The Kerry team tried to suppress his book too:
A copy will cost you $28-393 right now. They had risen consistently over $100 during the 2004 election.
Posted on 08/01/2007 11:30:59 AM PDT by AndrewWalden
A PDF copy of Hillary Rodham’s senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning. it is titled:
“There is only one fight …” an analysis of the Alinsky Model
Although I have no ‘loving wife’ to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.
We have not had a chance to review and will do so today. Regardless, we wanted to post this as soon as possible to share with everyone. Hillary is running for President and it is important to know what she really believes. This document was hidden from public view during her husband’s presidency -= an apparent favor to the Clintons fromt he President of the university - and interest in it fell when the Clintons left office. Now with Hillary a top Democratic candidate for President the importance of this document has frothed to the surface again....
(Excerpt) Read more at gopublius.com ...
Kudos to you for the rapid post of HRC’s long hidden thesis.
Downloaded and copies wing to those that need to read it.
Thanks again for help in ripping away the veil.
Well, it sure would have made things easier if you had posted a DIRECT downloadable URL to obtain it.
Here it is, in pdf format:
http://www.gopublius.com/HillaryClintonThesis.pdf
(Note: this is not a clickable hotlink. You must copy and then paste in your browser, per the request of the website).
Get it while you can.
- John
Was this faxed from a Kinkos?
Actually, after reading it, I don’t think it will hurt her, but rather help her. I do find her comparison of Alinsky to Debs, Walt Whitman, and MLK to be instructive.
MS Word wasn't invented yet.
Maybe you mean that the difference is that Alinsky-style "change" (espoused by Hillary) involves using the irresistable power of government to force people to behave in a "government-approved" manner. That 's both radical and totalitarian.
The Kerry team tried to suppress his book too:
A copy will cost you $28-393 right now. They had risen consistently over $100 during the 2004 election.
“’What does the radical want? He wants a world in which the worth of the individual is recognized....A world based on the morality of mankind...The radical believes that all peoples should have a high standard of food, housing and health. The radical places human rights far above property rights. He is fro free, universal public education and recognizes this as fundamental to the democratic way of life... Democracy to him is working from the bottom up....the Radical believes completely in real quality of opportunity for all peoples regardless of race color or creed.’ - (quote from Saul Alinsky)
Much of what Alinsky professes does not sound ‘radical’. his are the words used in schools and churches, by our parents and their friends, by our peers. The difference is that Alinsky really believes in them and recognizes the necessity of changing the present structure of our lives in order to realize them.”
Regarding the issues you raise:
“Worth of the individual” According to which standard?
“Morality of mankind” Define moral. Define moral as it exists in various cultures.
“High standard of food, housing and health” Once again, compared to which concept of normal.
...
“Real equality of opportunity” Who decides this? Who enforces this? Globally?
“Changing the present structure of our lives” I used to think that was necessary and possible. Now, I don’t want to live as most North Koreans or Danes or Kenyans or French. The structure of a human life takes, if not infinite, then 1000s of variations. The wonder is in what is possible, not probable.
While I recognize the conceptual beauty of these thoughts, the reality of life itself is that even if we dared consider that some of these thoughts could be implemented, someone or someones have to decide what the standards are. THAT is not a power I willingly give to anyone but me.
bookmark for later
Thanks——finally, eh?
Hopefully, this thesis coming out party, coupled with the run for the presidency will educate millions of Americans of just how the “liberals” have hoodwinked them over the years.
It’s really quite extraordinary and very under-reported.
ping
Hell's Bells....I was a card carrying ACLU member......My, how times change when you have responsibilities and bills to pay............
The bottom line is that Mr. Foster was murdered in a professional hit in a specific DC office (outside the WH) to which he was lured and ambushed. His body was then taken by car to its pre-designed dumping spot at Fort Marcy Park. In fact, his body arrived at FMP before before his car did (according to several eyewitnesses), which completely rules out the "suicide-in-the-park" fabrication.
Although HRC was conveniently out of town at the time of the crime, events following the crime show conclusively that she wasn't surprised at what had happened and she went into immediate cover-up mode. In other words, she was a central figure in a murder conspiracy.
GOPublius bandwith now exceeded.
BTW, her participation in a murder conspiracy is not at all inconsistent with her marxist upbringing.
bump
Bump for later, bandwidth exceeded at the site.
LOL
I just can't escape a feeling that we're being hornswaggled here; and, that the poster was given a sanitized version of a thesis that might have contained much more Marxist and America -damning opinion than the current PDF.
Does anyone else note a similarity between billing records mysteriously appearing in a vacant room (just after expiration of statute of limitations) and a ... PDF copy of Hillary Rodham’s senior thesis at Wellesley arrived in our inbox this morning ?
I have not read the entire doc yet, but so far, the left-owned media can unapologetically rationalize about all of it.
What I would like to see is some FBI forensics experts authenticate the "original" document; and, Hillary's eyes when she claims it's the original.
One way to tell if it's been modified... and if it was Hillary and her operatives that clandestinely released the bogus doc...
... then, Hillary will pretend to be outraged at the release of the doc, and will attack the scoundrels that put it on the net..
However, if PDF represents the original unedited thesis, then she would would take a contrite and defensive tone.
I remain suspicious of the PDF's total authenticity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.