Posted on 09/04/2007 5:01:27 AM PDT by theothercheek
Mexicos president Felipe Calderón used the occasion of his first state-of-the nation address to declare war on the United States (AKA Azatlan), proclaiming that, "Mexico does not end at its borders," and "[w]here there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."
El gato is out of the bag. The 400,000 illegal aliens who cross our southern border with Mexico each year now 12 million strong - are not here to "do the jobs that Americans wont do." They are an invading force waging Mexicos protracted campaign to achieve "La Reconquista."
Calderóns ambitions are being aided and abetted by a Fifth Column in this county that includes the ACLU, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce which have all joined forces to thwart all efforts to protect communities nationwide from being overrun - and even President George W. Bush, who has been stealthily laying plans for a European Union-style North American Union, with Calderón and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
What? You say youve never heard of the North American Union (NAU)? Thats because the negotiations between the U.S., Canada and Mexico have thus far been conducted in secret without oversight by our elected representatives in Congress. Writing in Human Events, Jerome R. Corsi (co-author, with John O'Neill, of "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry") has been doggedly covering NAU-related developments for more than a year:
The Bush Administration is pushing to create a North American Union out of the work on-going in the Department of Commerce under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in the NAFTA office headed by Geri Word. A key part of the plan is to expand the NAFTA tribunals into a North American Union court system that would have supremacy over all U.S. law, even over the U.S. Supreme Court, in any matter related to the trilateral political and economic integration of the United States, Canada and Mexico.
The executive branch under the Bush Administration is quietly putting in place a behind-the-scenes trilateral regulatory scheme, evidently without any direct congressional input, that should provide the rules by which any NAFTA or NAU court would examine when adjudicating NAU trade disputes.
We wonder if the Bush Administration intends to present the Trilateral Regulatory Cooperative Framework now being constructed to Congress for review in 2007, or will the administration simply continue along the path of knitting together the new NAU regional governmental structure behind closed doors by executive fiat?
Human Events details what Bush sees as the natural evolution of NAFTA and how U.S. sovereignty could be affected:
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.
His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do.
According to Corsi, incremental movement towards creation of the NAU by 2010 is occurring through a series of regulatory actions by the U.S. Department of Commerce - like allowing hundreds of Mexican trucks to ply our roadways nationwide, despite the 411-3 House vote in May against entry of these trucks on safety concerns.
Unless Congress stops its partisan bickering long enough to start paying attention to whats going on under their very noses, in three years our dinero is going to be called the Amero - and we wont need to build a border fence, because we will no longer have borders. Then, Mexico will have achieved La Reconquista without firing a shot.
Note: The Stiletto writes about politics and other stuff at The Stiletto Blog.
I agreed with your post on the reasons for our prior policy of forced assimilation. So it should follow that since that policy WORKED and current policy of multiculturalism doesn't, we should have changed policy long ago.
But, ignoring the wisdom of prior generations, and making believe today's "immigration" problem with Mexico is no different than prior immigrations, has allowed the situation to deteriorate to a point far beyond where you believe it to be.
Calderon's declaration makes it apparent that he sees Mexicans coming to the US not an as an IMMIGRATION but as a COLONIZATION! Our country needs leadership that deals with the Mexican government accordingly.
I wasn’t cherry picking.
I guess I didn’t communicate my thoughts effectively. What I meant to say is that Mexico’s president claims were nothing new.
Illegal immigration is wrong on so many levels. I’m sure if you have looked at my other posts you would know that I am not in favor of illegal immigration.
Whatever you meant when you wrote “the Italians were no different” is unclear.....esp parsed against the cites.
When we lived in Mexico (8 years), to have Article 33 waved over an American expate was one of the biggest threats we faced. If the immigration enforcers arrived at your door for any reason, you had to leave Mexico within 24 hours or go to jail. The enforcers stayed around until they saw you leave. Let’s have our own enforcers in ICE or local police) do the same thing here.
My grandmother wouldn’t teach us Italian because she said we are Americans and we speak English now. However, my father’s side came here from England in 1633 and I think we have the language down. I suspect that my grandmother, my mother and my aunts used Italian to talk about us.
Time to open the eyes, ears and engage the thinking apparatus. Even short sighted, comfort seeking, consumer oriented, self gratification, brainwashed, media reprogrammed zombies can see this spear flying at the heart of the USA. Jane Fonda, John Kerry and the clintons have made treason an outdated concept. Now folks don't focus on it, and don't see that Treason is the spear and it isn't only being committed by radical liberal Democrats.
If I do, do I get a decoder ring?
And I won’t get in trouble for posting on the *66*th post of the thread, will I?
Whatever, you clearly won’t see or hear it.
The same in my house. My grandmother and great-mother spoke Italian to each other while they were cooking or when they were gossiping.
bttt
McDonalds and FreeRepublic.com
Threads like this, Hunter's campaign, it's all just a distration to keep the 'outraged' busy and distracted.
http://www.city-journal.org/html/eon2007-08-29sm.html
>>Both studies found that immigrants used government services at a greater rate than native-born residents did. The New Jersey study found, for instance, that the typical immigrant family received about $4,044 annually in government services, about 11 percent higher than the average native-born family. At the same time, immigrant households paid about 8 percent less in taxes. The net result was that the average native household generated an annual fiscal surplus of $232 to government, while the typical foreign household was a net burden of $1,484. The gap was even wider in California, where immigrant households produced a net deficit of $3,463 each, because so much of that states recent immigration had been in the form of low-wage, low-skill workers.
Though the study did not distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants, it did break down foreign-born households by the regions of the world from which they had come. In both states, the study found the steepest deficit in Latin American households, which in New Jersey consumed 26 percent more in government expenditures than the average native-born family, but paid 38 percent less in taxes. By contrast, immigrant households in New Jersey that hailed from Europe or Canada actually consumed, on average, less in government services than the typical native-born family, and paid nearly as much in taxes.<<
There was a report put out by the Dept. Of Homeland Security that states “up to 10 million” illegals entered the country JUST LAST YEAR ALONE.
No way are there as few as 12 million. Even the pro-illegal groups have stated closer to 40.
Speaking of which....are you getting television commercials in your area about the possibility of a pandemic? In Ohio, we are, but I’m not sure who’s behind them.
Just curious...do you support Bush’s comprehensive immigration reform and giving illegal aliens a path to citizenship? And are you for or against our borders being effectively secured?
bump for publicity
ping
Jorge El Segundo, El Presidente de Los Estados Unidos del Norte y de Mejico.
George Bush with the aid of his congressional Cronies - all of the ‘Rats and all of the Rinos (we need a zookeeper in congress) is responsible for this outrageous effrontery and bombastic rhetoric.
In ancient times, cities had walls.
Now we know why.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.