Seems like I have heard this idea before here on this site. Like on 9/12?
Dear CAIR,
The truth hurts, doesn’t it?
I don’t CARE what CAIR thinks about anything.
If thats how Hooper feels, Tancredo must be right.
Tancredo is exactly right. Any major attack on our soil - nuclear or otherwise - perpetrated by Islamists should be met with the annihilation of Mecca, Medina, and whatever other sites those cultist freaks consider “holy.”
"For the phenomenon of Islamofascism as a whole, this must be understood as a pathological frenzy. All such frenzies are unstable. The list of ways to destabilize fragile fanatical minds is long.
Is there a suitcase nuke already secretly buried in Mecca that will vaporize Islam's most sacred shrine if America suffers another 9/11? Who knows? Maybe.
Has an experimental biofuel made with pig fat been secretly added to the world's airline fuel supplies, spreading pig fat molecules in the atmosphere of the Middle East, so impregnating the lungs of Moslem fanatics that the doors of Islamic heaven are shut to them? Maybe. Could be."
By far the best way to stop an attack is to go after the terrorists where they have their havens, which is basically the Bush doctrine (although we haven't found a way to effectively get at them in the northwest of Pakistan).
If the Rats either through control of Congress or the Presidency withdraw our efforts to mostly within our own borders, then Tancredo is right in that it will just be a matter of time before a WMD attack here. Neither the Rats nor the Chamber of Commerce Republicans have the desire to control our borders or track dangerous foreigners in the country.
Okay, have I stirred things up a bit?
The only thing the Children of Ishmael understand is brute force. If it’s at all possible for them to “respect” anything, it’s that.
The only question is, does this nation have the testicular fortitude to actually DO that, should something terrible happen to us at the hands of the Mohammedans?
Honestly, I don’t think we do. The 5th Column will see to that.
One our greatest Crusaders against the Cult of Hate and Intolerance is Robert Spencer and CAIR has him in their sights. CAIR is currently trying to put pressure on colleges and universities to revoke his various invitations to speak.
Nobody in our country understands or speaks out against the muslims as much as Robert Spencer.
Imminent nuclear attack? Yawn.
If moos had nukes, they’d have blown their wad already.
Hmmmmmm perhaps Tancredo is right, it certainly got a reaction. Why the the Islamists be upset were he not right. They would simply say that it wouldn’t work.
It certainly would not make them back down and offer an olive branch.
Think back a couple thousand years- Rome was tired of a particular religious rabble rouser, and they handled it by torturing him to death in public. His followers scattered and continued to preach their messiah’s words, and eventually Rome officially converted to this new religion.
Nuking the K’abbah would be an event of Biblical proportions; one that would never ever be forgotten, and it would become the central point of focus for a billion people who were not polarized before the event.
Don’t forget, the holiest thing in the K’abbah is a piece of fused sand (from a meteor strike). It’s not very big. A 20 MT groundpounder would make a huge area of fused sand- tens of thousands of times bigger than the piece that’s there now. That’s big enough that every mosque in the world could have one- Trinitite on a wholesale level.
Alright folks . . . let’s get real here. Would we nuke the Vatican for the actions of a group of Marxist crazed Liberation Theology priests??? All this would do is piss off A-L-L Muslims, ( both the Islamofacists and Moderates ) , you’d be turning people who are currently our allies, ( those who have lived under Sharia law and hated it ) into our enemies. Think these things through just a L-I-T-T-L-E B-I-T ! ! !
The Hoopster has been busy this week. That’s S-CAIR-Y.
Tancredo would do better to threaten Riyadh, Tehran, Islamabad, Damascus, etc. with destruction in retaliation for a WMD attack in the USA. These are the people who are supporting the terrorists, & have the most to lose if it comes to that.
Also, by threatening Mecca, Tancredo as president, is effectively declaring war on islam, so why not outlaw islam as a satanic cult, & expel the muslims in our midst who are the prime source of terrorism in this country. This would do far more to block domestic terrorism than simply threatening Mecca, & be a huge setback for the caliphate & jihad - much like Spain (Andalusia) in 1491. And for good measure, we could expel the Palestinians from Gaza & the West Bank - Palestinian statehood problem solved. If we’re gonna PO the muzzies, might as well do it right.
A little common sense. What’s going on?
I’d go for a preemptive strike
I agree.
Maybe Tancredo lurks on FreeRepublic. ;^)
Actually you know, you wouldn’t even have to drop a explosive device, you just use another kind of bomb on their Holy Sites.
You go to Jimmy Dean, Zeigler, and any other ‘sausage’ company and tell them you need blood, hooves, snots, ears ect, and a big ol cargo plane and you drop it all, all over the places.
If they wish to defile America, you defile them right back.
And the sausage companies could get a tax break for their contribution.
Ham steaks a la Mecca.
And do it every day for several days.
They’d go stark raving crazy.