Posted on 07/13/2007 9:54:23 PM PDT by monomaniac
Would hold US troops fighting "War on Terror" as hostages in exchange for sweeping "hate crimes" legislation
WASHINGTON, D.C., July 13, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Senate Democrats will hold US troops fighting the "War on Terror" as hostages in exchange for sweeping "hate crimes" legislation if the Senate votes this week, perhaps as early as Monday, to include it in the defense spending bill.
Instead of introducing the legislation giving sexual orientation "hate crimes" protection as a separate bill, Senators Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and Gordon Smith (R-OR) opted to introduce the "Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act" as one of hundreds of amendments to the Defense Reauthorization bill requested by President Bush.
"There's no question this is an attempt to sneak the bill in under the most shameful circumstances because they are attaching it to the defense of our military troops," Mat Staver, founder of the Liberty Counsel told LifeSiteNews.com.
Sens. Kennedy and Smith's strategy, Staver said, forces the President into a terrible dilemma: President Bush must either approve "hate crimes" legislation or veto the entire spending bill thus leaving US troops fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan without new support and dwindling resources. Since the President has no line-item veto, approval of the defense bill is an all or nothing deal.
"This is an underhanded ploy by liberals in the Senate to try to force Bush to sign dangerous hate crimes legislation into law," said Matt Barber, policy director for cultural issues at Concerned Women for America (CWA). "I would suspect that [Bush] would send this back to the Senate and say 'quit playing games with the lives of our troops' and have them send a clean bill to his desk to get these troops taken care of."
In May, the US House of Representatives passed H.R. 1592 the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act, a bill similar to the Senate version proposed by Sens. Kennedy and Smith, that would insert "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" into existing hate crimes provisions, and give the federal government unprecedented involvement in local law enforcement.
The President had promised to veto any "hate crimes" legislation, calling the bill "constitutionally questionable." A statement from the White House said, "There has been no persuasive demonstration of any need to federalize such a potentially large range of violent crime enforcement." http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07050302.html
Conservative groups have charged that "hate crimes" equals "thought crimes" and carries major implications for the religious freedom of Christians and other religious groups who preach homosexual behavior is intrinsically disordered and immoral. Such fears were confirmed when Rep. Artur Davis, a supporter of the bill, admitted that under this law a pastor could be charged with the crime of incitement if the he preached against homosexuality and a person in the congregation left church and committed a crime against a homosexual. http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07042601.html
CWA's Barber told LifeSiteNews.com that pro-family advocates must tell their respective senators to vote against the "hate crimes" amendment. "The grassroots, people of faith, people of conservative values and principles must be contacting their senators and let them know that any hate crimes legislation is unacceptable and they need to do whatever they can to fight this legislation," he said.
CitizenLink provides a page to find contact information for elected officials:
http://vocusgr.vocus.com/GRSPACE2/WebPublish/controller.aspx?SiteName=FOTF&Definition=Home&XSL=Home&SV_Section=Home
See related coverage by LifeSiteNews.com:
Democrats Refuse Religious Freedom Amendment to Hate Crimes Bill
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07042601.html
CWA Claims Fake "Hate Crimes" Being Used to Force Legislation through Congress
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/apr/07041107.html
US House Passes Gay Hate Crime Bill
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07050405.html
President Bush Promises to Veto Homosexual Hate Crime Bill if Passed
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/may/07050302.html
Why do they do this?
Why?
Because it’s the only way they would ever succeed at pushing pure communism into the US; underhandedly.
I’m honestly so angry at this point that not only does nothing surprise me anymore, but if an armed revolt happened tomorrow I’d be at the front of the pack with enough ammo to supply myself and my 5 nearest companions.
The only problem is that it’s going to have to get a lot worse, and this country is going to have to take some giant losses before people in general are angry enough to do something about it. People in general are also very stupid and won’t realize it’s too late till they have no money, no property and no freedom left.
The answer is quite simple. Power and control at any cost.
I tend to censor myself quite a bit these days. I’d get banned if I started posting the full... flavor of what I think about these different affronts to the US.
Sorry. I can only post images. I am at a complete loss for words.
THIS is why the approval ratings for Congress approach single digits.
The aborted are victims of genocide.
LOL, well you aint the only one =)
Bush better not sign it. That’s all I got to say.
Abortion is not genocicde as it is not aimed at on particular race. It is a way to escape responsibility.
bump
ping
Ted Kennedy is becoming the greatest danger this country has faced since WW2.
Is there no end to his liberal, treasonous, America hating work?
The Pubs better find their wedding tackle and take this bloviated, Chivas besotted whale on.
The Constitution and this Republic are not safe with the general of the battle of Chappaquiddick around.
Ted isn't. Those who go to bed with him are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.