Posted on 09/07/2007 10:40:07 AM PDT by NapkinUser
Edited on 09/07/2007 2:31:57 PM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
Has this been a hectic and encouraging time! First we got almost 17% in the Texas straw poll, an event set-up to represent the establishment, with very restrictive voting rules. That 17% of the Republican hierarchy would support our views, after a full day of pro-war propaganda, is good news. Then we won the more open Maryland Republican straw poll with 28%. In both cases, as usual, hard-working, well-organized volunteers made all the difference.
The Fox debate was a lot of fun as well. It's true that a few of the network people are not exactly with us on foreign or domestic policy (though one famous guy whispered to me that he is a libertarian), but the audience—with lots of students from the University of New Hampshire—was definitely fair and balanced, as their enthusiastic reaction showed.
My opponents called for more war, more torture, more secret prisons, more eavesdropping, more presidential power. Some seemed to identify the government and the people as if they were one entity. But you and I know that once the government moves beyond its very limited constitutional mandate, it is an opponent of the people, a rip-off operation that takes our money and our freedom and our social peace, and gives us a mess of statist pottage in return.
The government failed miserably on 911 to protect us, despite spending trillions. So the answer was supposed to be the giant, socialist Department of Homeland Security, protecting you and me from taking our toothpaste on the airplane. I was ridiculed for saying that the airlines, which know best how to protect their property, should have been allowed to arm their pilots. But then, you and I really believe in the Second Amendment. It is not just a political slogan for us.
When I discussed the blowback that came from us intervening on the Arabian peninsula, Chris Wallace asked me if I wanted to follow the marching orders of al-Qaeda. I responded that I wanted to follow the marching orders of the Constitution, and not wage undeclared, aggressive wars that cause us only trouble. This is a mystifying to some, of course, but not to more and more Americans.
There was much talk of taxes, and a pledge not to raise rates. But as usual, I was not allowed to discuss my lifelong pledge to abolish the income tax. Just holding the line, when the government takes such vast sums through an illegitimate guilty-until-proven-innocent system, is hardly enough. We need to slash taxes and spending if we are to have a future of prosperity for ourselves and our families.
After the debate, many young people gathered around the stage to discuss our ideas and ask questions about them (and to have me sign their badges). My colleagues got no such response, and after a few moments, "security" ordered me off the stage. Can't have any such demonstration of interest in liberty.
But the young are with us, and so are Americans of every stripe. Even party officials. When one of my opponent said it was OK to lose elections through supporting the Iraq war, that set party people's teeth on edge, and rightly so. The Republican party is shrinking. We need new people. It's either our ideas or President Hillary, and more and more people recognize it.
But the media, and everyone else, will be looking at fundraising totals at the end of this month. They'll judge us by how we do. And we need help to wage what we hope will be a full-scale, 50-state campaign. Please help me head into the next quarter fully armed to do battle for freedom, peace and prosperity. Make your most generous contribution https://www.ronpaul2008.com/donate/. This Revolution is on the move, but it very much needs your support.
Sincerely,
Ron
...We’ve committed the invasion of this war, and it’s illegal under international law. That’s where I take my marching orders...
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/05/us/politics/06text.html?pagewanted=10&_r=1
It is so comforting that the champion of US out of UN and Constitutionality admits he takes his marching orders from international law.
**************
Heavens to Betsy! Don't I know it!
Meanwhile, Ron Paul supports huge tax cuts, massive spending cuts, doing away with the department of education, ending entitlement programs and securing our borders. Also he's got an A+ from the Gun Owners of America.
Paul > Giuliani
*************
He writes like a fourteen year old girl.
That despite a few bad apples like Kerry, I'll trust someone who served (Ron Paul) over a draft-dodger (Giuliani) when it comes to issues of national security.
Third degree burns > Second degree burns
Dysentery > Diarrhea
Um, there are more choices that that, but whatever...
Oh and Draft dodger is a bit lame to use everywhere.
False Dichotomy
Further, would you trust Jack Murtha or Lee Oswald over a draft-dodger like Giuliani? They both served (in the Corps! no less).
Message from the moonbat.
Giuliani is the only candidate I will not vote for, in both the primary and, God forbid, the general election, under any circumstances.
“Yeah, this man is on Al-Qaeda’s side.”
Howard Zinn wore a uniform too. So did John Kerry. So did Kos.
So what?
My question is, who would I want in my foxhole? With Rudy, my biggest worry would be he would cross dress and kiss me on the cheek, with Paul, I would fear he would shoot me in the back.
..and no, I don’t endorse Rudy..
LOL!
By the way, I “obtained” an early draft of part of this diary entry and posted it in #16. Seems he toned it down a skosh before releasing it.
Please: Not Ron Paul threads without a picture of the man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.