Fox News requires only excerpts. You'll have to click on the link to read the whole story.
There's also a story in the Washington comPost.
To: Paleo Conservative
This dame really has a vivid imagination if she thinks she can manipulate the system like this.
2 posted on
09/05/2007 10:21:21 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: Paleo Conservative
I don’t believe she has anything, if there was anything it would of been wall-to-wall coverage already by the Main Stream Media courtesy of Larry “Chicken Lover” Flynt.
3 posted on
09/05/2007 10:22:35 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: Paleo Conservative
she might have to divulge classified informationClassified, or just damning? Somehow, I don't think the local DC Madame ever submitted an SF86 for a security clearance.
4 posted on
09/05/2007 10:23:06 AM PDT by
Sax
To: Paleo Conservative
Security risks? Precisely the reason we don’t want our lawmakers sleeping with prostitutes.... Could it BE any more obvious!
5 posted on
09/05/2007 10:23:11 AM PDT by
colorcountry
(Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. --Voltaire)
To: Paleo Conservative
I hope she offers up proof that some of the hypocrite terrorists used the escort service.
6 posted on
09/05/2007 10:23:13 AM PDT by
RDTF
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, but Democrats believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
To: Paleo Conservative
...which is why I can only show you the Republican entries...
7 posted on
09/05/2007 10:24:36 AM PDT by
50sDad
(Angels on asteroids are abducting crop circles!)
To: Paleo Conservative
Ooops... Wrong thread. :O)
8 posted on
09/05/2007 10:25:37 AM PDT by
jdm
To: Paleo Conservative
12 posted on
09/05/2007 10:47:39 AM PDT by
enots
To: Paleo Conservative
In court papers filed this week, Deborah Jeane Palfrey said she might have to divulge classified information to defend herself against racketeering charges. So, she disclosed Sen. Vitter, but she's protecting Islamic terrorists?
-PJ
15 posted on
09/05/2007 10:52:31 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
To: Paleo Conservative
D.C. Madam: Clients' Secrets Might Have National Security ImplicationsDUH.
18 posted on
09/05/2007 10:53:40 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: Paleo Conservative
Its pretty obvious that she was allowed to operate in DC for many years, and that’s likely because her service was used in conjunction with blackmailing people, foreign nationals included. So I don’t doubt there are some “national security” issues at play here.
To: Paleo Conservative
Wow. The DC madam used Muslims and Senator Vetter on her docet. Great role models for all to see. Idiots.
To: Paleo Conservative
She was just a madam who got caught, happened before. She isn’t as dam special as she thinks she is.
If she keeps this up she should change her last name to Lohan.
22 posted on
09/05/2007 10:58:14 AM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Paleo Conservative
Yup, yup, yup.............if politicians don’t want information out, just claim it is a matter of Nation Security.
24 posted on
09/05/2007 11:20:46 AM PDT by
RC2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson