Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Fred's Turning Into a $tealth GOP Powerhouse
New York Post ^ | July 7, 2007 | Charles Hurt

Posted on 07/07/2007 6:55:52 AM PDT by Josh Painter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: traderrob6
Someone needs to exlain to you the difference between conservativtism and and irrational hostility

If anyone wishes to see irrational hostility, just make a positive statement about Rudy and then watch the DU-like responses fly. Civility isn't a strong suit among some here on the FR.

61 posted on 07/07/2007 8:10:04 AM PDT by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvey
...since it so counterproductive to the greater Conservative cause in 2008.

Do these conciliatory comments also apply to Rudy?

Rudy is not a Conservative.

62 posted on 07/07/2007 8:10:44 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

“....who will pick up the mantle of Reagan”

In November, 1967, Washington columnist Drew Pearson reported that two top Reagan aides had been forced to resign after they were discovered in a homosexual ring with teenage boys. California newspapers had suppressed the story at the request of Reagan’s press secretary, Lyn Nofziger, but when out-of-state publications Time and Newsweek hit the stands, Californians were confronted with the story—and with the governor’s denial of it. The credibility gap widened as Reagan hotly called Pearson a liar, then changed his tone and asked that the matter be quietly dropped.

In certain areas of legislation the Reagan administration proved progressive. In 1967 one of the most liberalized abortion bills in the U.S. became law in California

http://www.trivia-library.com/c/biography-of-us-president-ronald-reagan-part-7-california-governor.htm

I post this NOT to sully Reagan(as I have been accused of before) ..but to demonstrate, that by our prayers and God’s grace, men can change. Reagan later admitted that signing that bill was a mistake.


63 posted on 07/07/2007 8:11:06 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

I can’t argue with that. I am just glad the vicious Rudy threads are behind us here.


64 posted on 07/07/2007 8:14:28 AM PDT by tioga (I'll take Duncan Hunter or Fred Thompson for President. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
"Now instead of casting our votes in fear..."

Supporting and voting to Thompson is not motivated by fear; his brand of popular conservatism plays well coast-to-coast. And will cross party lines. A fact soon realized.

"..how about we work to bring such a world closer to reality."

From what i've read the other posters are attempting that with you. Politcal parties do not nominate members from the House for President. You're gonna need a Plan B. Soon.

65 posted on 07/07/2007 8:14:37 AM PDT by LEARNED FOREVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I saw the first one also yesterday on an SUV in Miami.


66 posted on 07/07/2007 8:20:57 AM PDT by rep-always
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling

There are a few good conservatives falling for the Hillary tripe, mostly because they support this or that other candidate. Certainly, it isn’t going to stick to FDT one bit. I hope those who fall for it come to their senses quickly.

The Clintons and their leftist media bilge might create a minor headache for us to deal with. But that’s just politics.

Still, we’ve got to be smarter. We’ve got to see through the garbage. Remember, Hillary knows she cannot beat FDT in the general election. So she is doing everything she can imagine to try and derail him in the GOP primaries.

If we see through the Clinton tactics, their pathetic smear campaign will not help them one bit. And nobody in the world can be better at seeing through the Clintons than FReepers, who have been at it longer than anyone else.


67 posted on 07/07/2007 8:23:57 AM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Hey! Take it easy! Duncan Hunter would make a great VEEP for Fred! Duncan can deliver California for us! ;-)


68 posted on 07/07/2007 8:24:02 AM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil

“the same candidate who’s hired an open homosexual as a senior advisor ‘

So fags shouldn’t have jobs, no matter their skills?
No thanks. We have enough people on welfare as it is.


69 posted on 07/07/2007 8:43:58 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

How’s he going to ‘deliver California’?


70 posted on 07/07/2007 8:44:20 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (<---- is vacationing from gnats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Old_Mil
Fred Thompson's words from your mouth: "Gee, you know what, I don't ever remember doing that." Now, maybe Fred did make that off-hand comment, or maybe you are making it up. If that's what you've done, shame on you.

The story peddled by the liberals is that Fred lobbied White House official John L. Sununu on behalf of some pro-abortion group. But Sununu says, ‘I don’t recall him ever lobbying me on that at all. I don’t think that ever happened. In fact, I know that never happened.’

What does Fred have to say? Contrasted with the off-hand denial you "quote", Thompson spokesman Mark Corallo said, ‘Fred Thompson did not lobby for this group, period.’

My advice is you should cease and desist with this crap.

71 posted on 07/07/2007 8:45:15 AM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
God protect Duncan Hunter from his followers, they are not doing anything to help him.. DH4VP
72 posted on 07/07/2007 8:47:33 AM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm

Isn’t Duncan a Congresscritter from California?


73 posted on 07/07/2007 8:48:09 AM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Well, he is...but the question remains: How’s Hunter going to deliver CA?


74 posted on 07/07/2007 8:49:45 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Fred Thompson, '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

Yeah, but he’s from one small part of California. He’s never run a statewide race and the most hopeful poll I’ve seen of his had him at 11% or something like that in CA.

If Duncan could actually deliver California, there’d be a heck of a lot more people on his bandwagon. It would make him an instant national shoe-in.


75 posted on 07/07/2007 8:52:21 AM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (<---- is vacationing from gnats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: not bad at all
It doesn’t bother you that you do a great deal of damage to Duncan Hunter’s election chances by badmouthing Fred

If this is considered badmouthing, then what do you think my comments about Rudy Giuliani constitute? These are legitimate questions that need answers. If Fred declared his candidacy and participated in debates, they already would be. This isn't about Duncan Hunter, this is about where Fred Thompson stands on issues of major importance to the conservative movement.
76 posted on 07/07/2007 8:53:47 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Well, he is...but the question remains: How’s Hunter going to deliver CA?

No conservative is going to deliver California. Do you advocate nominating someone based on their ability to deliver California?
77 posted on 07/07/2007 8:54:31 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

” Does Campaign Finance Reform apply, since he’s not a candidate (yet)? I hope not. That would be sweet payback for McCain. “

That’s pretty much it. The donation limits apply, but the reporting requirements do not, at the “testing the waters” phase.


78 posted on 07/07/2007 8:55:26 AM PDT by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
“the same candidate who’s hired an open homosexual as a senior advisor ‘

So fags shouldn’t have jobs, no matter their skills?


If you can't see the difference between the original statement and your characterization of it, there's no point in my trying to explain it to you. Incidentally, no - 'Fags' shouldn't have jobs advising a political party that's supposed to represent traditional America.
79 posted on 07/07/2007 8:56:09 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LEARNED FOREVER
Politcal parties do not nominate members from the House for President.

...and senators don't win the White House.
80 posted on 07/07/2007 8:57:24 AM PDT by Old_Mil (Duncan Hunter in 2008! A Veteran, A Patriot, A Reagan Republican... http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson