Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arthur Miller (playwright) ignored Down Syndrome son
New York Times ^ | August 30, 2007 | Jason Zinoman

Posted on 08/30/2007 10:56:21 AM PDT by reaganaut1

Arthur Miller, who died in February 2005, [and Inge Morath] had a son born with Down syndrome in 1966. Soon after, they made the painful decision to put the child, Miller’s youngest, in an institution for the mentally retarded before Miller essentially cut him out of his life.

Ms. Andrews describes in detail how Miller rarely, if ever, accompanied his wife on weekly visits to see Daniel, almost never mentioned him to shocked friends and didn’t mention him in his memoir, “Timebends.”

The picture that emerges is of a father in denial and a son who has moved on to live a happy life without him.

...

It’s a subject that most people who knew Miller would rather not discuss. Edward Albee, who spoke movingly at his memorial, declined to comment. And David Richenthal, who produced three Miller revivals, did the same after saying, “I make no judgment.”

Other observers have been less forgiving. In a scathing post last week on the blog for the neoconservative Commentary magazine, James Kirchick suggests that this story “ought to damage permanently Miller’s reputation, if not as a writer, then as a humanitarian.”

What makes the revelation of Daniel so upsetting is how it juxtaposes Miller’s private decision with his public image, as one of the greatest American playwrights and the man who refused to name names before the House Committee on Un-American Activities and eloquently and loudly opposed the Vietnam War.

For many of those who came of age in the middle of the last century a saintly glow hovers around Miller, whose plays have often examined questions of guilt and morality through the prism of family. He was a hero of the left and a champion of the downtrodden. “Lincoln in horn rims” is what the critic Kenneth Tynan called him.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: arthurmiller; downssyndrome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2007 10:56:22 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Just like the song says, Marilyn Monroe should have married Henry Miller.


2 posted on 08/30/2007 10:57:37 AM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Leftists lack compassion.

And I think Miller was over-rated as a writer.

3 posted on 08/30/2007 11:01:26 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agammemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
What makes the revelation of Daniel so upsetting is how it juxtaposes Miller’s private decision with his public image, as one of the greatest American playwrights and the man who refused to name names before the House Committee on Un-American Activities and eloquently and loudly opposed the Vietnam War.

No juxtaposition for me. He was an America-hating communist and a lackluster playright who made his name because his like-minded friends in entertainment and the media lionized him. The fact that he put away and ignored his retarded son jives perfectly with all of this.
4 posted on 08/30/2007 11:02:28 AM PDT by Antoninus (The greatest gifts parents can give their children are siblings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yet he’s one of the “beautiful people” and the glitterati.


5 posted on 08/30/2007 11:02:40 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Sure, kick a man when he's long dead and can't defend himself.

James Kirchick suggests that this story “ought to damage permanently Miller’s reputation

That was the intent, wasn't it? Other than to hopefully make a few bucks in the process. It's the liberal thing to do.

6 posted on 08/30/2007 11:03:14 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing
Just like the song says, Marilyn Monroe should have married Henry Miller.

“What am I, chopped liver?”

7 posted on 08/30/2007 11:06:25 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I think its is always difficult to make hard and fast conclusions about artists and writers vis vis their personal life and their art. One can like or dislike their art. One can contrast the presentation of themselves in their art with the facts of the life they actually lead. But it the long run it makes little or no difference- especially after death.

Arthur Miller was a gifted playwrite. Nothing can change that. His plays presented a perspective on life, as all art does. It is only a perspective- a snapshot from his position. What others do with that snapshot is perhaps more open to criticism than his creation of the snapshot.

Besides, you can't fault a man for having the good taste, and wild luck, to be married to Marilyn Monroe.

8 posted on 08/30/2007 11:07:18 AM PDT by Dogrobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing
Just like the song says, Marilyn Monroe should have married Henry Miller.

I have never heard of that song. Don't know if the 35 year age difference would have worked out.

9 posted on 08/30/2007 11:07:36 AM PDT by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Someone needs to write a play about this compassionate communist.


10 posted on 08/30/2007 11:07:49 AM PDT by bahblahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Attention must not be paid, when inconvenient.

Miller always struck me as a self-righteous jerk.


11 posted on 08/30/2007 11:08:26 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
I don't know how anyone could read or watch Death Of A Salesman and not know that Miller was touched by the most troubling issues of morality and family disfunction.

BTW the tv production starring Dustin Hoffman and John Malkovich was perhaps the most powerful thing I've seen in my life.

12 posted on 08/30/2007 11:08:45 AM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Arthur Miller never knew what he deprived himself of. Down’s syndrome kids are just as loving as normal kids and can bring joy as well as sadness.


13 posted on 08/30/2007 11:08:52 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3rd Bn. 5th Marines, RVN 1969. St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I agree with you wholeheartedly. He was a hate-filled egomaniacal wretch, who chose his targets in a way calculated to win him supporters among a certain subculture of the American left.


14 posted on 08/30/2007 11:09:07 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I agree that he was overrated. He struck me as a cold, boring person.


15 posted on 08/30/2007 11:09:38 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Death of a Failsman........


16 posted on 08/30/2007 11:09:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

The only surprise would be if he had handled his disabled son any differently.


17 posted on 08/30/2007 11:10:46 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

He was a lot of things but being over rated as a writer wasn’t one of them.
He was a great writer, who in my opinion was a lousy human being.


18 posted on 08/30/2007 11:12:21 AM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

He was a bleak, soulless wretch. And his words and his work were a constant reminder of that sad fact.


19 posted on 08/30/2007 11:14:16 AM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I have a special needs daughter, and I don’t think lack of compassion is always the answer.

First, I think there was a lack of understanding of all special needs people in the past. It was common practice to institutionalize them.

I also think that lots of parents are in denial about special needs kids.

My daughter has a brain injury, and she looks so normal. It’s very easy to be in denial about her problems (or minamilize them).

Thank God, there is a lot more information about treatment and help for special needs kids these days. There are support groups everywhere. The internet is just wonderful for parents of special needs kids to connect and get information.

Our society has just made tons of leaps and jumps in how we treat special needs people. It was very different in the 60s.


20 posted on 08/30/2007 11:15:05 AM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson