[RebelTex]

Doug,

Some Republican leaders have said that they believe that Hillary would be easier to defeat (because of her high negatives) than either of the other 2 Dems.

What is your take on that?

[goldstategop]

They don't matter because the MSM runs interference for her. Hillary is an ethically challenged person who gets away with it because no one holds her accountable. She has won by huge margins in New York, illustrating her negatives don't matter much to voters. And she can always play the Gender Card when attacked.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[doug from upland]

I hate to take the chance. She would have 5 million young women vote who never would otherwise vote. She would have millions of illegal and dead people votes. And the 2008 October Surprise could be her opponent having an unfortunate “accident.” She will do anything for power.

[6ppc]

Some Republican leaders have said that they believe that Hillary would be easier to defeat (because of her high negatives) than either of the other 2 Dems.

I personally don't believe that Obama can win simply because he is a lightweight. This is reflected in the foreign policy gaffes he has made in recent weeks and will become more obvious during a head to head campaign with a Republican.

I don't believe Edwards can win because I firmly believe the American people can clearly see he is a vain empty shell.

Therefore Hillary is the dims best hope.