Skip to comments.
A Mighty Bomb (Angelina's PC Pearl does dismal B.O.)
Box Office Mojo ^
| 7/8/07
Posted on 07/09/2007 4:22:39 PM PDT by AnnaZ
Opening weekend numbers:
JUNE 2007
| Sunday |
Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
Saturday |
| 17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 Rank
Daily Gross
Change Y/L*
Theaters / Average
Gross-to-date |
22 10
$1,207,775
- / -
1,355 / $891
$1,207,775 / 1
|
23 10
$1,641,759
35.9% / -
1,355 / $1,212
$2,849,534 / 2
|
24 10
$1,099,329
-33% / -
1,355 / $811
$3,948,863 / 3
|
25 10
$397,391
-63.9% / -
1,355 / $293
|
(Excerpt) Read more at boxofficemojo.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: amightyheart; angelinajolie; boxoffice; danielpearl; hollywoodleft; mariannepearl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Third weekend:
JULY 2007
| Sunday |
Monday |
Tuesday |
Wednesday |
Thursday |
Friday |
Saturday |
1 14
$467,405
-28.3% / -57.5%
1,350 / $346
$7,005,463 / 10
|
2 15
$192,840
-58.7% / -51.5%
1,350 / $143
$7,198,303 / 11
|
3 16
$163,496
-15.2% / -60.9%
720 / $227
$7,361,799 / 12
|
4 16
$256,382
56.8% / -25.3%
720 / $356
$7,618,181 / 13
|
5 16
$139,428
-45.6% / -55.1%
720 / $194
$7,757,609 / 14
|
6 -
$188,735
35.4% / -59.7%
651 / $290
$7,946,344 / 15
|
7 -
$268,267
42.1% / -58.8%
651 / $412
$8,214,611 / 16
|
8 -
$190,286
-29.1% / -59.3%
651 / $292
$8,404,897 / 17
|
9 |
1
posted on
07/09/2007 4:22:42 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
To: AnnaZ
why would I want to go see such a depressing story? And when these actresses and actors create such a Personna politically it is hard to see them in any role and believe they are the character on the screen.
2
posted on
07/09/2007 4:25:53 PM PDT
by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(We need a troop surge in New Orleans and Philly!)
To: AnnaZ
And what movie is this???
3
posted on
07/09/2007 4:26:14 PM PDT
by
technomage
(The true Conservative politician will win every time.)
To: AnnaZ
The nude sex scene with Eason Jordan was really, really repulsive.
To: technomage
Oops, sorry 'bout that... it's A Mighty Heart.
5
posted on
07/09/2007 4:33:39 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: martin_fierro
Please, and feel free to, tell me that you just made that up.
6
posted on
07/09/2007 4:35:07 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: AnnaZ
Good. The thought of making a movie to celebrate the people who murdered Daniel Pearl is so disgusting I can’t find words for it.
7
posted on
07/09/2007 4:35:21 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
why would I want to go see such a depressing story? Still... it reallyreally bombed. It must've been reallyreally bad.
8
posted on
07/09/2007 4:37:08 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: AnnaZ
One should keep in mind that this was basically an art house movie with slight delusions of grandeur. I don’t think anyone was expecting block buster numbers on a movie with a $16 million budget with an initial release to 1300 theaters. Of course it’s not on a pace to even break even on the domestic release so that’s bad no matter what the budget, but it hasn’t been released abroad yet so there’s a good chance it’ll break even then.
9
posted on
07/09/2007 4:39:32 PM PDT
by
discostu
(indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
To: Cicero
Good. The thought of making a movie to celebrate the people who murdered Daniel Pearl is so disgusting I cant find words for it.That's how I'm figuring it too... from what I read in reviews they didn't really call spades spades.
10
posted on
07/09/2007 4:39:35 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: technomage
>And what movie is this???
This is the one where
Muslim nuts chop the head off
some reporter guy.
(As much as we hate
terrorists, it's hard to get
too worked up over
a reporter's death.
Sure, let's catch the scum killers,
but spare me the film!)
To: AnnaZ
she will get an oscar nomination tho.....watch...lol
12
posted on
07/09/2007 4:41:19 PM PDT
by
advertising guy
(If computer skills named us, I'd be back-space delete.)
To: discostu
1300 screens is not really "art house", though. It's not Spiderman 3, but Sicko started at 1, went to 440, and now plays on slightly over 600. That's art house.
13
posted on
07/09/2007 4:42:44 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: AnnaZ
A Mighty BombMaybe if they called it "A mighty Boob" it might have done better.
14
posted on
07/09/2007 4:42:44 PM PDT
by
Popman
(I removed my Bushbot brain chip after he didn't veto the McCain Feingold election anti freedom bill)
To: theFIRMbss
To be fair, the Pearl slaughter was huge news. We may be a little used to videos of Islamic atrocities now, but I believe that was the first publicized, videotaped beheading (sawing off).
Also, Daniel Pearl had to admit to his Jewishness before the hacking, so it was a stunning revelation of the beastliness and hatred of the enemy (even vis a vis a post-9/11 world).
It could have been a powerful film, but I guess cast and crew preferred to remain fatwa-free.
15
posted on
07/09/2007 4:49:04 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: AnnaZ
I think that was part of their error. It’s definitely too wide a release for an art house movie, yet it’s from Paramount Vantage which is their art house sub-studio (here’s their Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paramount_Vantage I’m a movie nerd and I haven’t even heard of 1/3 of their movies). Going for that large a release probably meant leaving the art house, which is a sure fire way of turning off an art house crowd (and staring a big boobed sex pot probably didn’t bring in the art house dweebs either). But it never got anywhere near a true major release or even semi-major release (Clerks 2, with the typical Mirimax/ Weinstein sub $6 million budget, hit 2100 theaters for it’s widest release).
Which brings up the interesting question of which idiot decided to spend $16 million making an art house movie? Really I count this movie as poorly considered more than a flop. If they’d spent the proper art house budget ($2 to $5 million) the money it’s made would be considered a success, but they over spent, and possibly over released too.
16
posted on
07/09/2007 4:49:55 PM PDT
by
discostu
(indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
To: advertising guy
she will get an oscar nomination tho.....watch...lolYou're probably right, although there have been serious rumblings about the un-PC nature of Ms. Jolie having to darken her skin for the flick, instead of just hiring a less melanin-challenged actress ("Not since Mickey Rooney played Yunioshi....!" LOL).
Decisions, decisions...
17
posted on
07/09/2007 4:55:02 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: discostu
Which brings up the interesting question of which idiot decided to spend $16 million making an art house movie? Brad Pitt?
18
posted on
07/09/2007 5:01:31 PM PDT
by
AnnaZ
(I keep 2 magnums in my desk.One's a gun and I keep it loaded.Other's a bottle and it keeps me loaded)
To: AnnaZ
Somebody higher than that had to green light that budget though. Unless Brad blew his budget while getting (initiate ban avoidance dots)...
19
posted on
07/09/2007 5:04:47 PM PDT
by
discostu
(indecision may or may not be my biggest problem)
To: AnnaZ
That is what happens when you ban Fox News from the press junket. Does that idiot realize they are the top rated news, and local stations across the country?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson