Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who can't get a mortgage now
http://money.cnn.com/2007/08/10/real_estate/mortgage_rates/index.htm?postversion=2007081017 ^ | 8-10-07 | Steve Hargreaves

Posted on 08/11/2007 4:58:13 AM PDT by Hydroshock

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The stock market is going crazy. Hedge funds are going under. But for the average American looking for a home loan, the crisis in the subprime mortgage market may actually be good news.

"Not only is it nothing to worry about, it's an absolute positive," said Loni Graiver, president of the Maine-based Cumberland County Mortgage. "Not only have [home] valuations come down, but [interest rates] are still historically low."

Rates on 30-year fixed loans dipped last week, to 6.41 percent, according to the Mortgage Banker's Association.

In addition, tightened lending standards stemming from the subprime crisis likely mean fewer buyers, pushing down home prices.

The one catch is this: You've got to be a buyer with good credit, a low debt to income ratio, a healthy down payment, verifiable income, and looking to finance less than $417,000 (the cutoff for so-called jumbo loans).

Those characteristics basically define someone who qualifies for a loan through a government program like Fannie Mae, which makes up about 50 percent of all outstanding mortgages, according to Guy Cecala, publisher of the industry newsletter Inside Mortgage Finance.

(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: credit; fraud; mortgage; mortgagebrokers; subprime; vulturegram
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2007 4:58:15 AM PDT by Hydroshock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock; Moonman62; ex-Texan
Surprise, surprise, if you have a decent down payment, closing costs, and and good credit you can get a good loan. Ping the Capt. Obvious picture
2 posted on 08/11/2007 5:00:10 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Looks like sanity has returned, at least for a while..........


3 posted on 08/11/2007 5:02:01 AM PDT by Red Badger (All I know about Minnesota, I learned from Garrison Keilor.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Maybe, but I am still in wait and see mode. Real estate and mortgage sales droids can be creative.


4 posted on 08/11/2007 5:04:57 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Maybe, but I am still in wait and see mode. Real estate and mortgage sales droids can be creative.

Yep, just give 'em some time......

5 posted on 08/11/2007 5:07:12 AM PDT by Thermalseeker (Made in China: Treat those three words like a warning label)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
“The one catch is this: You’ve got to be a buyer with good credit, a low debt to income ratio, a healthy down payment, verifiable income, and looking to finance less than $417,000”

In other words, you can’t be a Demoncratic voter.

6 posted on 08/11/2007 5:19:21 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

All of this is making homes more affordable for young, first-time home buyers. Here on Long Island many older residents (myself included) have seen the real values of their homes decline.

However, if you take a longer view, what future does a community have if young families cannot afford to stay?

My advice to young people looking for their first homes:

Negotiate hard.


7 posted on 08/11/2007 5:20:12 AM PDT by joeystoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock; Thermalseeker
mortgage sales droids can be creative

True enough but they had little to do with the current troubles. Worldwide acceptance of risk shot up these past few years. Those risky mortgages were packaged into securities and sold to investment bankers and individuals who demanded high rates of interest regardless of risk.

8 posted on 08/11/2007 5:21:32 AM PDT by Jacquerie (The New Republic - Every bit as reputable as CBS News.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Ping the Capt. Obvious picture

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Glad to oblige.

9 posted on 08/11/2007 5:23:07 AM PDT by bcsco ("The American Indians found out what happens when you don't control immigration.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

MY father was a contractor, homebuilder and had a RE licence in TX for over 30 years. We had a talk about this over Christmas. He said, “There is a name for a person who is buying a house with no money down and paying interest only, they are called renters. But in fact they are worse off then renters, they have to maintain the property and pay taxes adn insurance.”


10 posted on 08/11/2007 5:25:14 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The one catch is this: You've got to be a buyer with good credit, a low debt to income ratio, a healthy down payment, verifiable income, and looking to finance less than $417,000 (the cutoff for so-called jumbo loans).

isn't this the same way our moms and dads bought their house?

11 posted on 08/11/2007 5:29:35 AM PDT by JohnLongIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland

I would never buy a house unless I could put at least 10% down plus closing costs, and afford 120% of the total payment on a 30 year fixed. And perferrably a 15 year.


12 posted on 08/11/2007 5:31:56 AM PDT by Hydroshock ("The Constitution should be taken like mountain whiskey -- undiluted and untaxed." - Sam Ervin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
The under jumbo limit is my market.

IMO, we'll start seeing a lot more FHA buyers.

Maximum of 3% required into the deal...and financed (tacked on) mortgage insurance.

Appraisals will be getting 2nd and 3rd looks...past sales with seller subsidies will be scrutinized before they can be valid comps.

Been through this before...

13 posted on 08/11/2007 5:34:02 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

I talked to the bank about a commercial mortgage yesterday - 7% , 25 year fixed “shouldn’t be a problem”.


14 posted on 08/11/2007 5:34:49 AM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Depends on where you live. Here in GSO, NC it’s still cheaper to buy with 0% and pay taxes & insurance than to rent and you are at least building equity and don’t have to worry about re-negotiating a contract each 6m/1y. At least in most forms of houses/condos/apartments that get rented/purchased. It might be different on the high end (rent/mortgage over 2k a month) but there is very little of that here anyway.


15 posted on 08/11/2007 5:35:49 AM PDT by rb22982
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock

Bump!


16 posted on 08/11/2007 5:36:54 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnLongIsland
Um no, they paid $30,000, kids today are expected to pay $300,000. Just a little thing you know, like that.
17 posted on 08/11/2007 5:38:17 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joeystoy

Good advice, but I’d add one thing. Only buy what you can afford. Younger couples today do not look at “starter homes.” They want their first home to be just like mom and dad’s that they got after starting low and moving up.


18 posted on 08/11/2007 5:38:41 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hydroshock
Yes, those are all prudent measures. The thing is, based on them the portion of Americans who could afford a house at present prices is oh, about two thirds of the number of houses. The prices are simply too high by a factor of 3/2 at least (other than a few markets that didn't move, like west Texas e.g.).
19 posted on 08/11/2007 5:40:44 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
The prices do not vary within regions, they vary by region. A tiny shack around San Francisco runs $600,000 (land value sees to that), while a fine large house in Lubbock, TX runs $150,000. People can't pick where the jobs are, however. Affordable new homes are concentrated in a few regions of the country, but jobs are not.

So in practice e.g. in Boston what happens is young professionals do not buy - they rent, and 4 to a house.

20 posted on 08/11/2007 5:43:37 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson