Posted on 09/03/2007 11:48:45 PM PDT by doug from upland
Article published Sep 4, 2007 Chinese donor sounds like '96
September 4, 2007
By Bill Gertz - Questionable donations to Democratic officials and presidential candidates from a Chinese-American businessman highlight past concerns over Chinese political influence-buying operations.
Apparel executive Norman Hsu, who turned himself in last week to authorities in California to face fraud charges, donated more than $1 million to senior Democrats, including the presidential campaigns of Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and Barack Obama of Illinois.
Mr. Hsu, a native of Hong Kong, has not been linked to any foreign government, and the fraud charges are unrelated to campaign contributions. It is not known whether federal investigators are looking into his donations, most of which were made since 2003.
Mrs. Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity, said last week that the case does not appear similar to the 1996 scandal involving a covert effort by China's government to funnel money to President Clinton's re-election campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
Absolutely, the serial numbers of the bills were not the same as those received in '96.
Gee, I expected her to say it’s just like that other scandal.
so it's a different scandal.
It’s funny how THIS year, in the year of the PIG, crapitalists aiding and abetting our enemies in China are going to feel the wrath of the educated consumer.
It’s embarrassing how no news organization has detailed these companies yet. “Nothing is there at address 123 Main St.” is not savvy investigative reporting.
Check this out:
ChinaGate: Hillary vs Fred Thompson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGsUZFUPcJo
Does not appear similar? Bull!!!
This sounds very strange to me, I mean, that she gave this money to charity. What if that money becomes evidence in a criminal investigation? Will the charity recipients have to forfeit that money?
Good point. Bill Gertz writes in a couple other inaccuracies. Not major, and certainly uncharacterisic for Gertz, but worth mention:
He says, "Clinton, who gave $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity..."; Unless Gertz has confirmation of that--and if he does, why doesn't he provide details as to the charity?--the accurate statement is, "Clinton, who said she was going to give $23,000 of Mr. Hsu's money to charity..."
Also: "Apparel executive Norman Hsu, who turned himself in last week to authorities in California to face fraud charges..." No. He turned himself in to face charges for failing to appear for sentencing for the fraud charges on which he was convicted.
A good question. Maybe the money should have been used for restitution for the victims.
And, just like in 1996, the media will studiously ignore the scandal, or publicize only the Clintons’ side of it,
and nothing will come of it.
HSU, YOUR SUGAR DADDY NOW, HILL?
Hill's memories of HSU will be fading quickly to "I Don't Recall!"
HEY BILL GERTZ.....WHAT CHARITY AND LET”S SEE THE CHECK!!! Geesh....Bill Gertz USED to be a great reporter! I guess he wants to LIVE.
Sant S. Chatwal, an Indian American businessman, has helped raise hundreds of thousands of dollars for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaigns, even as he battled governments on two continents to escape bankruptcy and millions of dollars in tax liens....
I'm surprised that WaPo had this on the front page.
What do you think? Is the stage being set to prepare them for the Los Angeles grand premiere of PAUL v CLINTON?
I don't know, but there are fears that with her at the top of the ticket all of the neoCOMs will do poorly on Election Day.
.
CHINA GATE CLARITY =
Report: -RIADY- Walks after Day/Night in LA Court
http://www.Freerepublic.com/forum/a3ab7ae794f32.htm
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.