Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

`Suspicion' about Libby's commutation
Yahoo ^

Posted on 07/08/2007 8:18:34 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

`Suspicion' about Libby's commutation

By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer 25 minutes ago

The Democrat probing President Bush's decision to erase the prison sentence of a former White House aide said Sunday there is "the suspicion" the aide might have fingered others in the Bush administration if he served time.

The House Judiciary Committee chairman spoke of "the general impression" that Bush last week commuted I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's 2 1/2 year sentence in the CIA leak case to keep Libby quiet. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., has scheduled a committee hearing Wednesday on the matter.

Bush contended Libby's sentence was too harsh. Libby was convicted of lying and obstructing justice in an investigation into the leak of a CIA officer's identity. The former operative said the White House was trying to discredit her husband, a critic of Bush's Iraq policy.

Conyers said the hearings would include pardons made by President Clinton, the first President Bush and possibly other past presidents. In the closing hours of his presidency, Clinton pardoned 140 people, including fugitive financier Marc Rich.

"What we have here — and I think we should put it on the table right at the beginning — is that the suspicion was that if Mr. Libby went to prison, he might further implicate other people in the White House, and that there was some kind of relationship here that does not exist in any of President Clinton's pardons, nor, according to those that we've talked to ... is that it's never existed before, ever," Conyers said in a broadcast interview Sunday.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; cialeak; fitzmas; makingitup; nifongism; partisanwitchhunt; thecrucible; trialbymedia; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
joke.........
1 posted on 07/08/2007 8:18:35 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Conyers is a grandstanding fool.


2 posted on 07/08/2007 8:21:16 AM PDT by Michael.SF. ("The military Mission has long since been accomplished" -- Harry Reid, April 23, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Amazing how the mere suspicion of something can become news in these politically charged times. Time was that you had to have some evidence of malfeasance before you could make a charge like this.
3 posted on 07/08/2007 8:21:19 AM PDT by SoldierDad (Proud Father of a 2nd BCT 10th Mountain Soldier fighting the terrorists in the Triangle of Death)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Contrary to Politically Corrupt Media’s overly emotional, ignorant hand wringing, our Founders never assumed the Jury or a Court to be the end all, be all, arbitrators of Justice. That why they set up a Constitutional Republic with a carefully thought out systems of checks and balances instead of a Direct Democracy subject to the emotion based whimsy’s of patisan whores like this author.

This rigged jury is EXACTLY why the Presidential Pardon powers were put into the US Constitution. The Founders realized that Justice can be perverted by a Jury or a Judge. Thus they gave the President the power to over rule the verdict of a court. A completely appropriate use of the Presidential powers.

The Founders would of applauded this President for his wise use of the power. Unlike the former President who dished out pardons to big dollar campaign contributors, sexual partners and their hangers ons, this President, after several months of careful consideration of the facts, used it to thwart a transparently partisan political persecution.


4 posted on 07/08/2007 8:23:01 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Ignorance can be cured by education, stupidity is a terminal condition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

If Libby had gone to jail, he would have been a political prisoner.


5 posted on 07/08/2007 8:27:14 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I have it from unimpeachable sources that Libby was going to finger Conyers as the leaker...


6 posted on 07/08/2007 8:28:04 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

or sandy burglar


7 posted on 07/08/2007 8:33:09 AM PDT by italianquaker ("blue dog democrats", that dog don't hunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Doing the enemy's work.. your Congress!

300 investigatinons in 100 days! What a deal! -- for radical Muslims.

"They've launched over 300 investigations, had over 350 requests for documents and interviews and they have had over 600 oversight hearings in just about 100 days," says White House spokesman Scott Stanzel.

"Hot damn!" says Rat leader. "Another war time administration to slam! Bring it all down, man!"

8 posted on 07/08/2007 8:38:03 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Not to sound like a Thinker instead of a dumb downed person but if Libby “fingered” someone, don’t you have to do that before you’re given a jail sentence?


9 posted on 07/08/2007 8:50:25 AM PDT by blueyon (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
W has the unrestricted right to pardon or grant clemency as he wishes. If one doesn't like it, don't vote for him next time.
10 posted on 07/08/2007 8:50:40 AM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I could see sending Libbey to jail for 30 months, AFTER Sandy Berger got sentenced and sent away for 3000 months!


11 posted on 07/08/2007 8:58:11 AM PDT by PinkDolphin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
"The Founders would of have applauded this President..."

A minor quibble because I'm seeing more and more of this misuse. Other than that, you're dead right.

12 posted on 07/08/2007 9:02:53 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Since MR. Conyers cares to investigate Bush’s and other presidents pardons and commutations. Perhaps he should start with Governors of each state. They also have the power to pardon and/or commute sentences.
If he starts with Alabama he should be well into his 90’s by the time he gets to Washington State. Then he could start on the federal pardons.
13 posted on 07/08/2007 9:03:50 AM PDT by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PinkDolphin

Or after Clinton was hung for treason — both of them.


14 posted on 07/08/2007 9:05:28 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So?


15 posted on 07/08/2007 9:14:15 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
.... that there was some kind of relationship here that does not exist in any of President Clinton's pardons, nor, according to those that we've talked to ... is that it's never existed before, ever," Conyers said in a broadcast interview Sunday.

Well, Libby didn't have to buy a commutation. Plus he's still on the hook for a $200K fine, unless his appeal is successful.

Clinton did all his dirty work pardoning in the dark on his last day in office. He could have done it earlier, and enjoyed eight years of praise for his "courage".

On the other hand, I'm sure the rates were confiscatory for his now-or-never pardons. The supply was going to dry up, so demand increased the going rates.

16 posted on 07/08/2007 9:17:05 AM PDT by 300winmag (Life is hard! It is even harder when you are stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

That’s what I was thinking. Conyers is a moron. You cut a deal before you are sentenced, not after.


17 posted on 07/08/2007 9:18:24 AM PDT by Vanbasten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

LOL. Liberals need to get over it!


18 posted on 07/08/2007 9:19:38 AM PDT by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turret Gunner A20

*I* would go to jail for 30 months to see treasonous people be brought to full account!


19 posted on 07/08/2007 9:46:41 AM PDT by PinkDolphin (If you think health care is costly now, wait until you get it for free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
Well, Libby didn't have to buy a commutation. Plus he's still on the hook for a $200K fine, unless his appeal is successful.

He already paid the $250K fine, and it's essentially nonrefundable. It would take an act of Congress to get it back, I think, and you know such a thing would never pass.

Certainly agree that being forced to pay the fine and lose his law license is more than enough to get him talk if he so desires. Plus the president's statement was not very kind toward him.

20 posted on 07/08/2007 10:16:40 AM PDT by freespirited (Mr. President, PUT UP THE WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson