Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Loan papers lost in translation
Contra Costa Times ^ | 8/24/7 | Barbara E. Hernandez

Posted on 08/24/2007 8:31:36 AM PDT by SmithL

Spanish-speaking couple sues, accuses entities involved with mortgage, of negligence, misrepresentation --

ANTIOCH -- When it came time to sign her mortgage documents, Judy Murillo said she heard something in English that made her stop signing. The terms of her loan didn't sound right.

"We weren't supposed to have Mello-Roos," she said, her brow furrowing as she sat at her dining room table.

Although Murillo speaks some English, she is more comfortable with Spanish, the language she and her husband used when communicating with her real estate agent, who was also her loan consultant, and his assistant. She said they had specifically been told by their agent that they wouldn't be part of a Mello-Roos district where homeowners pay a special tax for public improvements and services.

When trying to get confirmation from the title agent, who didn't speak Spanish fluently, she was told to talk to her Realtor for an explanation. She said neither their real estate agent, Francisco Cervantes, nor his assistant were present.

Faced with not signing and possibly losing the $450,000 house in Antioch, she and her husband, Juan, signed the papers.

Now, two years later, the Murillos and others are suing their real estate agent, his assistant and mortgage broker, alleging breach of fiduciary duties, fraud and misrepresentation, negligence and other violations.

They are also suing Wells Fargo, holder of their home-equity line of credit, which acts as their second mortgage, and JP Morgan Chase & Co., which now services their New Century Mortgage Corp. loan, accusing them of negligence and other violations of state and federal laws.

If there had been a law requiring a translated loan summary with the loan terms, percentage rate and fees, the Murillos said they probably would not be struggling to make their mortgage payment.

"What they told us wasn't true," Murillo, 31, said. "I know what is an advantage and what is not an advantage. ... And that's not what I heard and not what they said."

Heidi Li, an attorney for the families, said the real estate boom created some misrepresentation and even fraud, with many of those agents and brokers coming from the same cultural community.

The Murillos are part of the growing number of California home buyers who don't speak fluent English and could be helped by state law ensuring home loan documents with translated summaries disclosing mortgage terms, percentage rates and fees.

That law may not be AB512, a bill amending current contract law requiring home loan documents to be translated into Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Vietnamese and Korean if a broker or business negotiates in that language.

The bill, which passed 47-29 in the state Assembly in June, was supposed to include the summary of loan terms, but it was amended in July with the summary deleted. That version may reach the floor of the state Senate by next week, said a representative of Sen. Patricia Wiggins, D-Santa Rosa, whose district encompasses Solano, Napa and Sonoma counties.

Li, also a board member of the California Reinvestment Coalition, a coalition of groups that advocate access to credit on behalf of low-income communities, said that the bill in its current incarnation is too vague.

"As it is now currently drafted, it's going to create greater uncertainty," she said. "We believe it will reduce required disclosure documents to consumers."

The bill, if passed, wouldn't be law until at least January 2009 and not much help to those currently in difficult loans, said Paul Leonard, director of the Oakland-based California office at the Center for Responsible Lending.

"It doesn't do anything retroactively, that's for sure, and it's not clear how effective it will be," he said. "This is the biggest transaction in these people's lives, and they deserve to know the terms."

Cervantes, the Murillos' real estate agent and loan consultant named in the lawsuit, said that he has committed no wrongdoing.

"People think, 'I can buy a property and if things don't go well, I get to blame someone else.' That's the American way," Cervantes, a Realtor with Citywide Properties in San Jose and a loan consultant for First Federal Mortgage Bankers in Gilroy, said. "We explained everything to them. ... The whole process was according to the law."

Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., said: "Chase did not originate the loan. It is simply servicing the loan." Chris Hammond, a spokesman for Wells Fargo, said the company has no record of receiving the complaint.

The Murillos had credit scores of more than 700, and between the couple, and Judy Murillo's sister, Martha Jimenez, the three family members had $4,800 net income per month. Despite those positives, they ended up with an adjustable-rate mortgage that rose from a $2,800 monthly payment to $3,500.

Jimenez, 33, who pays $900 of her $1,600 monthly income toward the mortgage, said she hopes that the lender and her family can work out a deal.

"People get preyed upon by people from their own background," said Sen. Michael Machado, D-Linden, whose district includes parts of San Joaquin and Solano counties. "It's also difficult to counteract. When someone is taken in by someone in their own community, (it's hard to come forward and) say, 'I got duped.'"

Li said the Murillos are not technically in default of their loan, but their adjustable-rate mortgage is being negotiated with J.P. Chase Morgan & Co.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; attacklawyers; mortgage; spanishlanguage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last
Amalia Rios, left, and Judy Murillo, right, talk about her home mortgage troubles at the dining room table in Murillo's home in Antioch, Calif., on Wednesday July 18, 2007. Photo for story on two families who say they were misled by a broker into signing a mortgage without knowing what it really said because they speak limited English.
1 posted on 08/24/2007 8:31:39 AM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

They’re suing because THEY don’t understand the language.


2 posted on 08/24/2007 8:32:21 AM PDT by SmithL (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

1. Speak English.
2. Quit buying houses and moving everybody in your family into them. You’e killing our neighborhoods and property values.


3 posted on 08/24/2007 8:35:29 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
""People get preyed upon by people from their own background," said Sen. Michael Machado, D-Linden, whose district includes parts of San Joaquin and Solano counties."

Kind'a like democrat politicians, eh Mikey?

4 posted on 08/24/2007 8:39:13 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

Please tell me why I should synpathize with low income people who want a $450,000 home. I live in a $10,000 mobile home.


5 posted on 08/24/2007 8:41:38 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I though U.S. citizens were supposed to all know the English language. Am I missing something here?


6 posted on 08/24/2007 8:43:07 AM PDT by Joann37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I don’t know maybe it’s just me but several things just strike me as odd about this whole thing. First they have been in the house for about two years and they already have a second mortgage. What’s up with that? Second it took three people to qualify for this home? Once again I scratch my head in wonder. Nobody held a gun to these peoples heads and told them to sign the papers. Clearly they couldn’t afford the home in the first place and are now looking for an out and of course a lawyer is waiting in the wings to take the case. Why am I not surprised.

Kirbvy


7 posted on 08/24/2007 8:44:54 AM PDT by KirbDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joann37

Probably a legal resident, but not a citizen (hopefully).


8 posted on 08/24/2007 8:44:56 AM PDT by SJSAMPLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Who buys a house without hiring a lawyer?


9 posted on 08/24/2007 8:45:37 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KirbDog

Kirbvy = Kirby
Geez I can’t even spell my own name.


10 posted on 08/24/2007 8:46:28 AM PDT by KirbDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Photo for story on two families who say they were misled by a broker into signing a mortgage without knowing what it really said because they speak limited English.

Any sane court would throw this case into the street and sanction counsel for filing it.

11 posted on 08/24/2007 8:47:37 AM PDT by Petronski (Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Another forclosure in the making.


12 posted on 08/24/2007 8:49:43 AM PDT by ladtx ( "I don't know how I got over the hill without getting to the top." - - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

An excellent way to keep people in virtual shackles, deny them full participation in the economy and permanently dependent on government— is to encourage them not to bother to learn fluent english.


13 posted on 08/24/2007 8:50:31 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The moral is don’t lend to Hispanics.

If they can’t speak English, no loan.


14 posted on 08/24/2007 8:52:26 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Hillary's color is yellow.....how appropriate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
low income people who want a $450,000 home.

Actually in California that would be considered border line low income housing, especially being that close to the Bay Area. It's all out of whack.

15 posted on 08/24/2007 8:53:17 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They had it planned from the getgo.

Get creative to qualify and then blame the fact that they can’t pay the loan back on the FACT they don’t want to learn English.


16 posted on 08/24/2007 8:53:24 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (No buy China!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
the three family members had $4,800 net income per month. Despite those positives, they ended up with an adjustable-rate mortgage that rose from a $2,800 monthly payment to $3,500.

Stupid in any language. $2,800 on a $4,800 take home pay? Even if the rate was fixed that would be an incredible amount of money.

If I were going to Mexico to buy some property, there is no way I would go in without my own representative (probably a lawyer) who spoke English and Spanish.

17 posted on 08/24/2007 8:54:53 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

If YOU don’t understand the loan documents, it’s YOUR responsibility to find a translator who can read them to you BEFORE you sign.


18 posted on 08/24/2007 8:55:38 AM PDT by californianmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

The only question that is relevant is how many “sane” courts are left in this nation. The price for legislating from the courts is a loss of justice from the courts.


19 posted on 08/24/2007 8:56:42 AM PDT by kublia khan (Absolute war brings total victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Despite those positives, they ended up with an adjustable-rate mortgage
that rose from a $2,800 monthly payment to $3,500.”

They got greedy.
They snapped up a deal that any rational (non-greedy) person would
have said “that deal very likely go sour when the rate readjusts upward”.

Boo-freakin’-hoo.


20 posted on 08/24/2007 8:58:26 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson