Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Failure to Inform: CHL-holders taking a big risk on Ohio roadways
Buckeye Firearms Association (Ohio) ^ | 7/16/07 | Chad D. Baus

Posted on 07/18/2007 9:28:06 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim

There are mounds of evidence that most members of the pro-gun community care deeply about the rule of law. We spend lots of money to ensure we are in compliance with the law. We spend lots of time discussing the law in discussion forums, and even more time and money trying to improve laws in our state capitols. It is never pleasant when we have to air dirty laundry, or have it aired for us in an instance where a good guy does bad.

But after having had two unfortunate opportunities to discuss Ohio's concealed handgun license (CHL) law with law enforcement officers during traffic stops in the past six months, I am convinced it is time to air some dirty laundry.

I call my experiences "unfortunate" not because of the nature of the stops (one resulted in a warning for not using a turn signal at 1:00 a.m. on a deserted Oregon, OH street, the second earned me a citation for exceeding the speed limit on a rural Fulton County road while checking for a vibration on a vehicle at my car dealership).

No, I say my experiences were unfortunate because, in both cases, at the conclusion of the stops the officers involved thanked me for promptly informing them that I was a CHL-holder and that I was carrying, and informed me that most people do not comply with the legal requirement in Ohio to inform an officer that they are legally carrying!!

When the City of Oregon officer finished giving me the verbal warning regarding the turn signal (really I think she was trying to make sure I wasn't driving home from a late night at some bar), she offered her thanks to me for actually complying with the requirement to inform, I found it odd.

I had to ask: "Are you thanking me because it's an uncommon occurrence?"

Her reply: "I stop probably one [CHL-holder] a week coming through on this road, and you are the first person to do so."

"This isn't people who are licensed, but aren't carrying, right? You're saying they were armed at the time?"

"Yes."

I was incredulous, and, to be honest, a bit skeptical. How could so many CHL-holders be that ignorant about their obligations at traffic stops?

I thought about writing on the incident at the time, but decided that one officer's anecdotal commentary wasn't enough to go on. But then came the Ohio State Highway Patrol officer who met me on that county road recently. Once again, at the conclusion of the stop, the officer thanked me for complying with the notification law, saying "most people don't do that."

"I'm an NRA-certified instructor, I've been teaching these classes since the law passed. This is the second time I've been told that," I replied. "It better not have been any of my students - we spend a lot of time on this and they know they could have their license suspended! Do you have any idea where these people being trained?"

The trooper proceeded to tell me a couple of anecdotal stories about CHLs who had neglected to inform him - sometimes at all - sometimes until he returned to the car after running their license. Then he addressed my question on their instruction:

"I had another area instructor who didn't inform me until 3 minutes into the stop. We discussed how he should have handled it, but he acted very cocky about the whole thing."

"Other than the requirement to inform," he added, "CHL-holders are very law-abiding people."

In Ohio, the law that is imposed upon persons issued a license to carry a concealed handgun who are carrying a concealed handgun and are stopped for a law enforcement purpose is strict - it was strict when the concealed carry law was first passed in 2004, and in 2006 the General Assembly actually expanded the restrictions when they passed HB347.

Ohio law mandates that when a licensee from the state of Ohio (or those reciprocal states who are traveling here!) is carrying, and is stopped for a law enforcement purpose, they shall "promptly inform any law enforcement officer who approaches the person after the person has been stopped that the person has been issued a license or temporary emergency license to carry a concealed handgun and that the person then is carrying a concealed handgun."

Since this seems not to be getting through to everyone in their training classes, it bears repeating: IF YOU ARE A CHL-HOLDER AND ARE CARRYING A CONCEALED HANDGUN IN OHIO, YOU MUST INFORM LAW ENFORCEMENT IF YOU ARE STOPPED FOR A LAW ENFORCEMENT PURPOSE.

Still not convinced that this is important? Then consider that failure to promptly inform a law enforcement officer can result in being charged with a first degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a $1000 fine! As if that weren't bad enough, probation (and the resulting loss of privileges and freedoms) may be tacked on to the jail term. No matter what type of punishment the judge settles on, a conviction WILL result in the suspension of the concealed handgun license for a period of one year from the date of conviction.

NOTE: During deliberations on HB347, certain interested parties lobbied to make "failure in inform" a felony. Only through the combined efforts of Buckeye Firearms Association and the NRA was this attempt defeated.

Beyond the requirement that CHL-holders traveling in Ohio must inform law enforcement officers that they have a license and are carrying, the law was modified by HB347 to mandate that licensees keep their hands in "plain sight" beginning when the officer approaches the vehicle and until they leave, and comply with all lawful orders given by the officer during the stop, or be charged with a first degree misdemeanor. A second conviction on failure to keep hands in "plain sight" or failure to comply with lawful orders earns a fifth degree felony!

Finally, HB347 requires that if the licenseholder who is carrying can be charged with a fifth-degree felony if, while being stopped for a law enforcement purpose, "knowingly remove[s] or attempt[s] to remove the loaded handgun from the holster, pocket, or other place in which the person is carrying it, knowingly grasp[s] or hold[s] the loaded handgun, or knowingly [has] contact with the loaded handgun by touching it with the person's hands or fingers at any time" beginning when the officer approaches the vehicle and until they leave (unless they are acting to comply with orders given by the officer).

In Ohio, a fifth-degree felony with a firearm specification is punishable by up to two years in prison and a $2,500 fine, followed by probation. In addition to the many social penalties, such as difficulty finding employment, felons lose their Constitutional rights to even own a firearm and to vote.

THESE REQUIREMENTS APPLY TO YOU IF YOU ARE AN OCCUPANT IN A MOTOR VEHICLE ON AN OHIO ROADWAY - NOT JUST TO YOU WHEN YOU ARE DRIVING.

Do I have your attention yet?

Ohio's firearms laws contain far too many places where a gun owner who is doing their best to follow the law can be trapped on a technicality. The "failure to inform" statute is no different.

For instance, not even most instructors (and thus their students) are aware that the duty to inform applies to each police officer who approaches a CHL-holder during a stop. If you are stopped by a partner cruiser, Officer A does the initial approach, the CHL-holder must inform them. If Officer B subsequently approaches, you are required to notify Officer B, and C, D, E and F if more arrive on the scene.

Ohio gun owners are well aware of our antiquated, backwards laws relating to gun ownership and usage. These requirements certainly fall within that same category. But as it stands, the law is what the law is, and we have a duty as law-abiding CHL-holders to follow it.

In my CHL classes, I not only stress the importance of the law-enforcement-stop portion of the law, but I also conduct role-playing exercises whereby the student is asked to put into practice the law they have just been taught.

No one plans to be pulled over by a law enforcement officer. Thus, as I instruct my students, it is most important that the CHL-holder think ahead:

Each and every time you get into a motor vehicle (whether as a driver or other occupant!), after properly storing the your loaded firearm according one of the legal methods, make a mental note of what you would do and what your obligations are when stopped by law enforcement - today might be that day!

Find a safe place to store your driver's license and CHL. Do you normally carry your driver's license and CHL in a way that makes them difficult to access at a stop without violating the requirement that hands remain in "plain sight"? Are they located in close proximity to your firearm (such as in your purse?), making it difficult to avoid violating the requirement that no hand or finger contact shall be made with the firearm?

Don't begin rifling around the inside of the vehicle looking for your license and registration as soon as your car stops on the roadside. The officer has no way of knowing what you are looking for. Simply roll down your window and turn on your dome light (at night) as a courtesy to the officer. Then place your hands at 10 and 2 on the steering wheel, in "plain sight", and await the officer's approach.

The officer will likely run your license plate through the law enforcement computer database before approaching your car. If you are driving, and the vehicle is titled to you, the officer will be notified that you are a CHL-holder. This in NO way eliminates your obligation to inform the officer that you have a license and are carrying. Also, if the vehicle is not titled to you, or if you are a passenger in someone else's vehicle, the officer will have no way of knowing about your license until you inform them.

As soon as you can after the officer's greeting and/ or instructions, inform the officer as follows: "I will comply with your orders, but before I do I am required to inform you that I have a license to carry a concealed firearm and I am carrying." THIS IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. Some jurisdictions have been creating a trap between the "promptly comply with the orders of an officer" and "inform at point of first contact." They come to the CHL holder's vehicle and immediately order, "License and registration, proof of insurance," presenting the CHL-holder with a dilemma of choosing between failing to comply with a lawful order and failing to promptly notify. By answering as outlined above (I like to stress to my students that making their first words "I have a license..." rather than "I have a gun..." is likely to have better result), the CHL holder acknowledges the order and indicates compliance, but also promptly informs.

The officer will likely ask you where the firearm is stored. So long as your firearm isn't in the same place as your license, registration, proof of insurance, it should be smooth sailing from there.

Remember that Ohio law allows officers to take possession of your firearm during the traffic stop. They are not likely to do so, and in fact some law enforcement entities have instructed their officers NOT to do so due to liability concerns. However, don't let this surprise, concern or offend you if they do so. The law mandates that the officer return the firearm to you at the conclusion of the stop, unless you are being charged with a violation related to the firearm (or are being placed into custody for something else entirely).

Practicing these every time you enter a motor vehicle, until they become habits, will ensure that if you are stopped by a law enforcement officer, you will be one of the good ambassadors for the CHL community. I highly encourage firearms instructors to put more emphasis on this portion of the law during your concealed carry courses. What will it say about you if your students are inadvertently breaking the law on a regular basis?

One final note. From time to time, on those pro-gun Internet discussion forums I referred to earlier, someone will post a story on a law enforcement officer who seemed to be enjoying their authority just a bit too much, or about one that seemed less familiar with concealed handgun laws than the poster was. I would humbly ask that, in view of the story I just told, the pro-gun community keep in mind that there is evidence to suggest that for every one officer like those they complain about, there are dozens and dozens who are being extremely gracious with CHL-holders who, by either ignorance or forgetfulness, are failing to fulfill their obligations under the law.

[Chad D. Baus is an NRA-Certified Firearms Instructor, and the Buckeye Firearms Association Northwest Ohio Chair.]


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 07/18/2007 9:28:08 AM PDT by kiriath_jearim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

No requirement to inform in Colorado. I haven’t had the situation occur, but I wonder if it is a good idea to inform an officer anyway. Any thoughts on informing that you are carrying if not required by state law?


2 posted on 07/18/2007 9:34:21 AM PDT by MtnClimber (http://www.imwithfred.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I haven’t been stopped since I got my CHL (FL) but if I was I would simply hand both cards to the officer. And we do not have a duty to inform.


3 posted on 07/18/2007 9:35:04 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

The “keeping both hands in plain sight” is just a good idea, whether it is the law in your area, or not. My philosophy, which I practice, and have taught my boys, is to do everything possible to keep any LEO you contact “at ease”. Veiled threats, lack of cooperation, and disrespect are mostly for chumps who like to chew on sod while being cuffed...


4 posted on 07/18/2007 9:37:08 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (You can take the boy out of the country, but you just can't get the smell off his shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

Letting an officer know you have a licensed, concealed firearm is good common sense, in addition to being required by law. You don’t want him finding out on his own, and then thinking you are trying to hide the fact.

That could get dangerous.


5 posted on 07/18/2007 9:40:56 AM PDT by gridlock (If Hillary loses, she can dump Bill and find love in the arms of a new man while she's still young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

Bump


6 posted on 07/18/2007 9:42:27 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hegemony Cricket

An officer who feels safe is a happy officer. A happy officer is much more likely to give you a warning, rather than a ticket.

Things that make an officer feel unsafe are standing out in traffic, weapons, and furtive movements. You make the officer happy, and he’ll make you happy.

Save the debates about the righteousness of traffic stops for a time when you are not stuck out on the side of the road with an officers ticket book in his hand.


7 posted on 07/18/2007 9:43:09 AM PDT by gridlock (If Hillary loses, she can dump Bill and find love in the arms of a new man while she's still young.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

If you get stopped in Ohio, make sure your seat belt is on and put both hands on the top of the wheel.

My daughter (not carrying) was stopped going a bit fast. She was wearing her belt. When he asked for her drivers license, she unbuckled it. As he was writing her up, he said she was not wearing her seat belt. She said she had it on but unbuckled it to get her license. He said he was just going to give her a warning.

So, leave the belt on. When you need to unbuckle, tell him you are going to unbuckle the belt to get your wallet.

Some folks will not like being subservient to the officer, but those are the facts. Put yourself in their place and you would want people these days to inform you of their moves ahead of time.

Obviously if you are carrying, that is the first thing you should tell him or her. I can’t believe anyone wouldn’t realize they need to do that.


8 posted on 07/18/2007 9:45:32 AM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
"Other than the requirement to inform," he added, "CHL-holders are very law-abiding people."

Texas had that requirement when I lived there and I always complied, but Missouri does not.

As a matter of fact, my Missouri instructor said not to inform the officer even as a courtesy.

I guess that might be related to the fact that Missouri does not require a CCW to keep a loaded handgun in your vehicle.

9 posted on 07/18/2007 9:55:25 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazcat

Michigan has a duty to inform. I was stopped recently by a very professional Detroit officer. Apparently he clocked me a few miles over. I gave him my DL and CCW cards. He asked if I had a weapon. I told him no. He then asked why I had a commercial drivers license. I told him that I drive kids to a Christian camp in buses. He handed them back and said to drive slower.

Ahhh, two get out of jail free cards.


10 posted on 07/18/2007 10:00:36 AM PDT by cyclotic (Support Scouting-Raising boys to be men, and politically incorrect at the same time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I was stopped a few years ago on I-35 near Austin, TX, and handed the officer both cards. She asked me to step out of my truck (my wife and two young daughters still inside) and keep my hands out of my pockets. I received my ticket for speeding and was courteous throughout. I couldn’t help feel like I was being viewed as a potential criminal, although the background check and training makes CHL probably the best friend a cop ever had among the citizenry.


11 posted on 07/18/2007 10:03:16 AM PDT by manic4organic (Send a care package through USO today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
I wouldn't tell them anything I didn't have to. But then I'm a 63-yr-old woman - who would suspect me of having a handgun anyway?

Carolyn

12 posted on 07/18/2007 10:04:33 AM PDT by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
I was incredulous, and, to be honest, a bit skeptical. How could so many CHL-holders be that ignorant about their obligations at traffic stops?

Just one question: How did the officer know the individuals were carrying and were license holders if they did not inform the officers of this fact? Seems like the officers were lying.

There is no law that you have to disclose your permit to LEOs in CA, as a matter of fact you are discouraged from doing so by a lot of instructors of firearms training classes. At one time it was taught to do so as a coutesy until some overzealous LEOs jailed a few permit holders because they didn't like the way their licenses looked(true story). Some CA cops seem to go off the deep end if they find out you are carrying.

Stopped for a traffic violation? Say "yes, sir", "no,sir" and "thank you sir" and drive off with your ticket. Legal and wise thing to do in CA.

I have always wondered at the stupidity that goes into making a law that requires you to disclose a permit and the fact you are armed. If you are a criminal you are not going to have a permit and you sure as he** are not going to tell the cop you are armed. If you are a permit holder you are most likely(about 99.9 percent)to be law abiding and very, very unlikely to use your weapon on the cop. It just boggles the mind when you think about the mentality of the people running this country.

13 posted on 07/18/2007 10:09:49 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calex59
Just one question: How did the officer know the individuals were carrying and were license holders if they did not inform the officers of this fact? Seems like the officers were lying.

Probably pops up on their records check.

14 posted on 07/18/2007 10:14:17 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Don’t you think that when the LEO “runs” your plates and then your license number that their computer WILL VOLUNTEER the CCW license info anyway?


15 posted on 07/18/2007 10:14:26 AM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim

I live in Ohio, and I haven’t gone without a firearm in my vehicle for well over twenty five years now, and counting. I don’t hold a Concealed Weapons Permit.

On the few occasions I’ve been pulled over for one thing or another, I’ve always informed the Officer that I have a loaded firearm in the vehicle.

They’ve always said “Thanks for telling me”....and that was it. No citation, no warning, not even a question about my having or not having a permit.

In short, my interactions with the local PD on this topic has been very good.


16 posted on 07/18/2007 10:18:09 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George from New England

They don’t have that information available in CA. When they pull your license up all it shows is driver’s license information. I doubt most states have that information on their driving records, it is not legal to do so. If they do have that info why does the driver have to disclose anything? As I say, they most likely don’t have that info on the driving records.


17 posted on 07/18/2007 10:18:26 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
"Things that make an officer feel unsafe are standing out in traffic..."

Oh yeah, that reminds me of another pet peeve of mine - stoopid people who are pulled over, and who basically stop in the middle of the road. Dumb, dumb, dumb! Not only do they put the officer at risk, but they serve as a big dumb roadblock for everyone else trying to get through the area. FGS, drive a half a block to where you can get off the roadway - the officer and everyone else will thank you for it!
18 posted on 07/18/2007 10:23:06 AM PDT by Hegemony Cricket (You can take the boy out of the country, but you just can't get the smell off his shoes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kiriath_jearim
...been stopped twice (and let go)and was rear-ended by an uninsured motorist who began a verbal triad at me. The officers thanked me and complemented me on not escalating the verbal argument at the scene of an accident. I never said a word till the officer arrived on scene.

...you should have seen the idiot’s face when she found out I had a 9mm strapped to my ankle (informed by the officer).

19 posted on 07/18/2007 10:57:13 AM PDT by mr_hammer (Show me just what liberalism brought that was new, and there you will find things evil & inhuman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I live in Ohio, and I haven’t gone without a firearm in my vehicle for well over twenty five years now, and counting. I don’t hold a Concealed Weapons Permit.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

just interested big or small town, urban or rural area.


20 posted on 07/18/2007 10:59:48 AM PDT by CHICAGOFARMER (Dam right about time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson