Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Elders' Protocols-Jimmy Carter, Ted Turner, Kofi Annan, and Nelson Mandela team up
FrontPageMagazine.com ^ | July 23, 2007 | Joseph Klein

Posted on 07/23/2007 7:43:34 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2007 7:43:42 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The only one missing is “Bob Barker”.


2 posted on 07/23/2007 7:44:25 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I have to keep reminding myself that this is not a list of unindicted war criminals. This is, however, a group of dispicable men.


3 posted on 07/23/2007 7:47:55 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Progressives like to keep doing the things that didn't work in the past.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

A group of international scolds, busybodies and useful idiots. It would be funny if they weren’t so pathetic.


4 posted on 07/23/2007 7:49:49 AM PDT by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russ

‘’Protocols of the Elders of Stupid’’


5 posted on 07/23/2007 7:54:42 AM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Double Standard Watch: Carter’s selective sensitivity
Posted by Alan Dershowitz | Comments: 20
 
http://blogcentral.jpost.com/index.php?cat_id=7&blog_id=59&blog_post_id=1339

When Jimmy Carter used the word “Apartheid” in the title of his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, he knew it would deeply offend many Israelis, Jews and other supporters of Israel’s efforts to make peace with its Arab neighbors.  Yet he deliberately chose that deeply offensive word precisely in order to provoke. As Jeffrey Goldberg of The Washington Post said, it was a case of “bait and switch,” since in the text of the book, the word Apartheid appears only three times and Carter goes out of his way to explain that what he believe Israel is doing “is unlike in South Africa – not racism….”

Carter was cautioned by friends not to use the inaccurate and provocative word Apartheid, but he insisted on putting it in his title, knowing full well how deeply offensive it would be to so many.

Contrast Carter’s insensitivity toward his Jewish readers with his extraordinary oversensitivity toward Muslim readers of Salman Rushdie’s controversial book The Satanic Verses. When Rushdie was sentenced to death in absentia by the Ayatollah Khomeini, and when Khomeini offered “Paradise” to anyone who would murder Rushdie, Carter did not leap to the defense of the threatened author.

Instead, he condemned him for his “direct insult to the millions of Muslims whose sacred beliefs have been violated and are suffering in restrained silence…” To be sure, Carter recited the obligatory defense of freedom of speech (“while Rushdie’s First Amendment freedoms are important …”), and the obligatory criticism of Khomeini (“it is our duty to condemn the threat of murder….”), it is clear that his true sympathies lie with the offended Muslims. This is what he wrote in his article entitled “Rushdie’s Book Is An Insult:”

“This is the kind of intercultural wound that is difficult to heal. Western leaders should make it clear that in protecting Rushdie’s life and civil rights, there is no endorsement of an insult to the sacred beliefs of our Moslem friends.

We must remember that Iranian and other fundamentalists are not the only Moslems involved. Around the world there are millions of others who are waiting for a thoughtful and constructive response to their concerns.”

Carter was relatively silent when millions of Muslims were on a rampage against the Danish cartoons depicting Mohammed (some positively, others negatively). 

His sensitivity seems limited to Muslims and Christians. This is what he said about the film “The Last Temptation of Christ”:

"…the sacreligious scenes were still distressing to me and many others who share my faith. There is little doubt that the movie producers and Scorsese, a professed Christian, anticipated adverse public reactions and capitalized on them."

Yet Carter fully “anticipated” and “capitalized” on the deliberately offensive title of his best-selling book.  Nor do I recall any condemnation by him of Mel Gibson’s film, “The Passion of the Christ”, that was deeply offensive to many Jews. 

Jimmy Carter’s sensitivities seem to have a gaping hole when it comes to Jews. There is a term for that.

6 posted on 07/23/2007 7:56:15 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
The only one missing is “Bob Barker”.

Bob isn't qualified - he's not an anti-Semite.

7 posted on 07/23/2007 7:58:21 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows ("You can't strengthen a zero, it will always equal zero." --Avigdor Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Kind of like Appalachia mob meeting with depends.


8 posted on 07/23/2007 8:00:44 AM PDT by Steamburg (If we don't want our nation bad enough to protect it, it won't be ours long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Russ
Socialists all... with communist and antisemitic undertones.
9 posted on 07/23/2007 8:03:54 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel. or WOT [War on Terror]

----------------------------

See post 6

10 posted on 07/23/2007 8:04:20 AM PDT by SJackson (isolationism never was, never will be acceptable response to[expansionist] tyrannical governments)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

All in search of the next Yassir Arafat to lionize.


11 posted on 07/23/2007 8:05:25 AM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
‘’Protocols of the Elders of Stupid’’

Hey, Carter isn’t stupid. Unlike everyone else, he has the sense to know that if we just embrace Bin Laden, Hamas, Chavez, Castro, Taliban, Amadamnutjob, et al, with warm kisses and lots of money, the world will see war no more.

And butterflies and fairies will flutter about dispensing rainbow candy to all the little children...

The only thing stopping this scenario and peace on a global scale is not murderers, despots, and tyrants, its the JOOOOOOOOOS...

12 posted on 07/23/2007 8:11:50 AM PDT by picard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All

If anyone in that group has an intelligent thought, it will die alone.


13 posted on 07/23/2007 8:29:35 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

“They call themselves the ‘Elders’” . . .

Have you ever seen a better example of such total, nauseating vanity in your entire life?


14 posted on 07/23/2007 8:43:01 AM PDT by rightazrain ("Once we have a war there is only one thing to do. It must be won. " -- Ernest Hemingway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Oh, there are many other candidates for a group like this. Noam Chomsky, Helen Thomas, Walter Cronkite come to mind. All peas in a pod.


15 posted on 07/23/2007 8:43:44 AM PDT by Emile (Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. --Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightazrain

They’re elders in the same way my senile old uncle is. I wouldn’t take a thing they say seriously. One other thing — like the uncle, these elderly fools ought to all be in an assisted living facility, heavily sedated and supervised around the clock, so they couldn’t do themselves any further harm.


16 posted on 07/23/2007 8:49:37 AM PDT by Emile (Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. --Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

.


17 posted on 07/23/2007 8:53:43 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Oh brother! It’ll be a Meeting of the Mindless.


18 posted on 07/23/2007 8:55:35 AM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket I've got your elders right here.
19 posted on 07/23/2007 9:08:06 AM PDT by rfp1234 (Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Reminds me of UNIDROIT. It is the left over part of the League of Nations which is contracted out to write Treaties and Conventions which multiple nations sign.

These “elders” are nothing more than a psuedo security counsel with only socialists.

Each day Jimmy Carter demonstrates how the old media was able to manipulate his PR image in the 1970’s. If Ford vs Carter were be held today, Jimmy Carter would have lost in a landslide after the new media exposed him.


20 posted on 07/23/2007 9:11:16 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson