1 posted on
07/21/2007 9:05:40 PM PDT by
pctech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: pctech
You should never argue with an idiot. They just pull you down to their level and beat you with experience.
I hope this helps.
;-)
2 posted on
07/21/2007 9:08:30 PM PDT by
Grizzled Bear
("Does not play well with others.")
To: pctech
3 posted on
07/21/2007 9:08:42 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: pctech
The people want their government's resources to fund universal health care and to repair livesThe government doesn't have ANY resources except those wrested from its subjects. If people won't pay for their own healthcare, why should we trust them to choose the best people to buy them healthcare on their behalf?
4 posted on
07/21/2007 9:09:17 PM PDT by
coloradan
(Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
To: pctech
Don’t waste your time.
The short answer is this: The GOP went back on all its promises. The Dems won the congress on certain promises, and has already gone back on them.
Therefore, just about everybody hates the Congress.
5 posted on
07/21/2007 9:09:45 PM PDT by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: pctech
6 posted on
07/21/2007 9:10:55 PM PDT by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: pctech
If this is a true Chicago sports website then the only answer is a Louisville Slugger to the back of the head. It’s the Chicago Way!
7 posted on
07/21/2007 9:11:23 PM PDT by
REDWOOD99
To: pctech
YOU KNOW that:
Clinton said there was weapons of mass destruction
The UN said ...
Congress said ...
All of the intelligence agencies said ...
France said ...
Russia said ...
Hussein said ...
So, where did Bush lie?
Besides, lying isn’t an impeachable offence, otherwise ALL polititians would be impeached.
8 posted on
07/21/2007 9:16:07 PM PDT by
irishtenor
(There is no "I" in team, but there are two in IDIOT.)
To: pctech
Easy response to the moonbat... “WTF does this diatribe have to do with sports ?”
9 posted on
07/21/2007 9:16:46 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: pctech
Do they discuss sports on this sports website? ;^)
To: pctech
Bush’s fault....Next topic.
To: pctech
He is wrong on so many fundamental levels, that it is nearly incomprehensible that he would ever understand any argument you make.
13 posted on
07/21/2007 9:22:44 PM PDT by
NonLinear
(There is something unknown within Washington. It's called leadership.)
To: pctech
First of all, lets separate the House from Senate bodies. The Democrats hold a decisive majority to act and pass on legislation reflecting the will of the American public as expressed by last Novembers voting. On the Senate side, the gains gave the Democrats a majority, but one that does not have (as does the House) the force to carry out the will expressed by the electorate. In short, moving legislation coming from the House, faces an uphill battle, as the reality to pass legislation with simple majorities and beat back a Bush veto with the necessary 67 votes required, well, that hasnt happened, and most likely, wont happen, given the entrenched attitude about protecting Bush.The answer to your question is found in his opening presumption.
16 posted on
07/21/2007 9:24:32 PM PDT by
uptoolate
(How can a Holy, Righteous, and Just God NOT kill me for what I said, thought and did yesterday)
To: pctech
I presume you’re familiar with the term “idiot savant.” I wouldn’t personally waste my time arguing with the clown.
17 posted on
07/21/2007 9:25:22 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
To: pctech
time show him the invisible tin-foil hat he’s wearin
19 posted on
07/21/2007 9:28:39 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(Don't buy a putter until you have had a chance to throw it.)
To: pctech
Don’t bother.Nothing short of a lobotomy will clear this clown’s mind.
21 posted on
07/21/2007 9:32:06 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
To: pctech
Just reply, "Karl is that you?
![](http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:2xCDDqpQZdmUlM:http://www.wesleyan.edu/css/readings/Barber/marx.gif)
23 posted on
07/21/2007 9:35:11 PM PDT by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: pctech
Sounds like the person has a mind like a steel trap. No matter what you have to say in reply, it will not mean a thing and will fall on deaf ears. There are those who have ears and do not hear and have eyes and do not see.
Why even bother to waste your time to answer someone who will never be affected by your answer. Use your time and energy for something more constructive. Pray for the person and let it go at that.
24 posted on
07/21/2007 9:36:48 PM PDT by
tryon1ja
To: pctech
FWIW I wouldn’t bother responding to the idiot. He’s obviously engulfed in Liberal sewage with no way out, and you cannot help him. Pathetic.
25 posted on
07/21/2007 9:37:22 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: pctech
Reply: After reading your response, it is clear that your hatred for Bush and your ignorance of facts severely deminishes your ability to think logically. Rather than trying to educate you, I'll pray for you. I pray that somewhere in the near future, you set aside your hatred and reduce your ignorance by doing unbiased research and fact finding.
Once you have done that, we'll be able to communicate from a common base. Until then, I'm afraid further discussion with you would be a waste of both our time.God Bless...
26 posted on
07/21/2007 9:51:48 PM PDT by
Go Gordon
(The short fortune teller who escaped from prison was a small medium at large.)
To: pctech
I suspect that a reply would be a total waste of your time and that the only easy entry into its head would be with a .357 bullet. Despite the advice, if you are tempted to reply, you might focus on its claims to speak for “the people”. In my experience, “the people” usually consists of the Lib and its nearby friends, not any normal people that anyone might know.
27 posted on
07/21/2007 9:57:49 PM PDT by
Postman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson