Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida man owes $10,000 for child who's not his
cnn.com ^ | 7/12/07 | cnn

Posted on 07/13/2007 6:00:54 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: zencat

“Folks, “It Takes a Village...””

Right . . . the judge should levy child support on the “village” . . . which is really the ultimate effect of the decision to become a single mother by these amoral women. And yes, the amoral dipstick sperm contributors (I won’t call them men or fathers) bear responsiblity, too.


41 posted on 07/13/2007 7:31:31 AM PDT by RatRipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: picard

The best interest of the child is justice between the parents.

Always.


42 posted on 07/13/2007 7:32:17 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Any order for child support for a child that he is not the father of is a travesty of justice...but hey...how long has it been since our legal system has actually put the just in JUSTice?


44 posted on 07/13/2007 7:43:27 AM PDT by TheBattman (I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl

The tragic thing is - if the girl’s biological father shows up and wants to assume the role of “daddy”, and the mother goes along with it, there is very little your friend can probably do if it goes to court.


45 posted on 07/13/2007 7:49:32 AM PDT by RabidBartender (Al-Qaeda doesn't need an intelligence network. They have the U.S. media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32
Of course this is ridiculous and a hideous display of legalized injustice.

The girl's mother evidently has said that Rodriguez should not be paying child support. She could--and should--return the money to him.

A man should NEVER be required to pay child support involuntarily for a child whom he did not father. In a case (and there have been many) in which a child's mother knowningly and fraudulently causes a man to think that he is the child's father and thus fraudulently extorts child support payments from him, the woman should be subject to civil suit--by the man, his wife, and his children--for recovery of all child support payments paid, with interest, and for punative damages.

That's a no-brainer--that is for anyone who values justice.

46 posted on 07/13/2007 7:52:36 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
And if the child's biological father is complicit in the fraud and distortion, he should be subject to the same civil action and the same recovery of past payments, with interest, and punative action--by the man falsely accused, his wife, and this children.

This is another no-brainer.

47 posted on 07/13/2007 7:55:29 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Ignore the will of the people at your peril, Political "Aristocrats"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Kid’s not mine, either.

What do I owe?


48 posted on 07/13/2007 7:56:18 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

I want to see the judgement reversed, recoup of all legal fees, and a judgement rendered for this aggrieved non-father to the tune of 500,000.00.


49 posted on 07/13/2007 8:00:17 AM PDT by Lazamataz (JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Kid’s not mine, either. What do I owe?

Depends.

Whatchya got?

50 posted on 07/13/2007 8:00:51 AM PDT by Lazamataz (JOIN THE NRA: https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signup.asp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RabidBartender

Fortunately the girl is 19 now. I think he’s pretty safe anyway, sounded like the ex had several friends during the marriage, the dad of the girl, probably doesn’t have and will never have a clue he has a child. Sad perhaps for him if he knew.

Then again, it could be my friends child after all, sometimes they don’t take dad’s characteristics. All the confusion and wonder just adds to the case of how important it is to be faithful in a marriage. I imagine he’ll go to his death bed never knowing if the child is actually his.


51 posted on 07/13/2007 8:02:02 AM PDT by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Shimmer128
As “El Rushbo” said, “Words have meanings.”

The terms ‘bastard’ and ‘slut’ were part of our language long before ‘single parent’ was made the PCSpeak mandated substitute for ‘slut’.

PS A child of a ‘single parent’ is still a ‘bastard’ regardless of what anyone says.

Yes, those terms are both pejorative and derogatory - but accurate. Most important of all, they were effective at reducing the number of bastards.

52 posted on 07/13/2007 8:04:12 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chesley
I wish more judges felt like you do.

As soon as I got divorced I felt I was being treated as a criminal complete with probation.

With everything I do and every move I make, I have to register with the State. My entire financial life is in the hands of the State.

The way it works is, they take as much from my paycheck as they want to pay themselves and my wife and I get to keep whatever residual is left over.

My wife and daughters best interest is constantly before the court whereas my interests and well being is literally irrelevant. And could not mean this in a stronger sense.

I am the villain, the criminal, the guilty party; they are the victims. I must be made to pay no matter what.

53 posted on 07/13/2007 8:06:47 AM PDT by picard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

“And just think of what this is doing to the girl...”

How about what the mother did to the girl instead. The entire blame lies on her for the fraud she has perpetrated.
Everytime they run these articles, they always try to paint the one who was conned as this selfish guy who is punishing the kids. I can understand its an emotionally complicated thing. But how come its always, “the mother declined to be interviewed.......” We know exactly why she did. Because she’s a fraud and dragged her children into this as well. I’m sure if these men were not getting screwed over in courts, many more would be open to being friends with these children and being involved in their lives.

I have a best friend who has been involved in a very similar set of circumstances. Finding out after a few years of paying child support that the kid isn’t his and the mother picked him to claim he was the father because he made a decent living. Surprise, surprise, the courts are going after him, not the biological father to financially support this child.

How come we never hear of the courts going after the real fathers to pay the child support? Because the biased family courts aren’t interested in that. All they care about is finding some male who was dumb enough to work hard and make something of themselves to foot the bill for someone elses fraud and bad decisions.


54 posted on 07/13/2007 8:07:26 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: econjack

Then take the list and do DNA on all the men. She can go on The Maury Povich Show have it done for free. Some of the me would get to the “I’m-not-your-baby’s-Daddy dance, but not all of them.


55 posted on 07/13/2007 8:12:44 AM PDT by quikdrw (Life is tough....it's even tougher if you are stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: picard

far as I’m concerned, all it takes is some obscure allegation from the woman and the man is immediately, completely and totally guilty of that allegation (in this case a child which isn’t his) and must prove innocence. On top of that, he must be made to pay the ex-wife support/alimony, with no hope of recovering his money when and if the obscure allegations are proven false. On top of that, he’s out whatever legal fees he had to pay to get out of the mess, while ex-wifey walks away scott free, loading her guns for the next round..

the system is loaded against the male..


56 posted on 07/13/2007 8:13:14 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32 (Every Democrat Party cause eventually becomes a business then it degenerates into a racket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tioga
We have DNA testing now, we need to make it the legal proof needed to establish paternity.

That, and also to allow the appeal of old cases where there's a claim of no paternity (like this one), with an AUTOMATIC revocation of the child support order and restitution to the "former" father. Anything else is a horribly monstrous injustice.

Me, I'd give away my assets to family or friends, wait about 90 days and then refuse to work and go on welfare. Let's see them collect from that.

57 posted on 07/13/2007 8:14:47 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Typical democrat party hack judges at work. In that epi-center of juck justice: Florida.

Ferociously anti-male gross miscarraiges of justice ensue.


58 posted on 07/13/2007 8:16:02 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (The ideal tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

I know, but it was in the article, a different man. He said he “had to” cut the child off. I say “then you didn’t love her to begin with!!!!!”


59 posted on 07/13/2007 8:22:07 AM PDT by Shimmer128 (A man has only 1 escape from his old self: to see a different self in the mirror of his woman's eyes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: picard

I feel for you. Fortunately, I have not gone through a divorce. More my wife’s doing than mine. It helps to get the right woman.


60 posted on 07/13/2007 8:22:15 AM PDT by chesley (Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson