.jpg)
Posted on 09/04/2007 5:01:27 AM PDT by theothercheek
Mexico’s president Felipe Calderón used the occasion of his first state-of-the nation address to declare war on the United States (AKA Azatlan), proclaiming that, "Mexico does not end at its borders," and "[w]here there is a Mexican, there is Mexico."
El gato is out of the bag. The 400,000 illegal aliens who cross our southern border with Mexico each year – now 12 million strong - are not here to "do the jobs that Americans won’t do." They are an invading force waging Mexico’s protracted campaign to achieve "La Reconquista."
Calderón’s ambitions are being aided and abetted by a Fifth Column in this county that includes the ACLU, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce – which have all joined forces to thwart all efforts to protect communities nationwide from being overrun - and even President George W. Bush, who has been stealthily laying plans for a European Union-style North American Union, with Calderón and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
What? You say you’ve never heard of the North American Union (NAU)? That’s because the negotiations between the U.S., Canada and Mexico have thus far been conducted in secret – without oversight by our elected representatives in Congress. Writing in Human Events, Jerome R. Corsi (co-author, with John O'Neill, of "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry") has been doggedly covering NAU-related developments for more than a year:
The Bush Administration is pushing to create a North American Union out of the work on-going in the Department of Commerce under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America in the NAFTA office headed by Geri Word. A key part of the plan is to expand the NAFTA tribunals into a North American Union court system that would have supremacy over all U.S. law, even over the U.S. Supreme Court, in any matter related to the trilateral political and economic integration of the United States, Canada and Mexico. …
The executive branch under the Bush Administration is quietly putting in place a behind-the-scenes trilateral regulatory scheme, evidently without any direct congressional input, that should provide the rules by which any NAFTA or NAU court would examine when adjudicating NAU trade disputes. …
We wonder if the Bush Administration intends to present the Trilateral Regulatory Cooperative Framework now being constructed … to Congress for review in 2007, or will the administration simply continue along the path of knitting together the new NAU regional governmental structure behind closed doors by executive fiat?
Human Events details what Bush sees as the natural evolution of NAFTA – and how U.S. sovereignty could be affected:
President Bush is pursuing a globalist agenda to create a North American Union, effectively erasing our borders with both Mexico and Canada. This was the hidden agenda behind the Bush administration's true open borders policy.
Secretly, the Bush administration is pursuing a policy to expand NAFTA politically, setting the stage for a North American Union designed to encompass the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. What the Bush administration truly wants is the free, unimpeded movement of people across open borders with Mexico and Canada.
President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed. …
His secret agenda is to dissolve the United States of America into the North American Union. The administration has no intent to secure the border, or to enforce rigorously existing immigration laws. Securing our border with Mexico is evidently one of the jobs President Bush just won't do.
According to Corsi, incremental movement towards creation of the NAU by 2010 is occurring through a series of regulatory actions by the U.S. Department of Commerce - like allowing hundreds of Mexican trucks to ply our roadways nationwide, despite the 411-3 House vote in May against entry of these trucks on safety concerns.
Unless Congress stops its partisan bickering long enough to start paying attention to what’s going on under their very noses, in three years our dinero is going to be called the Amero - and we won’t need to build a border fence, because we will no longer have borders. Then, Mexico will have achieved La Reconquista without firing a shot.
Note: The Stiletto writes about politics and other stuff at The Stiletto Blog.
An e-mail from a friend:
Subject: MEXICAN CONSTITUTION ON ILLEGAL ALIENS
Having lived in Mexico City for ten years and gotten
to know the Mexicans and their ways in some detail,
their collective xenophobia and attitude toward all
foreigners is reflected in the Mexican constitution,
below. I propose that the US government tell the
Mexicans that we are willing to discuss easing our
immigration laws as they affect Mexicans if they
delete Article 33 of their constitution which they
seem to change from time to time to suit current
circumstances.
[My free translation:]
CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED MEXICAN STATES
TITLE ONE
CHAPTER III
Article 33
ARTICLE 33. FOREIGNERS ARE THOSE WHO ARE NOT DEFINED
AS MEXICAN CITIZENS IN ARTICLE 30 [MEXICANS BY BIRTH,
MEXICANS BY NATURALIZATION]. FOREIGNERS HAVE THE
RIGHTS CONFERRED BY CHAPTER I, TITLE ONE, OF THE
PRESENT CONSTITUTION [THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THIS
CONSTITUTION; PROHIBITION OF SLAVERY; NON-DISCRIMINATION]; BUT THE EXECUTIVE OF THE UNION WILL HAVE THE EXCLUSIVE POWER TO MAKE ALL FOREIGNERS WHOSE PRESENCE IS CONSIDERED INCONVENIENT, ABANDON THE NATIONAL TERRITORY IMMEDIATELY AND WITHOUT THE NEED FOR DUE LEGAL PROCESS.
