Posted on 08/05/2007 5:34:39 PM PDT by Lovebloggers
CALLER: I want a complete, impartial, and totally independent investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 . Im tired of this bogus garbage about terrorism. Ask Michael Meacher about how he feels about this bogus war on terrorism. Can you comment on that please?
HON. DR. RON PAUL: Well, that would be nice to have. Unfortunately, we dont have that in place. IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT. But you know, for top level policy theres not a whole lot of difference between the two policies so a real investigation isnt going to happen. But I think we have to keep pushing for it. And like you and others, we see the investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on.
(Excerpt) Read more at michellemalkin.com ...
================================
I would add, that Ron Paul remained a libertarian. As such, as older he gets as further he drifts from reality. More bizarre statements from him should be expected. Next, please!
http://brainster.blogspot.com/2007_01_14_archive.html#116930675215120892
Link to the mp3 of the radio show
Paul/Kucinich 08!
All the Pualistas are over on another FRED post.
But HEY sounds like a great KOOK TICKET, that Paul/Kucinich 08!
So what exactly is wrong with being a libertarian? (Note that that's with a little "l".)
Audio: Ron Paul shocked to find hes associated with TrutherismYou'd make Josef Goebbels blush.
From your quote:
“Does he not know what Alex Joness radio show is about? Does he think its some sort of local interest program? He makes regular appearances on it; isnt it about time someone clued the great man in?”
Next we will be hearing Debunked: Bill Clinton did not have sex with that woman!
Oh, but there are several websites that really want people like you around.
You mean there aren't any WMDs in Iraq?
But . . but . . but . .
What am I to make of all the threads on FreeRepublic which say there are, and FReepers who claim the Bush administration is either a) waiting for the proper time to spring it on the opposition for political gain, or b) keeping it under wraps so terrorists won't go looking for what wasn't found and disposed of?
Is it possible (not to mention desirable) to keep an open mind about both the veracity and finality of government reports on subjects with potentially earth-shaking consequences such as these? I think it is.
And one does not need to be a "truther" to be skeptical of the official government line. Their record is far from flawless.
This isn’t Michelle Malkin’s story. This is an update on his blog at the bottom which links to an mp3 recording of the radio show in which Paul made these comments.
We talked about due diligence in another thread. ;)
This isn’t Michelle Malkin’s story. This is an update on his blog at the bottom which links to an mp3 recording of the radio show in which Paul made these comments.
We talked about due diligence in another thread. ;)
All you can do is hurl insults. Making your insults more vicious and more absurd will not help L.Ron succeed. He is a laughingstock, and on FR, you are too.
You should understand that Paul is a lifelong devout Christian and all of his beliefs are in line with traditional Republicanism.
Casually throwing around the libertarian word and trying to equate it with the liberal one isn't going to have an impact on Paul, since Paul is pro-life, pro-border security, and pro-traditional values, which are at odds with the Libertarian Party itself.
IT WILL BE A LITTLE BIT BETTER NOW WITH THE DEMOCRATS NOW IN CHARGE OF OVERSIGHT.
Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 • |
|
|
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave |
Did you read where the quote came from in her blog?
of course you didn’t — you need talking points from Paul campaign headquarters to do that.
So TWO appearances is "regular? You can bet he knows the score now that Alex Jones (and a lot of Fred fans here on FR) lied about what he said that second appearance.
You mean there aren’t any WMDs in Iraq?
No, because Saddam moved them into Syria.
Obviously, that just proves that Ron Paul is a traitor who has been feeding info to Osama bin Laden.
Seriously, I would guess that Paul was trying to get at the concept of “loyal opposition”. I think he might have thought that the Democrats would be antagonistic to a Republican administration and more relevant information would be learned and released. Some people are so quick to scream “traitor” or “nutbag” that they just don’t stop to think.
I’ve even stated above why I think he’s wrong. It’s just that I don’t believe that having an opinion on foreign policy that differs with GWB makes one a traitor or a “nutcase”.
I also remember a time when conservatives said things like “I love my country, but I fear my government.” I guess now the “conservative” saying around here is “I believe the government completely when our guys have the presidency”.
We are discussing comments he made on a radio show. You keep ignoring that and lap up the denials from Paul like the puppy dog you are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.