Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Only ten minutes on a mobile could trigger cancer, scientists believe
Daily Mail ^ | Aug.29,2007 | DAVID DERBYSHIRE

Posted on 08/30/2007 9:49:39 AM PDT by COUNTrecount

Mobile phones can take as little as ten minutes to trigger changes in the brain associated with cancer, scientists claimed yesterday.

They found even low levels of radiation from handsets interfere with the way brain cells divide. Cell division encourages the growth of tumours.

Although the researchers did not come up with evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful, the findings suggest they could be.

Several major studies have also found no link between mobile use and brain tumours, nor a dramatic rise in cancer rates.

But campaigners insist the discovery undermines official advice that the devices are safe.

The guidance is based on the assumption that the phones emit too little radiation to heat the brain dangerously.

However, the new study by the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel suggests "nonthermal" radiation could pose a risk.

The Israeli scientists exposed human and rat cells in a laboratory to low-level radiation at 875 megahertz - a similar frequency to the one used in many mobile phones.

Although the radiation was far weaker than emissions from a typical handset, it began to switch on a chemical signal inside the cells within ten minutes, the researchers report in the Biochemical Journal.

The chemical signals they detected were involved in the division of cells.

The researchers say the reaction was not caused by heating and claim they have found a separate way in which mobile phones could damage health.

Dr Rony Seger, a co-author of the study, told the magazine New Scientist: "The significance lies in showing cells do react to cellphone radiation in a non-thermal way."

Although changes in the chemical pathway seen by the Israeli scientists have been linked to several cancers, the researchers say there was no sign of a cancer-causing effect.

Dr Simon Arthur, a health expert at Dundee University, said the effect was 'unlikely to cause cancer'.

Dr Dariusz Leszczynski, of the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority in Helsinki, said: "If cell-phone radiation cannot induce biological effects then there will never be any health effects.

"On the other hand if we can show this radiation is able to induce biological effects then we have a different story."

A major review of mobile phone safety is due to be published by the Health Protection Agency next month.

The agency's last major report, in 2004, found no evidence mobiles were a serious health risk. It did, however, caution against excessive use, especially by the young.

Dr Michael Clark, a spokesman for the agency, said: "Because of findings like this that pop up from time to time, a precautionary approach is justified."

Graham Philips, of campaign group Powerwatch, said: "Safety guidelines assume health effects from mobiles can only occur when significant heating of body tissue occurs.

"This study shows biological changes in response to low-level mobile phone radiation - something that could potentially have implications for health.

"Further research is required, however guidance based purely on thermal effects is clearly out of date."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cellphones; health; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2007 9:49:40 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

CELL division.

Couldnt help myself.


2 posted on 08/30/2007 9:51:54 AM PDT by gun_supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Well, it was nice knowing you all.


3 posted on 08/30/2007 9:52:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Want authentic 1st century Christianity? Visit a local, New Testament Independent Baptist church!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
did not come up with evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful


4 posted on 08/30/2007 9:52:39 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Although the researchers did not come up with evidence that mobile phone signals are harmful, the findings suggest they could be.
Ah, the new scientific method invented by the AGW crowd is gaining currency throughout the scientific community. There's no evidence to back a theory, but there COULD be... !!!
5 posted on 08/30/2007 9:52:40 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

In other news ... Global warming is man made


6 posted on 08/30/2007 9:52:56 AM PDT by clamper1797 (Tonkin Gulf Yacht Club 72-73 ... USS Midway CVA-41 VA-93 Blue Blazers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Trial Lawyers too.


7 posted on 08/30/2007 9:53:48 AM PDT by Perdogg (Cheney for President 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

I counteract this by only calling from underneath high tension lines.


8 posted on 08/30/2007 9:53:56 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Well, that’s it for me. I’m gonna get under my desk, curl up in a fetal position and begin whimpering “No hope. No hope. No hope.”

Oh yeah, almost forgot - I’m gonna shoot my cellphone.


9 posted on 08/30/2007 9:54:43 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Americans never quit." Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

(chuckle)


10 posted on 08/30/2007 9:55:39 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Next they’ll come after wifi and make your laptop the bad guy.


11 posted on 08/30/2007 9:56:03 AM PDT by capt. norm (Be thankful we're not getting all the government we're paying for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Kills the honeybees, too. </ sarcasm>


12 posted on 08/30/2007 9:56:18 AM PDT by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim

Did you buy carbon credits first?


13 posted on 08/30/2007 9:56:21 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
"They found even low levels of radiation from handsets interfere with the way brain cells divide. Cell division encourages the growth of tumours."

They'd better hurry up and figure out howto stop cells from dividing then, plus there is that nasty thing that rises every morning beaming radiation down on us every day. That's it- nobody is allowed outside anymore. Especially the children.

14 posted on 08/30/2007 9:57:36 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Beer is the antidote to cell phone cancer. Why? Well, beer kills brain cells, but only the weak ones (like the ones that your cell phone signal messes up).

That's why I drive with my cell phone in one hand and a beer in the other... just to be safe.

15 posted on 08/30/2007 9:58:13 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

And they laughed at our hats!

16 posted on 08/30/2007 9:58:21 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus ("The stool pigeon is the coming race." - Jack Black, <i>You Can't Win</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gun_supporter
Cell division encourages the growth of tumours

This is the stupidest damn thing I've heard today! I got news. Cell division causes life you twit!

17 posted on 08/30/2007 10:00:01 AM PDT by KenHorse (It may be the only purpose of your life is to serve as a warning to others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

But - but - but - surely Algore and all his friends among the truly beautiful people can continue calling each other on their cell phones if only they buy some carbon credits from Algore’s carbon off-set business?


18 posted on 08/30/2007 10:00:04 AM PDT by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

That’s very prudent of you. You can’t be too careful these days.


19 posted on 08/30/2007 10:00:12 AM PDT by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gun_supporter
Cell division encourages the growth of tumours.

Well, when you start off with a scientific stunner like that, your credibility only goes up. So high nobody can see it.

20 posted on 08/30/2007 10:00:23 AM PDT by Comstock1 (If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson