D.C. Madam: Clients' Secrets Might Have National Security Implications

FOXNews.com ^ | Wednesday, September 05, 2007 | Staff

[Paleo Conservative]

WASHINGTON — A woman accused of running a high-end Washington prostitution ring says the U.S. government may be targeting her because Muslim men used her escort service before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In court papers filed this week, Deborah Jeane Palfrey said she might have to divulge classified information to defend herself against racketeering charges. She said the information — possibly including the identities of customers from the Middle East — could have national security implications.

Deborah Jeane Palfrey

[Paleo Conservative]

Fox News requires only excerpts. You'll have to click on the link to read the whole story.

There's also a story in the Washington comPost.

[Brilliant]

This dame really has a vivid imagination if she thinks she can manipulate the system like this.

[darkwing104]

I don’t believe she has anything, if there was anything it would of been wall-to-wall coverage already by the Main Stream Media courtesy of Larry “Chicken Lover” Flynt.

[Sax]

she might have to divulge classified information

Classified, or just damning? Somehow, I don't think the local DC Madame ever submitted an SF86 for a security clearance.

[colorcountry]

Security risks? Precisely the reason we don’t want our lawmakers sleeping with prostitutes.... Could it BE any more obvious!

[RDTF]

I hope she offers up proof that some of the hypocrite terrorists used the escort service.

[50sDad]

...which is why I can only show you the Republican entries...

[jdm]

GUILTY!!!

Ooops... Wrong thread. :O)

[dynachrome]

“Chicken Lover” Flynt
Probably still negotiating.

[nevergore]

"Security risks? Precisely the reason we don’t want our lawmakers sleeping with prostitutes.... "

Yeah!, There are some things even prostitutes shouldn't be subjected too, sleeping with politico's.....

BTW, how exactly do you tell the difference between a politician and a prostitute?

A: There are some things that prostitutes won't do for money....

[Califreak]

LOL!

[enots]

Additional info:
http://www.yardbird.com/reader_sen_vitter_breached_committee_duties.htm

[absolootezer0]

might be, it wouldn’t be the first time in history people tried to make themselves appear important and divulged state secrets between the sheets.

[antiRepublicrat]

B: A prostitute is honest about what she does.

[Political Junkie Too]

In court papers filed this week, Deborah Jeane Palfrey said she might have to divulge classified information to defend herself against racketeering charges.

So, she disclosed Sen. Vitter, but she's protecting Islamic terrorists?

-PJ

[antiRepublicrat]

Classified, or just damning?

It's not classified until someone with the authority to classify it says it is. OTOH, she could mean she has information that would be deemed classified were it to be reviewed.

[SeaHawkFan]

This dame really has a vivid imagination if she thinks she can manipulate the system like this.

Don't be so sure.

[mewzilla]

D.C. Madam: Clients' Secrets Might Have National Security Implications

DUH.

[NorthFlaRebel]

Its pretty obvious that she was allowed to operate in DC for many years, and that’s likely because her service was used in conjunction with blackmailing people, foreign nationals included. So I don’t doubt there are some “national security” issues at play here.

[nevergore]

lol!