http://www.conservativeunderground.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1965372
bump
The guy is obviously lying about the details, but he's got a point that some of this evangelizing is a bit over the top.
You’ll see that a lot from mainstream liberals and on here from the poseurs. It’s a good sign of a liberal lurker. When confronted with facts they will:
Launch into an obtuse diatribe that has nothing to do with what was asked of them.
Issue a personal insult about your; character, family, inclination towards things when they don’t know you personally.
Assign you a tag: Rascist, homophobe, redneck, etc.
It’s just typical.
It would seem that the makers of the game could sue this dirtbag “journalist” for something.
Write to the editor, and to the editors of their competitors in the local market. there is nothing they would prefer than to make their competition look like fools and liars.
Partisan shill should be fired and blackballed.
Maybe the reporter accidentally set his game to “Muslim”.
His response:
"Thank you for such an informational and educational letter. Thanks for taking the time to respond intelligenty. You bring up very good and valid points but I don't have time to argue.
Truly,"
"Journalists"...
Are you calling liberals out on their lies? You know it makes them go all “Squirmey!”
Check this out (Warning — may raise blood pressure):
http://humaniststudies.org/enews/images/left_behind_screenshot.jpg
http://humaniststudies.org/enews/index.php?id=279&article=2
Silly rabbit! Lying is ok when you are trying to get the ‘truth’ out.
if the point of the article was that soldiers don’t need further evangelizing, why didn’t s/he say that to begin with instead of saying what they don’t need is more ‘holy wars?’ There is a difference.
Did this writer give proper attribution to the original Nation article? Or was s/he plagarizing? That’s a no-no even in the moonbat commuunity.