Proposed North American Union Flag

July 25, 2007 | processing please hold

[processing please hold]

Observe.

[1rudeboy]

It is interesting how, whenever I ask you a specific question on any number of specific topics, you think that spamming the thread with the same material over and over again constitutes an answer. And that you can't even be bothered to highlight a section or two that you think are relevant to the question at hand.

Let's take a thread from yesterday, for example (don't know if you saw it or not):
Canada, U.S., Mexico sign trilateral energy accord.
One person see this as an agreement by the United States with two countries that sell it electricity. The other sees it as the SPP implementing the NAU. When the former asks the latter for some proof, the latter spams him with a link to the SPP website. That's silly.

[yorkie]

[nicmarlo]

I just found that site earlier today. Do you know anything about who it is that is working on it? their backgrounds, political affiliations, and such?

[oneamericanvoice]

The post wasn’t referring to the proposed flag, but to a bumper sticker against the Confederate flag.

Wonder where they’d like to deport us to?

[aomagrat]

[oneamericanvoice]

Thanks. I missed it. You got it off a Canadian site...hahaha

[ravingnutter]

It's not worth arguing with them...I even followed their links once they finally posted them on that one thread and they apparently don't even read their own links before they post them. Last I heard from them was "Don't post to me again", LOL!

This time they can't find the link where they got the flag that they posted on photobucket. Why couldn't they just post it from the original link if they are as smart as they say they are to be able to "connect the dots"? Let them have their silly conspiracies. With World Weekly News closing down, we have to have some levity here, LOL!

[Gone_Postal]

First NAVY JACK

[processing please hold]

Thanks for the link. I've bookmarked the site.

It does seem like they are ahead of us on this.

I hope the planned protest next month in Canada is as overwhelming success.

[processing please hold]

Visionaries, aren’t they. Damn them all.

[Squantos]

The person that “officially” raises that flag within rifle range is just a victim of their own sedition IMO.........

[processing please hold]

It’s not a laughing matter. Canada has just as much to lose as we do- sovereignty.

[Ex-RaptureMonkey]

What is your source for that tri-star flag? I’ve never seen it before.

[1rudeboy]

Your’re in for some trouble in the future. We have some “conservatives” here bookmarking lefty websites for future use.

[Gone_Postal]

There have been a few where instances where the traditional First Navy Jack has been used in lieu of the Union Jack:

1. In 1975, the Secretary of the Navy directed that the First Navy Jack be flown in 1975 and 1976 in lieu of the Union Jack during the United States Bicentennial Year as a colorful and historic reminder of the nation's and the Navy's origin.

2. In August 1977 (the date is sometimes mistakenly (?) given as 1980 or even 1981), the Secretary of the Navy specified that the ship with the longest total period of active service display the First Navy Jack until decommissioned or transferred to inactive service, at which time the flag shall be passed to the next ship in line with appropriate honors. Here are ships that have had this honor:

The USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) received the distinction from the Independence November 20, 1998. The Kitty Hawk was commissioned April 29, 1961 and still proudly displays the flag.

[wtc911]

From the Declaration of Quebec City, signed by GWB in April 2001...

"We recognize the cultural and economic contributions made by migrants to receiving societies as well as to their communities of origin. We are committed to ensuring dignified, humane treatment with appropriate legal protections, defense of human rights, and safe and healthy labor conditions for migrants. We will strengthen mechanisms for hemispheric cooperation to address the legitimate needs of migrants and take effective measures against trafficking in human beings."

Is there any wonder that he led the charge for amnesty?

and...

"We welcome and value the contributions of civil society, including business and labor organizations, to our Plan of Action. We affirm that openness and transparency are vital to building public awareness and legitimacy for our undertakings. We call upon all citizens of the Americas to contribute to the Summit process."

Transparency? The people are encouraged to participate? Has there ever been a less transparent, more secretive government initiative than the SPP, which evolved from this?

[processing please hold]

I got it off a Canadian site. I was searching for Pastors comments before either the trilateral commission or the SPP where he was pushing the Amero, the way the EU now uses the Euro.(spel?)

[1rudeboy]

I remember one occasion where a FReeper posted a portion of the (infamous) Pastor/CFR paper that he found on a website somewhere, and then later in the thread posted a link to the paper again thinking that he found additional evidence. One would have thought that he bothered to read it the first time.

[Kimberly GG]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1871523/posts

Interesting thread just started pertaining to the NAU. Apparently a protester (someone who may be a Ron Paul supporter) just this morning, asked Fred Thompson about his CFR membership and it’s involvement with the creating of a NAU. He laughed and said he “didn’t know they were doing that”. Needless to say she was, not so gently, escorted out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvMWGNX7HlI

Far too important an issue to be clueless, IMO.

[processing please hold]

April 2001-pre 9-11 and still when it happened nothing has interfered with his plans until the shamnesty bill was defeated-this time.

Thanks for posting his remarks.