Researchers question school in high-tech age

The Globe and Mail ^ | 8/30/2007 | DEAN BENNETT

[doc30]

EDMONTON — As students across Canada head back to classrooms in this high-tech Information Age, there's a question in the front row that demands to be heard:

Why, in the Information Age, are students heading back to classrooms?

Researchers say students weaned on collaborative learning with high-tech devices are suffering in classrooms ruled by defenders of lecture-based orthodoxy wielding overhead projectors and reciting from dog-eared history textbooks that climax with Paul Martin's run for 24 Sussex Drive.

"It's not about using technology for technology's sake. It's allowing students to access the right information because of the information explosion," says Mohamed Ally, director of the Centre for Computing and Information Systems at Athabasca University, Alberta's distance-learning pioneer.

Ally is among a group of researchers across Canada looking at how to overhaul a method of teaching that, in some ways, has not fundamentally advanced in hundreds of years.

"It's pre-Gutenberg," says Don Tapscott, futurist, lecturer and author of bestsellers such as "Wikinomics," laughing as he recalls the assessment he heard from a university president.

"It's a prof working from handwritten notes. The students are all writing it down and the prof is writing on a blackboard. The assumption of the printing press is not even a fundamental part of the learning paradigm."

Dentists, doctors and other professionals asleep for 100 years would awake, he says, to a world where they would not recognize their jobs, much less perform them. But in education, a teacher could walk into a classroom after a century and get busy.

"There's a huge generational clash that's happening in the universities and schools," said Tapscott.

Students, he suggests, forced to line up at the photocopier to run off reams of paper off reading lists wonder why the professor just doesn't set up links to websites containing the material.

"The entire model of pedagogy is wrong for young people," he said.

Students who interact on the web, talk to each other digitally to resolve questions, post to the web and blog on the web are going to have problems adapting to sitting, listening, then regurgitating on an exam the words of one person standing at the front of the room, he said.

Ally notes that the sheer speed of information change makes textbooks, such as those in computing, outdated not in years but months.

"The read-and-remember and the listen-and-remember is kind of an old paradigm because information is changing at such a fast rate," said Ally.

He said the marriage of distance learning at institutions like Athabasca University with technology means the future is limited only by the imagination.

Consider, he says, a future where:

- Other countries could deliver courses to students in Canada. A student living in Calgary could graduate from a high school in Bonn.

- Software can detect ways in which a student learns and can tailor course material to those strengths: more examples if a student learns by example or more graphics if a student excels that way.

- Students continue to work together for much-needed social interaction, but advance according to outcome-based models rather than the age-based cohorts of Grades 1, 2, 3, etc.

- Teachers aren't in the classroom but are available to assist peer-to-peer learning or online to answer questions and give guidance.

Ally is helping to pioneer delivering course work tailored for mobile use on PDAs, iPhones, iPods and the like.

The goal is to free a student from the classroom. A student will be able to complete their course work while travelling the world or just sitting in an airport.

"They will do their reading on the mobile device, and in some cases they can actually take test questions and get immediate feedback."

Tapscott knows how he thinks the future should look: "Every kid has a laptop. They're clustered into groups. It's self-based interactive, student-focused, collaborative learning."

If so, then the future appears to be now at a pilot project beginning this year at Edmonton's St. Mary Elementary School.

About 100 Grade 5 and 6 students in four classes will be equipped with tablet PCs. With those detachable screens, they will be free to move about the wireless facility, doing homework or researching on the web in, say, the gym or library. Should learning stop because there's a system crash, IT staff are on site to get the students back online.

In the classroom, their desks are arranged in clusters to foster peer-to-peer and group problem-solving through a variety of tools like Smart Boards and LCD screens.

"We're not trying to get the technology to replace everything. We want it to be as an additional resource that helps student learning," said Joe Estephan, the teacher of the tablet PC Grade 6ers.

"Technology is the future and we need to catch up, and students are highly motivated when it comes to technology."

Ally and Tapscott say the challenge is not the technology.

"The biggest wall we have to knock down is the attitude of the teachers and some of the faculty to get them to actually use the devices," said Ally. "Some of them, because they've been in the system a long time, are kind of afraid to move toward the technology."

[doc30]

Never happen. NEA would oppose it because it would deny their ability to 'social engineer' the next generation into marxists.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Hard to believe the media is actually covering this.

The idea’s only been around for 30 years or so.

[LiteKeeper]

Welcome to the Homeschool philosophy of education

[ClearCase_guy]

I've been dreaming of this change for a long time. But I agree with you, there are a number of powerful reasons (*cough* unions *cough*)why this would be difficult to implement.

[Jersey Republican Biker Chick]

Pennsylvanoa has a lot of Cyber Schools.

http://www.thebulletin.us/site/printerFriendly.cfm?brd=2737&dept_id=576361&newsid=18716059

[VOA]

bump

[riverdawg]

I’ve heard for 50 years that some (usually, the “latest and greatest”) technology could/should/would “revolutionize” the learning process. Educational TV, self-paced learning, the Internet, blah, blah, blah. There is great value in watching someone at a (black or white) board go through the process of solving a math problem, for example, and responding to questions along the way. That’s hard to replicate in a book or on the Internet.

[econjack]

I’ve done both, but there’s no substitute for face-to-face instruction. Also, social interaction is an important element in the educational process. Finally, some people lack the self-discipline to be successful in a distance learning environment.

[Puppage]

Hard to believe the media is actually covering this

And, the Canadian media at that.

[Kevmo]

BMFLR

[subterfuge]

It’s inevitable. And I didn’t even read the article!!

[glorgau]

There is great value in watching someone at a (black or white) board go through the process of solving a math problem, for example, and responding to questions along the way. That’s hard to replicate in a book or on the Internet.

Actually, it's not. There are scads of conferencing applications available.

[luckystarmom]

I personally think there should be some regular school (sitting in a classroom with a teacher). I think math is one of those subjects that should be covered by a teacher.

I think science is another one that needs to be in the classroom (lab) with all sorts of hands on activities.

However, I think there are plenty of classes that don’t need to be in the classroom every day: history, reading, language arts. Even science could be limited to 2 days a week of lab time, and then a lot of work could be done on the computer.

Some kids work great in the classroom environment, and some kids don’t. I would like to see all sorts of options for education.

[familyop]

With other family members, I’ve done almost enough C++ software development training to begin doing contract jobs. Most employers/clients will have a problem with me, though. I dropped from a university program long ago after having had enough of man-hating rants from instructors. From computer science instructors’ notes around the Web, it is apparent that most are presenting effectively obsolete C library functions to students. Many students are also doing C courses before C++ courses (big no-no).

So we’ll most likely check the market for demands and likely needs then start our own project. And all of our training came from some of the best developers on earth, who put their books, notes and articles on the Internet. Yes, it all came from the Net. ;-)

So we’ll probably be rejected as employees, but we’re going to defeat the corporate/academic competition. ;-)

[riverdawg]

Videoconferencing was all the rage ten years ago, and there are some applications that have had some success, especially in the corporate world. But I’ve never seen it used wisely or effectively in an educational setting. In the early days, I attributed most of the failures to technical glitches - hardware or software problems. Now that those are minimal, I have concluded that there is something more fundamentally wrong about that approach for many, if not most, educational applications.