Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hawaii Supreme Court Blocks Voter-Passed Property Tax Relief
Pacific Legal Foundation ^ | August 7, 2007 | Robert Thomas

Posted on 08/07/2007 4:58:53 PM PDT by republicpictures

HONOLULU, HI; August 7, 2007: A voter-enacted measure that would have reined in skyrocketing property taxes on the island of Kauai was struck down by the Hawaii Supreme Court yesterday. The court permitted local government officials to challenge the “Ohana Kauai” tax-limitation measure by essentially suing themselves – in a lawsuit in which the government was both plaintiff and defendant and the same attorneys represent both sides. The court also ruled that the state constitution does not permit anyone but government officials to establish tax policy.

“We’re disappointed that the court allowed this fabricated lawsuit to go forward,” said Pacific Legal Foundation Attorney Robert Thomas, who represented homeowners who sponsored the Ohana Kauai measure. “This decision represents a real loss to the people of Kauai. It has told them that their votes don’t count, and that if government officials disagree with a result, they can create lawsuits against themselves, funded by public money, asking a court to strike down a vote.”

“This decision says that it is government officials who have the exclusive say on property taxes, not the people who pay them,” Thomas continued.

Sponsored by the homeowners’ group, “Ohana Kauai,” and approved in 2004 by an overwhelming majority of voters on the island of Kauai, the measure would have amended the county charter to keep a check on property taxes, which have been rising at astronomical rates. Property taxes would have been restored to 1998 levels for owner-occupied homes of residents who had owned their properties since at least 1998, and for homeowners who purchased after 1998, the tax level would be based on purchase price. Future tax increases for all resident homeowners could not exceed 2% per year.

But instead of implementing the charter amendment, Kauai officials sued each other to invalidate it, with the county attorney representing both sides of the case. The officials claimed they alone had power to decide property tax issues, and hired private attorneys with over $250,000 of public funds to litigate the lawsuit.

After the Circuit Court invalidated the amendment, attorneys for Pacific Legal Foundation came in to represent members of Ohana Kauai in an appeal to the Hawaii Supreme Court.

This week’s 3-2 decision by the Supreme Court held both that the peculiar posture of the case – with the county suing itself – was valid, and that only government officials, not the citizens of the counties, may set property tax policy.

Associate Justice Simeon R. Acoba, Jr., in a dissent joined by Associate Justice James E. Duffy, Jr., criticized the majority for allowing a lawsuit to go forward in which the original parties were the County of Kauai (as plaintiff) and the Kauai County Council (as defendant), with the County Attorney representing both sides.

“With all due respect, our role is to protect the judicial process, not to subvert it,” wrote Justice Acoba.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: govwatch; hawaii; hi; judiciary; pacificlegal; propertyrights; propertytaxes; ruling; tax; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 08/07/2007 4:58:54 PM PDT by republicpictures
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Constitution - stupid Haole piece of parchment...


2 posted on 08/07/2007 5:01:32 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

this is a clear signal that it is time...

we the people need to control the beast of government.

lock and load.

teeman8r


3 posted on 08/07/2007 5:01:53 PM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Uh I think I understand this. See it goes like this. I’m an elected official who is on the public dole to represent said public for their best interests. The majority of that public makes a decision which effects my paycheck.

So I sue myself, represent myself, defend myself and ignore the people who are paying me so I can keep myself in power.

And this is democratic?


4 posted on 08/07/2007 5:12:03 PM PDT by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Hmmmm...did’nt some of us fight a war over this already?!!!


5 posted on 08/07/2007 5:12:49 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: teeman8r

“this is a clear signal that it is time...

we the people need to control the beast of government.

lock and load.”

Not necessary yet. Boot the current officials out, and put new ones in their place who know who they work for.


6 posted on 08/07/2007 5:12:54 PM PDT by Old Student (We have a name for the people who think indiscriminate killing is fine. They're called "The Bad Guys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
Uh I think I understand this. See it goes like this. I’m an elected official who is on the public dole to represent said public for their best interests.

And don't forget the part where you call yourself a "public servant" while at the same time making a far larger income than those you "serve".

7 posted on 08/07/2007 5:15:15 PM PDT by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Another example of fascism without the personal charm of a Hitler or a Mussolini, but with a touch of Kafka.


8 posted on 08/07/2007 5:16:29 PM PDT by docbnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures
Hawaii has always been a liberal bastion. They elect very left wing liberal representatives who in turn appoint very left wing liberal Judges. The people of Hawaii have made their bed, now they can lie in it.

the peculiar nature of party dynamics in state politics. Hawaii is virtually a one-party state, ruled by a pervasively liberal Democratic elite since 1954.

http://www.leaderu.com/ftissues/ft9704/articles/coolidge.html

Hawaii Supreme Court: The unborn are 'not human beings'

9 posted on 08/07/2007 5:16:48 PM PDT by lowbridge ("We control this House, not the parliamentarians!” -Congressman Steny Hoyer (D))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Coup d’etat by lawyer tyrants. Hawaii isn’t the only place in the USA to have lost its democracy.


10 posted on 08/07/2007 5:17:03 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures
The answer is for Kauai to vote in different legislators.

Will they do that? No. They love the Dems.

11 posted on 08/07/2007 5:17:20 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

Sounds like the tree of liberty in Hawaii needs a little shake!


12 posted on 08/07/2007 5:20:45 PM PDT by meyer (It's the entitlements, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures

“Hey, how about a nice Hawaiian Pinch???”


13 posted on 08/07/2007 5:24:18 PM PDT by golas1964 (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures
This week’s 3-2 decision by the Supreme Court held both that the peculiar posture of the case – with the county suing itself – was valid, and that only government officials, not the citizens of the counties, may set property tax policy."

LOL!

"Errrr, duh.....only the King may set taxes....."

"Yes, but, oh royal one....we elected the King".....

"Duh....Well, errrr, we most follow policy!"

"Your holiness, we the serfs have said we don't want to tax ourselves into, errrr, serfdom"

"Dumb serf, go elect a different , errrr, government....this one has spoken. Except for me....I'm here for life.....dumb serf...;(

14 posted on 08/07/2007 5:25:39 PM PDT by ScreamingFist (Annihilation - The result of underestimating your enemies. NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicpictures
Reminds me of Berthold Brecht's comment after the Soviet suppression of the 1953 East German uprising, that the government had decided to dissolve the people and elect a new one.

I really do not think hanging is too extreme for politicians who pull self-serving anti-democratic tricks like this. Tar and feathers and horsewhips, at the very least!

-ccm

15 posted on 08/07/2007 5:40:23 PM PDT by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

When they start taxing you out of your own home..then people finally revolt. CA did it with Prop 13. Sooner or later the people will win.


16 posted on 08/07/2007 5:44:38 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
And this is democratic?

No, this is Democratic.

"The first thing we do, we kill all the lawyers..."

17 posted on 08/07/2007 5:47:28 PM PDT by Old Sarge (This tagline in memory of FReeper 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: malia

Ping.


18 posted on 08/07/2007 5:51:21 PM PDT by Springman (Why is ? coming up, when I use ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
When they start taxing you out of your own home..then people finally revolt. CA did it with Prop 13. Sooner or later the people will win.

The law approved by the voters was essentially a Prop 13 with a 1998 starting date. The voters approved it. The corrupt government overturned the voters.

19 posted on 08/07/2007 6:03:04 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth

government of the government, by the government, for the government

20 posted on 08/07/2007 6:09:20 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture (Duncan Hunter for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson