Just ask Glenn Frey:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MW4oaVeDHE4
What a load!!
The female examples are so skanky ANYTHING/BODY is an object of “love”.
This needs a barf alert.
Well how much of it is real and how much of it is an act for publicity.
So, we have managed to generate a generation of bi-sexual ho’s.
Just for the sake of humanity, I would be happy to supply my address to any of these curiosity-seekers.
I need to scan the tabloids better while in the checkout lane, I missed the S&M.
"Uber-masculine?" He looks like a little boy.
...so much for that “born gay” business.
Defy labels?
Here’s a few labels for those women.
WHORES. SLUTS.
nothing new.
the french realist painter gustave courbet portrayed lesbians.
it went along with his radical politics.
Bring back the 1950’s! When sex was dirty and it MEANT something.
Folks, we’re all hyperomnitransexual now, so get over it.
>>The stars who flaunt their so-called lesbian status then change their minds may make it difficult for a new generation of young women who reject the dogmatic definitions of sexuality.<<
There is nothing dogmatic about commitment between a man and a woman. In order for a relationship between a man and a woman to work, both people need to bring to the table attitudes such as understanding, devotion, fidelity, and maturity. Even in the era of easy contraception, sex between a man and a woman always carries with it the potential for the creation of new life, and when that new life is created, many people experience emotional growth, newfound respect for life, and a deep and abiding bond with their partner.
Lesbian relationships create none of those possibilities, since the linchpin of the lesbian relationship is creation of orgasm, not another human being. Since both partners are the same sex, the give-and-take which comes from living with someone of the opposite sex is missing. In other words, the lesbian relationship allows these young women to act out sexually while forgoing any maturity or emotional commitment. It seems that its a female version of the “Peter Pan” syndrome, although in this case it is the little girls who refuse to grow up.
Incidentially, in Canada this posting would be considered homophobic hate speech. Similar laws are being proposed in the United States.
Shouldn’t this read a “Few women” or even “some women”?
Stop the world and let me off.
There was a study that showed that hetero women view hetero and lesbian porn in much of the same way (by examining the activity of the brain and monitoring other responses). Hetero men didn’t respond in the same way to gay porn at all. The difference was very measurable. Women recognize other women as being hot. Men don’t really have the same recognition in regards to men.
Sex between two women is beautiful, as long as you chose the right two women. Nyuk, nyuk.
I think what this stems from is the “Girls Gone Wild” generation growing up with easy access to images normalizing women with women for strictly recreational purposes, and boyfriends eagerly supporting the behavior for their own benefit. I’d be willing to bet that other types of behaviors glorified in the porn movies are more prevalent, as well. I truly feel sorry for some of these kids who are jaded and have “seen and done everything” by the time they leave high school. Makes it tough for a kid to properly rebel!
The slutification of our girls continues...