Skip to comments.
Log cabin turned to fortress for N America summit (Three Amigos summit nonsense)
AFP Via BreitBart ^
| 8-20-07
Posted on 08/20/2007 2:44:49 PM PDT by 14themunny
The leaders of Canada, the United States and Mexico will meet Monday for a two-day summit to bolster trilateral trade and security, far from the hostile gaze of demonstrators.
In Montebello, a fence three meters (10 feet) high and running 2.5 kilometers (1.5 miles) around the meeting place has been erected to keep the protestors out.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Canada; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico
KEYWORDS: amero; bush; mexico; nafta; northamericanunion; sppsummit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
So our President is going to sneak off to a cabin to discuss matters that are vital to all of us, in secret, surrounded by a fence to keep the opposition out. I see....
To Bush and Calderon, "border security" has to do with bringing as many illegals across in a secure manner. This is sick. This is not representative government.
To: 14themunny; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
New here, eh?
2
posted on
08/20/2007 3:02:36 PM PDT
by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: 14themunny
” to keep the protestors out.”
It has to be that high because there are millions of us!
3
posted on
08/20/2007 3:04:56 PM PDT
by
RoadTest
(You don’t make the poor richer by making the rich poorer.” —Winston Churchill)
To: 14themunny
You must be mistaken,
Why would anyone use a fence to keep someone “out”?
4
posted on
08/20/2007 3:05:57 PM PDT
by
pfony1
To: fanfan
Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of reasons to be joined with Canada-- I can think of three real quick:
But Mexico??!!!!
To: 14themunny
No problem building a wall to keep the riff-raff out, I see.
6
posted on
08/20/2007 3:12:02 PM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: toddlintown
No problem building a wall to keep the riff-raff out, I see. Anyone crossing that border is trying to do the job the North American leaders wont do.
7
posted on
08/20/2007 3:14:59 PM PDT
by
Duke Nukum
(...no more I follow, no more obedience pay.)
To: 14themunny
So our President is going to sneak off to a cabin to discuss matters that are vital to all of us, in secret, surrounded by a fence to keep the opposition out. I see.... This smacks of the giveaways that Roosevelt presented to Stalin at Yalta.
8
posted on
08/20/2007 3:15:21 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
To: 14themunny
So our President is going to sneak off to a cabin to discuss matters that are vital to all of us, in secret, surrounded by a fence to keep the opposition out.
You'd rather have a bunch of potentially violent anti-Bush protesters sitting on the front lawn instead?
Thank God you're not in the Secret Service.
9
posted on
08/20/2007 3:17:02 PM PDT
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: 14themunny
So our President is going to sneak off ......
Sneak off?
Ya, sure.
No one knows Bush is going to meet with Stephen Harper and the President of Mexico.
The press has been covering it up.
Troll.
10
posted on
08/20/2007 3:18:53 PM PDT
by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: 14themunny
I like this idea a LOT better than some supernational end-run around the Constitution.
United North America (Canada + USA)
There is already a process for gaining more territory for the USA. If Canada and Mexico want to join, let them petition as states for entry into the USA like Texas and California did.
11
posted on
08/20/2007 3:19:07 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
To: 14themunny
vs.
12
posted on
08/20/2007 3:22:02 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: Centurion2000
The Isthmus of Panama would be a lot easier to defend than the Rio Grande, though...
13
posted on
08/20/2007 3:24:11 PM PDT
by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: 14themunny
14
posted on
08/20/2007 3:24:29 PM PDT
by
skeeter
To: 14themunny
Yeah, the cabin is probably owned by the Bilderbergers, too.
15
posted on
08/20/2007 3:31:37 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(I'm unmoderated - just ask Bill O'Reilly)
To: 14themunny
Log Cabin Republicans?...............
16
posted on
08/20/2007 3:45:39 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: 14themunny
Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of reasons to be joined with Canada
Not until they learn to pronounce the words "about" or "house".
17
posted on
08/20/2007 3:55:15 PM PDT
by
Jaysun
(It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
To: rfp1234
The Isthmus of Panama would be a lot easier to defend than the Rio Grande, though... So would a deep trench made from buried thermonuclear charges.
Just repeat this a few thousand times and make a big radioactive trench .... no problem.
18
posted on
08/20/2007 4:23:45 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(“Jesus Saves. Moses Delivers. Cthulu Reposesses...”)
To: Jaysun
Hey, I got to have brunch with fanfan. She did say house right!!!!!
Aboot, well people from the south sound funny, you know!!!
19
posted on
08/20/2007 6:41:54 PM PDT
by
Springman
(Why is ? coming up, when I use ')
To: 14themunny
Tres Amigos? o Tres Pendejos?
20
posted on
08/20/2007 6:46:18 PM PDT
by
stboz
(I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson