Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Medved - Why Not Bomb Mecca?
Townhall.com ^ | August 8, 2007 | Michael Medved

Posted on 08/08/2007 2:22:03 PM PDT by HAL9000

Excerpt -

In a desperate effort to revive his floundering presidential campaign, Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo has returned to his unhinged and wildly irresponsible discussion of punitive bombing of Muslim holy sites in Saudi Arabia.

On “This Week” on ABC, he suggested that such threats against Mecca and Medina could serve to deter Islamic terrorists from staging nuclear attacks on the United States. In the Republican debate of August 5th, Representative Tancredo portentously intoned: “I read the national intelligence estimate. I see what they are planning. And I’m telling you right now that anybody that would suggest that we should take anything like this off the table in order to deter that kind of event in the Untied States isn’t fit to be president of the United States.”

His declaration drew warm applause from the Iowa audience, and many conservatives across the country (including numerous callers to my radio show) feel instinctively sympathetic to any pledge to use decisive force against our Islamist adversaries.

Rational consideration of Tancredo’s proposal, however, leads inevitably, inescapably to one of two conclusions:

1) He wants the United States to make empty threats that no Commander-in-Chief would ever dare to implement, or

2) He honestly expects our government to respond to a devastating terrorist attack with a course of action guaranteed to increase, rather than reduce, the chance of future assaults, while pushing our economy into ruinous chaos.

~ snip ~


(Excerpt) Read more at michaelmedved.townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: islam; mecca; medved; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last
This article is an excellent analysis of Tancredo's irresponsible remarks, which have zero value as a deterrent, and will only provoke more terrorism.

Tancredo and Obama should learn how to keep their motor-mouths under control before they inflict more damage to our national security.

1 posted on 08/08/2007 2:22:06 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Tancredo and Obama should learn how to keep their motor-mouths under control before they inflict more damage to our national security.

Dittos to that.

2 posted on 08/08/2007 2:24:12 PM PDT by Tribune7 (Michael Moore bought Haliburton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
which have zero value as a deterrent, and will only provoke more terrorism

Absolutely. Actually, if you want to INCREASE terrorism, go ahead and bomb Mecca. That will do the trick.

3 posted on 08/08/2007 2:25:33 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
As a strategy, it is best to keep the Islamic community divided. Bombing of a holy site would give them something to unify behind.
4 posted on 08/08/2007 2:26:33 PM PDT by mnehring (Ron Paul is as much of a Constitutionalist as Fred Phelps is a Christian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

It may reveal more targets, err, I mean incite terrorism, but it would be a good start and no different than what ROP followers have done to Christian and other religious sites for centuries.


5 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:07 PM PDT by DonaldC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
An alternate view: The Doctrine of Collective Responsibility
6 posted on 08/08/2007 2:28:32 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo (There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Unfortunately, every square inch of any raghead country has some *holiest* of whatever so it is practically impossible to not piss the savages off.

Just to make a point.


7 posted on 08/08/2007 2:29:03 PM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

Exactly. Want to really increase our issues, get every Mmuslim here pissed off over night.


8 posted on 08/08/2007 2:29:06 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Here’s a better plan: Quietly tell the Saudi Royal Family to deny the Islamonazi extremists access to Mecca, or else we’ll nuke the Royal Palace.


9 posted on 08/08/2007 2:29:36 PM PDT by lesser_satan (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Look, on general principles I agree that Tancredo’s remarks were intemperate. If we did bomb Mecca on a whim, it would certainly be ill-advised.

What would we say if two or three of our large cities were nuked and Islamic terrorists took credit? If it were confirmed, I think we’re playing under a different set of rules.

I do think that at some point you put all options on the table. I do not think waving that flag around intemperately prematurely is productive, and that’s where I fault Tancredo.


10 posted on 08/08/2007 2:29:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: doodad

Yeah, but Mecca would even drive the “straights” among the Muslim population nuts...


12 posted on 08/08/2007 2:30:09 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Tancredo’s never going to be president and I’m pretty sure he knows that. So it’s not the same when he speaks as when Osamabama speaks, since Osamabama has a very good chance of getting into the WH as the shoe-shine-boy-VP to Her Big Fat Thighness.

Tancredo’s on the political periphery and he probably knows that.

Given such outsider status, what’s wrong with putting the idea out there that we just MIGHT bomb Mecca if the justification is there?

Remember, we’re not dealing with high intelligence here, on the part of the intended audience. We’re dealing with sh1t-wrapped-in-rags. Vivid imagery might be the only thing that gets through to them.

What’s wrong with adding a measure of doubt in the sh1t-for-brains portion of the world’s population?


13 posted on 08/08/2007 2:30:24 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
In reality virtually all Moslems are brought up under a belief system that cannot be differentiated from slavery (from the inside).

Islam does, after all, mean "submission".

This has enabled a small minority of psycho-sociopathic madmen to regularly seize power in any Moslem country and bend the people to his will where he loots and plunders.

Bombing Mecca affects only the wealthy elites in the ruling class. No one else can afford to make the trip ~ well, with a couple of exceptions. American Moslems can afford to go, as can European Moslems. The poor people in Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia cannot.

I doubt the broad masses would care about it more than ten minutes.

14 posted on 08/08/2007 2:30:34 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

True. Which is why Akmed’s falafel stand that mo shat it might do instead. And we save a nuke.


15 posted on 08/08/2007 2:31:40 PM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doodad

Cuts down on overhead, that’s for sure...


16 posted on 08/08/2007 2:32:41 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I am not really a Fred basher, I am a Paulitroll. THOMPSON 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RedStateRocker

Heh heh heh.


17 posted on 08/08/2007 2:33:23 PM PDT by karnage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Tancredo is done, not that he had a chance to begin with.


18 posted on 08/08/2007 2:33:36 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
The reason Tancredo's plan won't work is because we will not carry out such a threat, and our enemies know it. Deterrence doesn't work if your enemy doesn't believe you.

As for it unifying the islamic world against us, well, it's like this: most muslims aren't terrorists, but the vast majority think terrorism against us is just fine. They are enablers of terrorism. As far as they are concerned, it's not their problem so they just continue to enable terrorism. Say what you want about Tancredo, but threatening Mecca would do one thing: it would make it their problem. That might mean fighting the entire middle east, but I'm increasingly becoming convinced that we may not be able to win this war if we aren't willing and able to do just that. I hope I'm wrong on that count.

There is a possible solution. We need to do something to re-establish our credibility. We need the other side to believe that we can and will carry out any threat that we make. Once we have that, it may prove useful to make the threat Tancredo is suggesting. Right now, though, it would be a disaster for us.
19 posted on 08/08/2007 2:35:36 PM PDT by JamesP81 (Keep your friends close; keep your enemies at optimal engagement range)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If I were running for president, here is the limit I'd be willing to go on-record with:

"If the government of Saudi Arabia is overthrown by al-Qaida, the United States reserves the option of using military force in the area."

And leave it at that.

20 posted on 08/08/2007 2:36:05 PM PDT by HAL9000 (http://LinksToNewsSources.GooglePages.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-264 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson