Posted on 07/17/2007 4:44:52 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Hey stop f@!#ing deleting and banning Republicans who are for Ron Paul you piece of garbage. Just because we disagree with neocons on some issues doesnt mean you should ban us! You act like some f@!#ing Communist who stifles all dissenting opinions. If you and your goons werent going around banning all who disagree with Fred Thompsons fat ugly evil looking ass you would see Ron Paul Republicans all over your neocon front website. Ron Paul Republicans would destroy your neocon minions easily if we werent constantly banned you filth. You did the same bull s!@t to Pat Buchanan supporters. F#!! you and all your little posters who get away with calling Ron Paul names without any facts or anything real to say.
Btw Fred Thompson is a disgustingly evil looking bald bastard, Rino who has no chance of winning or beating any democrat. Support your little fake conservative crony you motherF#!!er.
Ping! :)
Check this out. Now we know why Karl Childers is Dr. Demento’s campaign manager.
As with most politicians, it’s more about talking a good game than actually playing a good game.
;) hehehbehehe. Good one.
ping? you are so eeeeeviilllll. :->
Ah, now you’ve done it!
rosie from the view
Neo-con minions???
Is that a sandwich?
“you should ban us!”
OKay.
LOL! You are baaaad!
“Ron Paul should not even be considered a Republican.
Who the heck would think that electing an Ob/gyn to the Presidency , during a time of hot war, would be a good idea?
Let him run as the Libertarian that he is .”
Would someone tell me what is un-republican about Ron Paul? It seems to me that he is the only principled person running that truly follows the Constitution. The leaders of both parties have completely abandoned small government ideals and it is simply a race for who can sound the best. I can remember G.W. Bush advocated a hands off foreign policy and a non-intrusive government and I voted for him. But Bush has made Clinton look like a fiscal conservative!
Now the ranter that started this post was quite absurd but he is quite the minority when it comes to Ron Paul supporters.
....and here we go.....
No, Paul talks more about the Constitution, but the way he chooses his battles is far from principled.. he chooses the fight against our national security by arguing the Constitutionality of the word force vs. war, but he has no problem in 'playing the game' when it comes to sending pork back to his district to preserve wetlands or build a cable car in Galveston.
Paul is conservative, and probably a great person, but he isn't the second coming of Hamilton that people think he is..
Doesn’t strike me as the literate type.
"I sent Dr. Demento all my money I usually spend on my french fried taters. It's a crazy time to live these here days, and we needs a crazy guy. It's about time America elected a President someone who's just like me. I'm Karl Childers, and I approve this message. Uh huh."
Well I have mixed views on his Iraq policy as I initially supporting going into Iraq. But over time I do wonder if his “no” vote made the most sense.
You tell me any other candidate that is running that truly believes in a drastically smaller government and less intrusion on personal freedoms and I will seriously consider supporting that person.
I lived in TN when Thompson was a senator and he seems like a decent guy but nothing to get excited about.
I would suggest that some of the votes for “pork” may be twisting a vote to mean something that it is not but I have not read the legislation you are referring to.
Alex Jones? Is that you?
Certified fruit loop fit to be canned and banned.
Again, not saying this is all bad, if he wasn't proclaimed to be such a purist, just pointing out that other than the talk, he isn't that far from Chuck Hagel.
As for Iraq, that could be a whole other thread, I just choose to listen to the military in charge and not the press.. unless you can show where we had a time machine and knew exactly what would happen, it is hard to judge people who had a pile of facts and had to make a choice.. How do we know how the world would look if we didn't act?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.