[NapkinUser]

What's your point...

That despite a few bad apples like Kerry, I'll trust someone who served (Ron Paul) over a draft-dodger (Giuliani) when it comes to issues of national security.

[ejonesie22]

Um, there are more choices that that, but whatever...

Oh and Draft dodger is a bit lame to use everywhere.

[Petronski]

I'll trust someone who served (Ron Paul) over a draft-dodger (Giuliani) when it comes to issues of national security.

False Dichotomy

Further, would you trust Jack Murtha or Lee Oswald over a draft-dodger like Giuliani? They both served (in the Corps! no less).

[toddlintown]

“I’ll trust someone who served (Ron Paul) over a draft-dodger (Giuliani) when it comes to issues of national security.”

I think you’re one napkin short of a dispenser.

[Mr. Silverback]

Though i’m no Giuliani fan, it is dishonest for you to use the term “draft dodger” to describe someone who received a legitimate deferment.

[rideharddiefast]

I'll trust someone who served (Ron Paul) over a draft-dodger (Giuliani) when it comes to issues of national security.

You would trust someone who blames America first and is only interested in surrendering to the terrorists on issues of national security. If cut and run had his way we would have no nation to secure. The terrorists would control it.

[freedomdefender]

Ron Paul isn’t handsome, that’s for sure. But his ideas are much closer to the Constitution than the more telegenic candidates. What do you want, good principles or good looks?

[Republican Wildcat]

Why not try to defend Ron Paul on the merits of what he said rather than trying to project onto Giuliani?

[SoldierDad]

That despite a few bad apples like Kerry, I'll trust someone who served (Ron Paul)

Go and read the bio on Ru Paul. Serve? Sure, he was in the military - briefly. But did he serve his country? No, he used his brief military experience to further his career aspirations and never was in any way involved in anything remotely like real service to this country.