FOREIGNERS MAY NOT IN ANY WAY BECOME INVOLVED IN THE POLITICAL AFFAIRS OF THE COUNTRY.
Regards,
Our politicians agenda.....keep us fat, dumb and happy. (Hence our school system)
There is NO superhighway. It does not exist. It is a tinfoil alert. ... There is NO superhighway. It does not exist. It is a tinfoil alert. ... There is NO superhighway. It does not exist. It is a tinfoil alert. ... There is NO superhighway. It does not exist. It is a tinfoil aleZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
“...now 12 million strong...”
this number has been touted as the total for more than 4 years now, as if they have stopped breaking and entering our country and squatting for as long as they possibly can.
I can’t even imagine why someone who writes an article such as this would use the 12 million number!
This is old news, but still relevant to what you're saying:
An estimated 11 million Mexican citizens are in the United States, about half of them illegally. Last year, Mexican migrants sent home more than $20 billion in remittances, the country's second leading source of foreign income after oil. In the first eight months of 2006, remittances rose by nearly 20 percent over the same period last year, according to figures released by the Mexican Central Bank on Monday.
I guess it’s time for me to type up a form letter and start mailing it out to all of our politicians.
I am not a wagering man, but I would wager that if historians searched long enough, they would find a speech delivered by HITLER himself, where he must have said “Wherever Germans are, there is Germany”. I dont know, relating to the Sudetenland, Danzig, somewhere.
Nope. A little paranoia can be healthy:-)
ping
AAAAAAAAHHHHH! STOP THAT!
Since it’s impossible to say how many there are - it could be 20 million if you count aunts, uncles, third cousins (family reuinfication, y’know) - the 12 million is probably used because it’s been in print before and can be souced. Otherwise, the writer will be pulling a number out of the thin air (not that the 12 million isn’t, but at least it’s out there already).
Boy, does this sound plausible.
That $20 billion - it’s not being spent on health insurance, groceries or rent. Nor is it being spent in the stores in the small towns illegal aliens have overrun. No, the taxpayers of those towns are footing the bill for welfare benefits so the illegals can send as much money as possible back to Mexico. I don’t care what the ACLU, Chamber of Commerce, Wall Street Journal and other open borders shills tell us, illegal immigration is a huge drain on local economies - and probably on a macro level as well.
The Italians were no different. That is why there was push by our government to speed up assimilation.
Here is a link to John Fonte’s excellent piece on Duel Allegiance:
http://www.cis.org/articles/2005/back1205.html
In 1928, the Italian Ambassador to the United States, Signor Rolandi-Ricci toured Italian-American immigrant communities urging Italian immigrants to “become naturalized so that they could cast their ballots unitedly to foster Italian interests.”51
In 1929, Benito Mussolini declared: “My order is that an Italian citizen must remain an Italian citizen, no matter in what land he lives, even to the seventh generation.”53
In 1929, Arnaldo Mussolini (the Duce’s brother) wrote in the official Popolo d’Italia: “Ten million Italians live in foreign lands. This is a second national community which has a sacred duty to accomplish; that of preserving the soul and the national character of the coming generations…the sons of Italians abroad should be brought up to feel, to think, to love, to act, to hope as do the sons of Italians at home.”56
In 1929, Arnaldo Mussolini wrote, “Young people are the prey sought by preference by the nations eager to assimilate foreigners….The guardianship of young Italians abroad is a matter of greater importance…it is a measure of national defense.”58
In 1933, the Italian Consul in Baltimore, Mario Orsini Ratto, declared in the Italian-American newspaper L’Avvernire degli Italo-Americani that “Italo-Americans can, in a 10-year period of serious organization, become a formidable electoral and financial force and offer unprecedented opportunities for intellectual and economic influence.”60
Mexico’s reply was “We don’t have enough Mexicans in the Southwest to hold it, YET”!
Duncan Hunter is the man.
I support him in large part because he is so sane.
Just the facts, ma’am. Thank you very much. He’s like Joe Friday on Dragnet, only more lifelike.
Duncan Hunter would see this thread the same way I see it. As unutterably stupid, ill-conceived and not to mention, pointless. Not that he would use those words that I did, but it would be implied, if you understand implication.
Even though he agrees with you all on the alien issue and the culpability of the Mexican Gov. and the misguided notions of our President on what is best.
Those of you who support Duncan...do you ever ask yourself why he is so much superior to yourselves in the way he conducts HIMSELF on this, and every other issue, he weighs in on??? Ever consider using HIM as your role model on handling this issue? If not, why not??
You all need to find a kook on this issue - a Ron Paul TYPE - and support HIM, not Duncan the Sane. Would be a more understandable fit with your approach.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.