important.
A father's early remarriage makes it more likely that the child will provide help later in life, but the same transition occurs when the child has reached adulthood the chances of a child helping the father become less.
Also, if the child spends more time with the divorced mother, the chances of providing assistance to the mother when she is old, are more, Davey said.
Astonishingly, it was found that both mothers and fathers are only half as likely to get support from a non-biological child.
"Society does not yet have a clear set of expectations for step-children's responsibility," Davey said.
Contradictory to the findings, this does not mean these potential effects damage the parent-child relationship as a whole, Davey said.
While marital transition doesn't seem to cause irretrievable damages to the support that children provide to parents in later life, it does disrupt the needs and resources of both generations.
"Given how common marital transitions have become, and how complex families have become as a result, it's surprising that the effects aren't even more pronounced." Davey added.
The findings have appeared in Advances in Life Course Research.
Why are we astonished at this?
“Divorce can predict child’s future day-to-day care for aging parents”
No kidding.
Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
Well, DUH!
.
My parents are divorced, if my dad fell ill it would be difficult for me to be involved in his day to day care, unless I moved him up to where I live... something I doubt he would want. My mother lives close by.
If my father did not fight me relocating him here, I would have no qualms being as active as I could in his care... when he is 600 miles away however, this makes this sort of involvement much more difficult if not impossible.
I think many assume that the government takes care of the elderly.
bttt
Wrong.
Why would anyone personally help strangers in their old age?
duh.
You reap what you sow!
Well, gee, we’re headed for an anything-goes world. On the express train to who-gives-a-crapshoot. Remember, anything you do, all you have to say is, “oops, sorry” and be done with it.
Why are we astonished at this?
Because we live in an age where people think that everything is the same, everything is equal.
Example: Two homosexuals = an hetrosexual couple
Her kids = my kids
DOLTS!
“Half as likely” means that there are some non-biological children (what, are they robots?) who are caring for their step-parent or adoptive parent. The observations of the study are intuitively obvious, but they’re generalizations, not descriptive of every case.
I hear ya. What about kids who don’t know who their parents are?
Studies and polls are amusing sometimes, but I take it with skepticism, like my horoscope...
They weren't part of this study :-).
If they are talking about children that were adopted at birth or shortly thereafter, I would find it astonishing that there is such a disparity in level of support.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.