Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flavius

Tancredo is exactly right. Any major attack on our soil - nuclear or otherwise - perpetrated by Islamists should be met with the annihilation of Mecca, Medina, and whatever other sites those cultist freaks consider “holy.”


7 posted on 08/02/2007 6:36:55 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo (There are four types of homicide: felonious, accidental, justifiable, and praiseworthy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Mojo

Tancredo is completely wrong. The US isn’t going to nuke innocents, even if we take a nuclear hit.


48 posted on 08/02/2007 8:08:53 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("Lord, give me chastity and temperance, but not now." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

If we are attacked en masse by more islamic terrorists on our soil, I say put our biggest atomic bomb right down the throat of Mecca and then tell the Muslims of this world...pray for peace and beg big-time for forgiveness...and we will think about it before we unleash the next 16,999 atomic bombs on your miserable @sses!


50 posted on 08/02/2007 8:11:02 PM PDT by Stayfree (*************************Get your copy of The Fred Factor by David Gill at Capitol Hill Comedy.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
Tancredo is exactly right. Any major attack on our soil - nuclear or otherwise - perpetrated by Islamists should be met with the annihilation of Mecca, Medina, and whatever other sites those cultist freaks consider “holy.”

I disagree greatly. That action would leave the infrastructure of the countries that harbor the terrorist intact. They would then redouble their efforts to harm us and using the bombing of holy sites as a central plank in their rage. The way to hurt the bad guys is to use decapitating strikes against the governments and the infrastructure of the nation or nations. Take out the petroleum distribution systems, electricity, and seaports. That nation state would then collapse. The death toll from the strikes would be fairly small. The death toll as the infrastructure collapses would be horrific. Starvation, and disease would kill millions.

Oddly enough a country such as Afghanistan would fare well. Their farming is not highly mechanized and dependent of petroleum and is irrigated from valley streams. A country such as Iran would be devastated due to its dependence on fuel and electricity to farm and bring food into the central cities, Tehran in particular.

51 posted on 08/02/2007 8:11:03 PM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo
..whatever other sites those cultist freaks consider “holy".

That may prove to be quite a task. Just about every city in the middle east is prefaced with the word "HOLY", however I for one am willing to give it try!!

72 posted on 08/02/2007 9:46:01 PM PDT by PISANO (There is NO security & there can be none as long as there are suicide bombers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

“Any major attack on our soil - nuclear or otherwise - perpetrated by Islamists should be met with the annihilation of Mecca, Medina, and whatever other sites those cultist freaks consider “holy.””

Well if you’re doing them in order, the third most holy city in Islam is Jerusalem. Still as enthusiastic?


84 posted on 08/03/2007 12:49:55 PM PDT by UKTory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Mojo

ITA. I don’t think the USA will do it though.


133 posted on 08/04/2007 10:33:19 PM PDT by Twink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson