Skip to comments.
An Administration LOST at Sea
American Spectator ^
| 31 july 07
| Doug Bandow
Posted on 07/31/2007 2:59:11 AM PDT by rellimpank
Once the scourge of goo-goo internationalism, the Bush administration is now desperate to appease the United Nations crowd, Europeans, and "transies," as the transnational progressives, or NGO gaggle, is called. The president's latest concession is pushing the Law of the Sea Treaty, appropriately known as LOST.
Needless to say, all of the wrong people are excited at the prospect of American ratification of LOST, after a more than three decade long struggle. Those who oppose the inevitable LOST victory will show themselves to be "part of an extreme out-of-touch minority," said one happy treaty advocate.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; govwatch; lost; unclos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"The Law of the Sea Treaty also would give the UN power to tax American citizens and businesses...LOST also would establish an international court system to enforce its provisions and rulings."Where is FR's tiny gaggle of free traitors to spin this one? They're usually here by now, trying to deny, explain and alibi LOST.
41
posted on
07/31/2007 11:22:02 AM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Ben Ficklin
"The GOP doesn't need to worry about this yet."And what about you, Ben. Are you for or against LOST (i.e., are you for or against the national sovereignty of the United States)?
42
posted on
07/31/2007 11:26:38 AM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: ovrtaxt
Globalism in the name of free markets. GOSH WHERE HAVE WE HEARD THAT BEFORE???? HHHMMMMM? bttt!
43
posted on
07/31/2007 12:01:34 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: Politicalmom
44
posted on
07/31/2007 12:01:52 PM PDT
by
nicmarlo
To: nicmarlo
45
posted on
07/31/2007 12:57:12 PM PDT
by
Guenevere
(Duncan Hunter for President 2008!!!)
To: Recon Dad
And Bushbots wonder why Bush’s popularity numbers are down?
Duh?
46
posted on
07/31/2007 1:36:14 PM PDT
by
OldArmy52
(Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
To: indylindy
def. Hate speech: You don’t agree with my opinion.
def. Non-hate speech: I don’t agree with your opinion.
Soon to be codified into Federal Law, come 2008 and Hillery.
47
posted on
07/31/2007 1:38:37 PM PDT
by
OldArmy52
(Bush's Legacy: 100 million new Dem voters in next 20 yrs via the 2007 Amnesty Act.)
To: Czar
Touche’ They are dangerous, mine are stupid.
48
posted on
07/31/2007 2:21:17 PM PDT
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: Phatboy
I think it would be worth the call. This thing has more bad ramifications for us. We basically give up all rights to ocean mining to the UN.
49
posted on
07/31/2007 2:27:06 PM PDT
by
Recon Dad
(Marine Spec Ops Dad)
To: Recon Dad
We basically give up all rights to ocean mining to the UN. We gave up all rights to space mining in 1967. Ocean mining, that is, oil and gas, will continue.
50
posted on
07/31/2007 2:29:41 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: Recon Dad
Here, one is dumb as a box of rocks but has a sharp staff that keeps her out of trouble; the other one is very sharp and a left wing true believer. Together, they have pretty much made a mess of anything and everything they’ve touched. Neither can be salvaged.
51
posted on
07/31/2007 2:35:30 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Recon Dad
I don’t know whose behind it, but “crap” perfectly defines it.
The whole world is going to hell around us and our leaders are scared to death that we will be left out.
52
posted on
07/31/2007 2:40:28 PM PDT
by
F.J. Mitchell
(All our Washington Comedians.. politicians ? whatever!,say to Mexico: " Take my country....Please.")
To: Czar; Greg F
On one hand, the maycouldamites say that if the senate ratifies, it may-could-might destroy the nation.
On the other hand, there are no ifs, ands, or buts about it, the arctic nations(US excluded) are jockying around staking claims.
Some say there could be some conflicts. More likely, the treaty will provide a framework for the signatories to co-operate and carve up the arctic.
Meanwhile, events at the recent Lobster Summit have caused some of the senators to get frantic.
To: Politicalmom
My own Senator Lugar is the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and has been plugging this treacherous treaty forever.
In fact, he has now devoted an entire webpage of editorials from the Main Stream Media that agree that the LOST is a good thing.
So it must be a good thing. After all, Senator Lucifer Lugar is a "moderate" Republican.
54
posted on
07/31/2007 6:12:41 PM PDT
by
HoosierHawk
(If I need to add a sarcasm tag, maybe you don't belong on this forum.)
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
We’re going to need Ron Paul as President to undo Bush’s Globalist agenda damage. Our nation can do better than the lesser of two evils voting.
55
posted on
08/01/2007 4:07:18 AM PDT
by
cva66snipe
(Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
To: Ben Ficklin
I will be happy to repeat the question you are dodging:
"Are you for or against LOST (i.e., are you for or against the national sovereignty of the United States)?"Loyal American conservatives have no trouble at all answering this question.
What about you, Ben?
56
posted on
08/01/2007 1:32:21 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
To: Czar
All you maycouldamites say that we have the most potent Navy and don't need to sign the treat.
Well now is the time. You need to send the Navy into the artic. NOW.
Russia is claiming our sea floor. Canada has said that they will begin patrolling Horn Island, which Bush says is in international waters.
Now is the time. Send them in!
To: Ben Ficklin
I think we have our answer.
You are not a loyal American conservative.
But then we already knew that.
58
posted on
08/01/2007 3:29:58 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: Ben Ficklin
Oh my. Cursing now, are we.
Must have struck a nerve.
Don't despair, Ben, you can always go back to that party-above-principle, illegal alien pandering, GOP Big Tent you so revere. Going to be lonely for you now, though, what with the conservative base having vacated the place and all. Still, you can still hobnob with your friends, the RINOs and "moderates". Birds of a feather and all that...
60
posted on
08/01/2007 3:46:16 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson