Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman calls for wider use of surveillance cameras
The Hill ^ | July 1, 2007 | Klaus Marre

Posted on 07/01/2007 5:34:18 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative

Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.), the chairman of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, said Sunday he wants to “more widely” use surveillance cameras across the country.

“The Brits have got something smart going in England, and it was part of why I believe they were able to so quickly apprehend suspects in the terrorist acts over the weekend, and that is they have cameras all over London and other of their major cities,” Lieberman said.

“I think it’s just common sense to do that here much more widely,” he added. “And of course, we can do it without compromising anybody’s real privacy.”

Lieberman lamented the “petty, partisan fighting” in Congress and called on his colleagues to join together to upgrade the nation’s electronic surveillance capabilities.

“Right now, we’re at a partisan gridlock over the question of whether the American government can listen into conversations or follow e-mail trails of non-American citizen,” he said on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos. “That’s wrong. We’ve got to solve that problem, pass a law to give the people working for us the ability to protect us.”

Lieberman, who is more closely aligned with the GOP than the Democrats he caucuses with on the war in Iraq and many national security issues and insisted Sunday that the surge in Iraq is working.

“You might say that, in Iraq, we’ve got the enemy on the run, but for some reason, in Washington, a lot of politicians are on the run to order a retreat by our troops even as they are beginning to succeed,” he said.

Lieberman stated it is not fair to conclude that he is more likely to endorse a Republican for president.

But he added that “so far I would say that Democratic candidates, in the larger questions of American security, have been disappointing, and I hope things will get better as this goes on.”


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: beseeingyou; bigbrother; govwatch; lieberman; privacy; privacyrights; securitycameras; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2007 5:34:19 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Way to go Joe.


2 posted on 07/01/2007 5:36:28 PM PDT by skimask ("Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated"....George Bernard Shaw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

gee. I knew he was going to flake out at some point.


3 posted on 07/01/2007 5:39:10 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Life is an episode of Green Acres. THEN you die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

For what, Joe? Those Illegals YOU voted to let become citizens?


4 posted on 07/01/2007 5:45:02 PM PDT by radar101 (Dream Team--Hunter&Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
“And of course, we can do it without compromising anybody’s real privacy.”

The cameras won't be placed near enough to abortion clinics to identify anyone going in.

5 posted on 07/01/2007 5:45:37 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (If you don't like rape, don't rape anyone. Don't push your morality on others!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
Amazing this guy was the psychos running mate.

"Forget terror for now like me and Bill did in the `90`s..What we must focus on is why it gets cold in the winter and hot in the summer. This phenomenon will destroy us all!"

6 posted on 07/01/2007 5:45:47 PM PDT by Screamname (On this date in history; Al Gore invents the Algorithm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
“I think it’s just common sense to do that here much more widely,”

And this guy is widely considered to be one of the finest "defenders of liberty" in the DemonRat party. Scary Times.

7 posted on 07/01/2007 5:46:38 PM PDT by Nova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
“That’s wrong. We’ve got to solve that problem, pass a law to give the people working for us the ability to protect us.”

I have a better idea: Pass a law that repeals all the laws that make it difficult for us to protect ourselves, you old socialist.

8 posted on 07/01/2007 5:47:09 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (If you don't like rape, don't rape anyone. Don't push your morality on others!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Hope they put several on those whackos in the Senate. And several extras on Pelosi’s office.


9 posted on 07/01/2007 5:49:33 PM PDT by Wheee The People (Go FRed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

If we simply deported the Muslims, we wouldn’t have a need for ANY of these repressive programs the internationalists feel are so necessary to their objectives.


10 posted on 07/01/2007 5:51:34 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

They work only to tag who did it.
Judge Posner is right er have to eavesdrop more and use our surveillance technology more and we have to keep these cases out of court and in secret tribunals or their will be worse attacks and more serious effects on all our civil liberties.
Here’s the UK’s Gordon Brown today:”• Gordon Brown raised the prospect of detaining suspects without charge for more than 28 days and allowing the use of phone-tap evidence in court”


11 posted on 07/01/2007 5:52:41 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

They are already in use where needed. Senselessly adding more is not necessarily an efficient or economical use of resources.


12 posted on 07/01/2007 5:54:43 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimask

Ok.

Instead of addressing the real issue, illegal immigrents, terrorism and lax borders...as well as a moral blindspot of multiculturalism ....he wants us all to be watched like criminals.

Every time I see a camera go up at an intersection, I shudder... and hope that some kid shoots it out.


13 posted on 07/01/2007 6:03:47 PM PDT by Chickensoup (If it is not permitted it is prohibited. Only the goverment can permit....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative
We don't need cameras. These people have already told us who they are. We need to round them up and put them someplace where they cannot harm the general population.

ML/NJ

14 posted on 07/01/2007 6:05:02 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

If al Qaeda ever fails to stop at a red light, we’ll have ‘em cold!


15 posted on 07/01/2007 6:08:58 PM PDT by Redbob (WWJBD -"What would Jack Bauer do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

For a wider use of cameras you should mount one on Teddie ( like an “in car cam” ) and let us see “all the action” of the Senate......


16 posted on 07/01/2007 6:17:50 PM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
If al Qaeda ever fails to stop at a red light, we’ll have ‘em cold!

Like when at least one of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers was stopped and had an expired visa or when visa renewal letters were sent out to some of them months after 9/11?

Why does it seem to me the federal government will be inept and incompetent when it comes to using these cameras for anything but collecting taxes and invading your privacy?

I don't fear Al Qaeda as much as I fear the federal government. Al Qaeda's killed a few thousand people. The federal government has enslaved about 300 million and made most of them happy about their bondage.

17 posted on 07/01/2007 6:17:53 PM PDT by MichiganConservative (If you don't like rape, don't rape anyone. Don't push your morality on others!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

“And of course, we can do it without compromising anybody’s real privacy.”

Yep. Sure you can. What a putz. Close the border. Find anyone remotely linked to an Islamofascist in our country (I can point you to the nearest Mosque for starters!) and kick them out of America.

Oh, but that would be too mean! We need to protect the liberties of those that want to kill us, while further eroding those of True-Blue Americans!

Yeesh.


18 posted on 07/01/2007 6:21:05 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

No thanks. Government has too much power already.


19 posted on 07/01/2007 6:22:49 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skimask
Way to go Joe.

Way to go?

This is the Lieberman...that just voted to give AMNESTY to 15-20 MILLION unknowns!!!

Oh sure...camera's will stop crime. Like laws will.

Get smarter.....

20 posted on 07/01/2007 6:24:03 PM PDT by Osage Orange (molon labe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson