Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamma says No Nukes under any circumstances
http://www.pr-inside.com/print193277.htm ^

Posted on 08/02/2007 11:05:56 AM PDT by ulm1

WASHINGTON (AP) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama said Thursday he would not use nuclear weapons «in any circumstance. «I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,» Obama said, with a pause, «involving civilians.» Then he quickly added, «Let me scratch that. There's been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That's not on the table.

(Excerpt) Read more at pr-inside.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: nationalinsecurity; nonukes; obama; obama2008; thenuclearquestion; unfit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2007 11:05:58 AM PDT by ulm1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Where was Obama-Jama when he stepped on his crank on this issue?


2 posted on 08/02/2007 11:07:29 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

This guy shouldn’t be in charge of a outhouse.


3 posted on 08/02/2007 11:07:37 AM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON ON Obama’s Pakistan Invasion: “Apart from the notion that it would be as hard to distinguish civilians in a Waziristan from terrorists as it is in Iraq, which the senator has written off, other questions arise. As a US Senator why not now introduce an October 11, 2002-type resolution, authorizing such an invasion? Or why hasn’t he in the past? Obama has criticized Sen. Clinton for her approval of that Iraqi authorization, but the sort of action he is envisioning involves crossing into a nuclear Islamic country, one bullet away from an Islamic republic, and surely should be a question for Congressional approval.”


4 posted on 08/02/2007 11:09:14 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

He’s a coward.

Under the RIGHT circumstances they will, may but WILL be used against us and we against them.


5 posted on 08/02/2007 11:09:18 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1
«I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,»

Hillary is going to shove that statement up his butt. When she does it is going to really irritate the left over at the DNC underground and the kooks at Kos.

6 posted on 08/02/2007 11:09:21 AM PDT by cpdiii (Pharmacist, Pilot, Geologist, Oil Field Trash and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

Yes he should.


7 posted on 08/02/2007 11:09:23 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

How in the world do people like this get nominated to represent the most powerful nation on earth?
Let’s see... he’s clean, Edwards has nice hair and Hillary wears a pantsuit.


8 posted on 08/02/2007 11:12:05 AM PDT by BigFinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Nah, nah, nah, nah.....nah, nah, nah, nah...hey, hey, hey...good-bye.


9 posted on 08/02/2007 11:12:18 AM PDT by Pete (Run, Vaclav, run!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Obama wouldn’t even use nuclear weapons if the troops he uses to invade Pakistan are nuked?


10 posted on 08/02/2007 11:12:37 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

What nimcumpoopery.
Buffoonery.
Imbecility.
Jack@$$ery.
Nitwittery.

Like I posted yesterday, I think this guy was propped up by hillary supporters to make her look more preseidential by comparison.


11 posted on 08/02/2007 11:14:43 AM PDT by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

“Hey Islamo-Terrorists, go ahead and nuke one of our cities, we’re too civilized to retaliate in kind”

President Obama


12 posted on 08/02/2007 11:15:03 AM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

This kid needs to go back to playing in the sandbox.


13 posted on 08/02/2007 11:15:15 AM PDT by Obadiah (Nothing says, "Get off my lawn" like the inscription of a claymore - THIS SIDE TOWARDS THE ENEMY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

He’s fumbled the nuclear football then.

He’s offered any nation that launches a nuclear strike on the US a “free shot”. No nuclear response.

And military invasion would prove unpopular.

Would he work to disarm our nuclear arsenal?

It may be with great reservation that a President would want to go to war, but EVERY President should be prepared as Commander-in-Chief to GO to war. It comes with the office.


14 posted on 08/02/2007 11:16:52 AM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance.

Yep. His political handlers must be shaking their heads at this idiotic remark.

15 posted on 08/02/2007 11:17:20 AM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ulm1

Obama has even more of a run-on mouth than Biden does.


16 posted on 08/02/2007 11:17:42 AM PDT by Parmenio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
Good Cop - Bad Cop. Makes Hillary seem centrist by “comparison”.
17 posted on 08/02/2007 11:18:10 AM PDT by weegee (NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

Exactly...this guy should be flushed down history’s toilet as the unqualified POS he is...


18 posted on 08/02/2007 11:18:44 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ulm1
If we got attacked by Al Qaeda or China, Barack's response would be to fiddle the violin while America burned.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

19 posted on 08/02/2007 11:20:39 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
He's a fool. Let's put it this way, Big-Eared 'bama: if JFK told the Kremlin that he'd never use nukes under any circumstance, do you think they would have been more or less likely to launch against us?

There's a reason M.A.D. (Mutually Assured Destruction) worked... both sides knew the punishment for launching.

20 posted on 08/02/2007 11:20:46 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson