Article published on the editorial page but not found on opinionjournal.com. This excerpt includes the first, the penultimate, and the last paragraph of the piece.
My comments are:
- Socialism is cheapness. Socialized medicine is cheap medicine. We all desire economy, but socialism is not efficiency but penny wise pound foolishness. Anyone who has cancer wants excellent treatment. Full Stop. And any patriot wants our posterity to pity us for the current limitations of "excellent" health care as much as we pity George Washington and Queen Victoria (whose beloved husband Prince Albert died of an infectious disease "no one" dies from in modern day America) for the limitations of what was the best medical care on offer in their times.
- Socialized medicine is a political issue, and one associated with one particular party in the U.S. Therefore to the extent that the American Cancer Society promotes socialized medicine, the American Cancer Society makes itself a political organization to which donations are not legitimately exempt from Federal income tax.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Government-paid medicine is rationed medicine.
Don’t believe me?
Ask the doctors and their patients in Canada.
Doctors are coming here to work, and the sick are coming here if they need immediate treatment.
But they have “universal health care.”
It’s just universally bad.
2 posted on
09/14/2007 10:04:08 AM PDT by
Redbob
(WWJBD - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
When they start rationing healthcare people will go in for fewer routine cancer screenings. It’s hard enough to get me in to a doctor’s office where I have no wait now. I can’t imagine sitting around for hours when there is nothing in particular bothering me. As a result more people will delay cancer diagnosis and more people will die from it.
3 posted on
09/14/2007 10:04:41 AM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(Take the wheel, Fred.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
the problem with socialism is that its leaders do not subscribe to the rules they impose on the masses. For instance, congress does not subscribe to Social Security. The have their own health program. We need to have a universal program in which the leaders suffer with the masses. Then, they won’t have the program. We need to chant on the streets, we only want the programs our public servants get.
4 posted on
09/14/2007 10:11:18 AM PDT by
LoneRangerMassachusetts
(The only good Mullah is a dead Mullah. The only good Mosque is the one that used to be there.)
To: Gabz; SheLion
5 posted on
09/14/2007 10:12:07 AM PDT by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Instead, the Society will devote this year's entire advertising budget to a campaign for universal health coverage. Then they have receive my last donation until they drop such idiocy.
7 posted on
09/14/2007 10:16:07 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
With a track record like that, the American Cancer Society should continue its lifesaving messages about prevention and screening instead of switching to a political agenda. The ACS has never been about cancer, it always had a political agenda
But "livesaving messages"? They should be working on cures instead. Who has ever been cured of cancer by hearing a "message"?
If the ACS spend 1/4 of the money it has on promoting smoking and food bans on researching a cure/better treatments instead who knows how much more our knowledge would be advanced
8 posted on
09/14/2007 10:17:41 AM PDT by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
9 posted on
09/14/2007 10:19:51 AM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Well I have made my last donation to the American Cancer Society. Instead of working for a cure, they are supporting the spread of the social cancer called socialism.
10 posted on
09/14/2007 10:20:18 AM PDT by
Ben Mugged
(Thanks Mom for not considering me a "choice".)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
The old adages always applies: You get what you pay for.............Caveat Emptor...........
12 posted on
09/14/2007 10:21:53 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I am thinking this through as I’m typing, so my suggestions will not be complete.
However, the thought occurs to me that a relatively uncomplicated way to provide “universal health care” would be to pass a federal revenue law allowing a tax credit (NOT a deduction - but a 100% tax credit) for all medical expenses, including a 100% tax credit for medical insurance premiums paid to an insurance provider.
There would be no substantial addition bureaucracy established. The consumer could choose the insurance company for insurance purposes and also have the choice of doctors, hospitals, etc.
If one’s tax credit exceeded taxes due, the “earned income tax credit” could be applied to offset these additional expenses.
The insurance company infrastruction is already in place, the policies are already written - just allow every consumer to choose.
People not having sufficient income to pay taxes and qualify as “poverty level”, would access the current Medicaid system.
Look, this is gonna be expensive. It will be riddled with graft and abuse, but the American public as determined that is is going to happen, and so it will.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I will never give another dime to the ACS. As a general rule, with some exceptions, those who wind up in policy positions in medicine are poor physicians, are egotistical, wouldn’t do well in practice, and are far removed from the reality of daily patient care. They are the worst people to have in those positions. Many are also lazy, and avoid taking weekend and night call, and all the other things that physicians must do, by spending their days going to meetings instead. If you needed a physician in an emergency, these are the last people you would ever want to see. Often the most laughable clowns wind up heading medical associations. With, as i said, some exceptions.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
i cant believe this crap. acs has received my last donation. the word needs to spread on what this organization is doing. most people have no clue what they are donating too. are there any other cancer foundations out there that can be donated to besides acs that dont have socialist agendas?
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
S C R A T C H
That sound you just heard was me removing the ACS from my charitable donations list.
A letter to them expressing my disgust and displeasure has been dispatched.
22 posted on
09/14/2007 10:46:31 AM PDT by
upchuck
(The President has an Agenda, and it's not promoting The Land of the Free and The Home of the Brave.)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
Last week the American Cancer Society announced it will no longer run ads about the dangers of smoking and other cancer-causing behaviors and the benefits of regular screenings. Instead, the Society will devote this year's entire advertising budget to a campaign for universal health coverage. Looks like they want to be sure their doctor friends get paid.
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
I just called them and lodged my opinion (stinking socialism) at the following number: 1-800-ACS-2345.
Be polite, ‘cause ya catch more flies with honey.
27 posted on
09/14/2007 11:58:40 AM PDT by
ExpatGator
(Extending logic since 1961.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson