Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese donor sounds like '96 (1996 and 2008 are both "Year of the Rat")
wash times ^ | 9-4-07 | Gertz

Posted on 09/03/2007 11:48:45 PM PDT by doug from upland

Article published Sep 4, 2007 Chinese donor sounds like '96

September 4, 2007

By Bill Gertz - Questionable donations to Democratic officials and presidential candidates from a Chinese-American businessman highlight past concerns over Chinese political influence-buying operations.

Apparel executive Norman Hsu, who turned himself in last week to authorities in California to face fraud charges, donated more than $1 million to senior Democrats, including the presidential campaigns of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois.

Mr. Hsu, a native of Hong Kong, has not been linked to any foreign government, and the fraud charges are unrelated to campaign contributions. It is not known whether federal investigators are looking into his donations, most of which were made since 2003.

Mrs. Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity, said last week that the case does not appear similar to the 1996 scandal involving a covert effort by China's government to funnel money to President Clinton's re-election campaign.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; chinagate; chinesemoney; clinton; clintontong; crushclinton; democrats; elections; hillary; hillaryscandals; hsu; normanhsu
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 09/03/2007 11:48:51 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Mrs. Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity, said last week that the case does not appear similar to the 1996 scandal involving a covert effort by China's government to funnel money to President Clinton's re-election campaign.

Absolutely, the serial numbers of the bills were not the same as those received in '96.

2 posted on 09/03/2007 11:53:23 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Gee, I expected her to say it’s just like that other scandal.


3 posted on 09/04/2007 12:31:22 AM PDT by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Mrs. Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity, said last week that the case does not appear similar to the 1996 scandal involving a covert effort by China's government to funnel money to President Clinton's re-election campaign.

so it's a different scandal.

4 posted on 09/04/2007 12:33:27 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
"Apparel executive Norman Hsu"

He's referred to this way, but as far as I know no one has been able to find any real company associated with him, and the so-called businesses listed on various forms have thus far proved to be not even real 'front' companies since nothing related turns up at the addresses listed. Have any reporters yet tracked down any real business associated with this man????

"What we saw in 1996 was similar," Mr. Triplett said. "Whenever the Clintons have money trouble, they turn to the Chinese and the Chinese don't let them down. Perhaps it is only a coincidence that both 1996 and 2008 are Years of the Rat in the Chinese calendar."

yes, the YEAR OF THE RAT!! How perfectly appropriate for DemocRAT fundraising scandals.....
5 posted on 09/04/2007 12:57:47 AM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

It’s funny how THIS year, in the year of the PIG, crapitalists aiding and abetting our enemies in China are going to feel the wrath of the educated consumer.


6 posted on 09/04/2007 1:11:38 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
"Apparent Apparel executive Norman Hsu"
7 posted on 09/04/2007 2:46:45 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

It’s embarrassing how no news organization has detailed these companies yet. “Nothing is there at address 123 Main St.” is not savvy investigative reporting.


8 posted on 09/04/2007 2:48:42 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Check this out:

ChinaGate: Hillary vs Fred Thompson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGsUZFUPcJo

Does not appear similar? Bull!!!


9 posted on 09/04/2007 4:15:04 AM PDT by tiger640
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
“Mrs. Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu’s money to charity . . .”

This sounds very strange to me, I mean, that she gave this money to charity. What if that money becomes evidence in a criminal investigation? Will the charity recipients have to forfeit that money?

10 posted on 09/04/2007 4:22:32 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante
"Apparel executive Norman Hsu"
He's referred to this way, but as far as I know no one has been able to find any real company associated with him, and the so-called businesses listed on various forms have thus far proved to be not even real 'front' companies since nothing related turns up at the addresses listed.

Good point. Bill Gertz writes in a couple other inaccuracies. Not major, and certainly uncharacterisic for Gertz, but worth mention:

He says, "Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity..."; Unless Gertz has confirmation of that--and if he does, why doesn't he provide details as to the charity?--the accurate statement is, "Clinton, who said she was going to give $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity..."

Also: "Apparel executive Norman Hsu, who turned himself in last week to authorities in California to face fraud charges..." No. He turned himself in to face charges for failing to appear for sentencing for the fraud charges on which he was convicted.

11 posted on 09/04/2007 5:31:02 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

A good question. Maybe the money should have been used for restitution for the victims.


12 posted on 09/04/2007 6:08:40 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

And, just like in 1996, the media will studiously ignore the scandal, or publicize only the Clintons’ side of it,

and nothing will come of it.


13 posted on 09/04/2007 6:10:03 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

HSU, YOUR SUGAR DADDY NOW, HILL?

Hill's memories of HSU will be fading quickly to "I Don't Recall!"

New Hilliarily Clinton Ad

14 posted on 09/04/2007 12:19:36 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Donate to Vets For Freedom: http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

HEY BILL GERTZ.....WHAT CHARITY AND LET”S SEE THE CHECK!!! Geesh....Bill Gertz USED to be a great reporter! I guess he wants to LIVE.


15 posted on 09/04/2007 6:01:06 PM PDT by Suzy Quzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
When Controversy Follows Cash

Sant S. Chatwal, an Indian American businessman, has helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaigns, even as he battled governments on two continents to escape bankruptcy and millions of dollars in tax liens....

I'm surprised that WaPo had this on the front page.

16 posted on 09/04/2007 6:29:03 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What do you think? Is the stage being set to prepare them for the Los Angeles grand premiere of PAUL v CLINTON?


17 posted on 09/04/2007 6:36:08 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
What do you think?

I don't know, but there are fears that with her at the top of the ticket all of the neoCOMs will do poorly on Election Day.

18 posted on 09/04/2007 7:50:27 PM PDT by neverdem (Call talk radio. We need a Constitutional Amendment for Congressional term limits. Let's Roll!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All; Navy Patriot

.

NEVER trust another CLINTON:

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/938640/posts

.


19 posted on 09/04/2007 8:28:21 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All; Enchante; Richard Poe; Clinton Is Scum

.

CHINA GATE CLARITY =

Report: -RIADY- Walks after Day/Night in LA Court

http://www.Freerepublic.com/forum/a3ab7ae794f32.htm

.


20 posted on 09/04/2007 8:42:23 PM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson