Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Dispatches Two Battalions To Al Anbar In Emergency Move To Battle Al Qaeda
patdollard ^ | 6/29/07 | Pat Dollard

Posted on 06/30/2007 8:43:56 PM PDT by bnelson44

Breaking: U.S. Dispatches Two Battalions To Al Anbar In Emergency Move To Battle Al Qaeda’s Revenge Mission Against Sunni Tribes

You won’t find this story anywhere in the MSM. But my military sources in Baghdad and elsewhere have confirmed to me that 1. beginning yesterday, Thursday, July 28th, two U.S. battalions began moving into Al Anbar to hunt Al Qaeda members smuggled out of Baghdad through Fallujah and Ramadi, and 2. that Al Qaeda has launched not so much a military campaign to retake Al Anbar, but a revenge campaign against its Sunni denizens, and most specifically its denizens’ Sheiks, who routed them out of the province and into a few mixed Sunni/Shiite areas in and around Baghdad. Al Qaeda harbors the illusion that by kiling the Sheiks, it will be able to subjugate the entire Sunni population of the huge province, and govern it as a separte Al Qaeda Sharia state. This is a fool’s game. Al Qaeda doesn’t have the numbers to pull it off, and the only reason it thrived in Al Anbar in the first placeis because the locals gave them cover from the hunting U.S. forces, as well as other vital forms of support. But as often happens when one lacks many other options, Al Qaeda is throwing out logic and merely acting in revenge, and acting to chase an impossible dream. So far, a few more Sunni sheiks have been murdered since the hotel bombing. They will not last by making the Sunnis their enemies, because they ultimately lack the numbers and force to subjugate them. There will be bloodshed, but they can only lose.

Developing…

(Excerpt) Read more at patdollard.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: alanbar; alqaeda; alqaedainiraq; iraq; oif
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: hsalaw

That’s why we are protecting them and we are telling all of Iraq we are proteting them.


21 posted on 06/30/2007 10:20:05 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Unit is the great catch all word. When I am talking to my son and I don’t know what else to call a group of men he is with, I call it a unit and it works fine ;->


22 posted on 06/30/2007 10:21:13 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Right on! Back in the mid-90s when I was working this stuff, the Batallion was conceptually a unit that could be rapidly inserted into a geographic position, and fight for about 30 days independently. If you read between the lines, this “capability” is more than just soldiers. It includes logistics, planning, intel, etc... the whole package. The Batallion was the basic building block for mobility planning purposes. It looks like this concept has been supersized to the Brigade for some purposes now...


23 posted on 06/30/2007 10:32:35 PM PDT by coldoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: coldoc; hsalaw
Not every army in the world can split itself up into independent fighting units like this.

By the way, the Brigade Combat Team is the larger (3-5 combat battalions of different types, plus all support units) independent unit. BCTs can act completely independently for prolonged periods of time. Here is the website of the 3rd Heavy Brigade Combat Team

24 posted on 06/30/2007 10:43:13 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44

I saw one of those sheiks in Anbar say that Begdad would settle down, if Anbar was dealt with. Apparently the problems are related. In fact, it now sounds like Bagdad triouble comes from the surrounding areas.


25 posted on 06/30/2007 10:52:50 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44



26 posted on 06/30/2007 11:44:39 PM PDT by do the dhue (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I wont - George S. Patton Jr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44
July 28th?

I haven't celebrated July 4th yet!
27 posted on 07/01/2007 2:58:31 AM PDT by Beckwith (dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bnelson44; coldoc; 1COUNTER-MORTER-68; Grimmy

Thanks to all of you for the very useful information. What I’ve learned from this thread will help me better understand these reports from Iraq and Afghanistan. Off to church now. We pray for the safety of our troops, and for the success of their mission.


28 posted on 07/01/2007 8:03:33 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Make sure you read:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1859145/posts

So you know why they are fighting.


29 posted on 07/01/2007 8:05:05 AM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw; bnelson44

Formations have also tended to get a bit larger over the last 60 years or so. A World War II army division might be 10,000 or 11,000 men, now a division is likely to be closer to 13,000.


30 posted on 07/01/2007 8:38:02 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson