I met in Los Angeles a few months ago with John Emshwiller and told him the story. His first comment was to ask why no one has written about this. I had some ideas — 1) it is a complicated story, 2) many reporters want Hillary to win, and 3) many eidtors and reporters are afraid of her.
Finally, we have a reporter in the mainsteam media that is telling the voters that Hillary is soon going to be under oath and that this case is going to court.
Now -— Rush and Drudge, start talking about this.
It’s a start, but it’s still on page A7.
OTOH, 14 months is a lifetime in politics.
Congratulations Doug, you were fighting a somewhat uphill battle there and your perseverance is paying off.
Very impressive and praise worthy IMO.
Great job Doug...
This is right up Rush’s alley. I would be surprised if he hasn’t read about it. I agree: RUSH, DRUDGE, talk about it!
Thank you for your tireless work TRYING to get some Hillary truth out there before it’s too late.
Doug,
Some Republican leaders have said that they believe that Hillary would be easier to defeat (because of her high negatives) than either of the other 2 Dems.
What is your take on that?
Ya know, Doug, a Photoshopped HRC and Belechick would underscore the point of this. Rule benders/breakers.
CONGRATULATIONS!! WELL DONE!!
“1) it is a complicated story”
It certainly is... And if there’s a good, detailed website or summary of it I’d love it if someone could link me. Let me preface the following by saying that I’ve TRIED to follow this case, and if I can’t, as an interested party, then how can the average reporter or citizen be convinced?
All the accounts I’ve read of it are somewhat (read: very)vague. Like, I’ve read Clinton was supposed to become a business partner after leaving office in 2001... But then I’ve also read that the company he’s accused of not joining actually went out of business 2 months before that. And if Peter Paul paid for this trying to lure the Clintons into a business deal, can’t this be dismissed by the Clintons as a failed bribery attempt?
I’ve been to a page that supposedly laid the case out in great detail... But all I saw were a bunch of emotional phrases like “Clintons responsible for failure of Stan Lee (creator of Spiderman)!” without a lot of backing info. It seems almost tacked on, and then quotes from Stan Lee that he DIDN’T give a check, then something about EXCHANGING a check... And the details are just never laid out.
It seems like there should be a great story here, but I haven’t found a source yet that connects the dots. Suggestions?
Great work Doug!
How many others, besides Paul, have been fleeced for millions but kept their mouths shut? Sure helps to explain how two penniless grifters, on the government dole their entire lives, end up worth megabucks.
ping
***************************EXCERPT INTRO***********************
Norman Hsu, who was on the run from sentencing in a 15-year-old, $1 million fraud case in California, is at the center of two more sets of allegations, one involving $40 million in New York and another involving $33 million in California.
Hsu’s attorney dismissed the new information as “rank hearsay” during a hearing on Thursday.
Mesa County District Attorney Pete Hautzinger told Mesa County Judge Bruce Raaum of the allegations surrounding Hsu as he sought a $50 million bond for Hsu, a high-flying fundraiser for top-level Democrats until last week.
Raaum set bond at $5 million.
Congressman Billybob
Latest article, "Support the National Party of the United Race?"