Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/05/2007 3:07:08 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Sub-Driver

He is sooo right. We love TOM. Go Tom go!!


2 posted on 08/05/2007 3:09:51 PM PDT by Dutch Tulip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Kudos to Tank Tancredo!


3 posted on 08/05/2007 3:10:58 PM PDT by SolidWood (UN delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver; SittinYonder
Does anyone really give a damn what the State Department says or thinks? Anyone at all?
4 posted on 08/05/2007 3:11:35 PM PDT by NapkinUser ("The House will pass S1348 and the president will sign it into law. It's a done deal." -B. Chezwick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"Let me just say that it is absolutely outrageous and reprehensible for anyone to suggest attacks on holy sites -- whether they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish or those of any other religion,"...

Considering the muzzies bomb everyone's holy sites, including their OWN, I agree with Tom.

State Dept. is full of cr@p on this one.

You nuke US, we nuke YOU, only I'd start with Tehran, THEN Mecca....

6 posted on 08/05/2007 3:14:58 PM PDT by dirtbiker (I tried to see things from the liberal point-of-view, but I couldn't get my head up my a$$...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"My task as president of the United States is primarily to do one thing -- by the way, not to make sure everybody has health care or everybody's child is educated -- my task is to do one thing: to protect and defend this country.

Finally a republican says that we don't have a right to healthcare and the government is responsible for your life. Where is Giuliani and Romney on this? Oh I forgot, "MittCare" is in Massachusetts now.

7 posted on 08/05/2007 3:15:26 PM PDT by NapkinUser ("The House will pass S1348 and the president will sign it into law. It's a done deal." -B. Chezwick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Kennedy held the Soviets responsible for actions of the Cubans, whats the big deal?

Third: It shall be the policy of this nation to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union.

10 posted on 08/05/2007 3:19:51 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Muslim sites are more political and offensive (in the armory sense) than religioous.


13 posted on 08/05/2007 3:29:46 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

All responses should be on the table. Had Dhimmi Carter used Qom as a test site for the Neutron Bomb, we’d never have had to deal with Allan’s Nut Patrol ever again.


16 posted on 08/05/2007 3:36:31 PM PDT by sono (Where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence - M Gandhi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Right on TANC!~


17 posted on 08/05/2007 3:52:29 PM PDT by 383rr (Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither- GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

“..America should threaten to bomb Muslim holy sites in order to deter a nuclear attack on US soil.”

Hmm, finally someone coming up with the right idea. Took them long enough. And if threats don’t have the desired effect, action will have to be taken. Else, the US will be known as a babba ganoosh or hummus tiger.


20 posted on 08/05/2007 5:05:36 PM PDT by 353FMG (Take me seriously at your own peril.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Tancredo's remarks are irresponsible and inflammatory. He is making the mission of our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan more dangerous and difficult. He is actually endangering the lives of our soldiers with his reckless comments and empty threats.

STFU Tancredo.

21 posted on 08/05/2007 5:16:03 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
>>>>>>"My task as president of the United States is primarily to do one thing -- by the way, not to make sure everybody has health care or everybody's child is educated -- my task is to do one thing: to protect and defend this country.

The Founders would be proud of Tom Tancredo. So would Ronald Reagan.

26 posted on 08/05/2007 5:51:45 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
32 posted on 08/05/2007 10:25:07 PM PDT by DogByte6RER ("Loose lips sink ships")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
“Let me just say that it is absolutely outrageous and reprehensible for anyone to suggest attacks on holy sites — whether they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish or those of any other religion,” departmental spokesman Tom Casey said.

Actually Tom Casey it is absolutely outrageous and reprehensible for any member of the:

NONELECTED STATE DEPARTMENT!

To make any comment WHATSOEVER regarding the political comments of any US Elected Official.

To comment on the words of a person running for President or any elected office while they are running for office should properly result immediate and permanent firing of the State Department ASSHATS responsible for the Effluvium coming from your mouth “Spokesman”.

Fire the A$$Hats that allowed or in any way participated in making such comments by the State Department on the Political Position of an Elected Public Official running for the Presidency Now!

W

37 posted on 08/06/2007 3:12:52 AM PDT by WLR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

We’re with Mr. Tancredo. Casey is a compromiser on U.S. security interests.


40 posted on 08/06/2007 6:34:48 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"My task as president of the United States is primarily to do one thing -- by the way, not to make sure everybody has health care or everybody's child is educated -- my task is to do one thing: to protect and defend this country."

Say what you will about Tancredo otherwise, but on this point, he gets it.

41 posted on 08/06/2007 6:47:02 AM PDT by B Knotts (Anybody but Giuliani!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, Tancredo’s comments will certainly gain him some exposure. I’m not opposed to condoning these actions as real options...can’t say the same for 95% of the American public though.

I’m not ashamed to say that Tancredo is my favorite candidate of the bunch, followed by Paul and Hunter. Slick “safe” bureaucrats who regurgitate PC focus-group-generated platitudes, talking points, and slogans - for some reason, perhaps grounded in history - are a major turn off. All sugar to help to Marxism-lite go down.


43 posted on 08/06/2007 8:13:14 AM PDT by M203M4 (Vote conservatism in 2008 - vote to defend the US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"...prompting the State Department to describe it as "absolutely crazy."

=====================

It's so crazy it just might work!

44 posted on 08/06/2007 8:23:47 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countervalue


55 posted on 08/07/2007 5:12:34 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Bestowing kindness on the evil visits cruelty on the good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

The State Department on Friday reacted angrily to Tancredo’s initial comments.

“Let me just say that it is absolutely outrageous and reprehensible for anyone to suggest attacks on holy sites — whether they are Muslim, Christian, Jewish or those of any other religion,” departmental spokesman Tom Casey said.

Tancredo is a bull in a china shop, as this demonstrates once again.

That said, the State Department, like the CIA and FBI, are about as useful as tits on a bull.....


59 posted on 08/07/2007 10:57:18 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson