Skip to comments.
Global warming will step up after 2009: scientists
Reuters via Yahoo ^
| 2007 Aug 09
| Deborah Zabarenko
Posted on 08/09/2007 1:52:23 PM PDT by Brujo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
The old hockey stick projection. No change in the immediate future, but, boy, is it going to go up Real Soon Now.
(By the way, didn't NASA recant and now 1934 is the hottest year on record?
1
posted on
08/09/2007 1:52:24 PM PDT
by
Brujo
To: Brujo
...well it’s nice of global warming to wait until Hillary takes the White House....
2
posted on
08/09/2007 1:53:34 PM PDT
by
Tzimisce
(How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
To: Brujo
Ill Gladly Pay You Tomorrow for a Hamburger Today
3
posted on
08/09/2007 1:54:26 PM PDT
by
1rudeboy
(I can't explain why I thought of it.)
To: Brujo
IOW, far enough out that everyone will have forgotten this proclamation by the time it comes due (and doesn’t happen).
4
posted on
08/09/2007 1:55:09 PM PDT
by
Little Pig
(Is it time for "Cowboys and Muslims" yet?)
To: Brujo
Once this record cool summer is over, “global warming” will resume, eh?
(Record cool here in North Texas, anyway; it hasn’t yet hit 100 here this year)
5
posted on
08/09/2007 1:55:24 PM PDT
by
Redbob
(WWJBD - "What would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: Brujo
To: Brujo
If the following all were true, I’ll admit I’d be concerned:
1. the world really is going to heat up “dramatically” after 2009;
2. this is a man-made cause — or, at least, is more than minimally so, as opposed to being due to historically normal non-andropogenic actions (sun cycles, production of greenhouse gases by animals, plants, volcanoes); and
3. the warming will have a NET OVERALL negative effect on human quality of life.
I believe none of these things as of today. I’m open minded, but until someone convinces me of all 3, I cannot be simultaneously (1) emotionally honest and (2) worried.
7
posted on
08/09/2007 1:57:36 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: Brujo
made a computer model that takes into account such natural phenomena as the El Nino
Add a few hundred more variables and maybe their model will get interesting.
8
posted on
08/09/2007 1:57:43 PM PDT
by
P-40
(Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
To: Brujo
... So stop bothering us about the fact that nothing is happening between now and the 2008 US Presidential Elections. The Apocalypse is scheduled for right after the Inauguration.
9
posted on
08/09/2007 1:58:19 PM PDT
by
gridlock
(You cannot coexist with somebody who wants you dead.)
To: Brujo
Guesswork about the future warming or cooling trends of the Late Great Planet Earth will be about as thick as fleas at the dog pound.
10
posted on
08/09/2007 1:58:50 PM PDT
by
Knute
(Tell me again ONE good reason I'm living here in Wisconsin??)
To: SunkenCiv
Possible Catastrophism ping.
11
posted on
08/09/2007 1:59:10 PM PDT
by
Brujo
(Quod volunt, credunt.)
To: Redbob
Record cool summers are evidence of global warming — didn’t you get the memo?
To: Brujo
which represents a key planning horizon
Very clever...tell US that global warming is gonna really kick in UNLESS we start taking care of it now, you know with a key planning horizon (tax, tax and tax!) and then when it doesn't happen they can say "see, better keep up with that planning horizon (tax) b/c it really worked"
13
posted on
08/09/2007 1:59:27 PM PDT
by
socialismisinsidious
( The socialist income tax system turns US citizens into beggars or quitters!)
To: Brujo; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
![](http://lrllamas.com/junkscience_logo.png)
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH
Ping me if you find one I've missed.
Bravo Siera
14
posted on
08/09/2007 1:59:38 PM PDT
by
xcamel
("It's Talk Thompson Time!" >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: Brujo
To make this kind of prediction, researchers at Britain's Met Office -- which deals with meteorology -- made a computer model that A computer model. What a surprise.
15
posted on
08/09/2007 1:59:41 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
To: Brujo
Especially if Hillary becomes president.
Expect to see a Global Warming Czar...maybe even...Al Gore.
16
posted on
08/09/2007 2:00:09 PM PDT
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
To: P-40
Add a few hundred more variables and maybe their model will get interesting.A few hundred thousand more, perhaps.
17
posted on
08/09/2007 2:00:19 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Impeach Chertoff and Gonzales. We can't wait until 2009 for them to be gone.)
To: Brujo
Liberals always think that the world is static not dynamic. Cut taxes and you will get deficits... that is until the increase in spending in capital equipment makes things cheaper and jobs are created generating MORE revenue that was lost.
They view global temperatures in the same way, static not dynamic. An increase in global temperature as always progressing, unless its just another interglacial period that will be followed by the coming ice age.
18
posted on
08/09/2007 2:00:32 PM PDT
by
Mikey_1962
(If Roger Maris got an asterisk next to his name, Bonds should get a syringe)
To: pogo101
Edit: andro- should be anthro-.
19
posted on
08/09/2007 2:03:15 PM PDT
by
pogo101
To: finnman69
I think you hit the nail.
20
posted on
08/09/2007 2:03:50 PM PDT
by
SolidWood
(UN delenda est.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson