Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new enemy patrolling our east coast?
The American Thinker ^ | 6/25/2007 | A.M. Mora y León

Posted on 06/26/2007 5:39:45 AM PDT by cll

Is Puerto Rico really a part of the United States? And if it is, is it worth defending from attack? That's the emerging issue right now because Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez has just made his first threat on the U.S . commonwealth as he seeks to acquire advanced submarines.

Chavez is heading to Russia in the next few days, to discuss the purchase of five kilo-class submarines, and possibly four more advanced amur-class subs. There are questions as to how he would be able to finance them as well as how obtain the advanced training to bring them online, but there is no question from his statments that he wants them. Saturday, he laid it all out as AFP reported:

"They're making all this noise because Venezuela is going to buy some submarines. And I told them, 'Why not?'" Chavez said without confirming or denying the rumor.

"We've got half a million square kilometers of (Caribbean) sea, to the north, we've got Puerto Rico, in other words the empire (as he calls the United States), and France in the western Caribbean islands. We've got a huge sea," he said apparently alluding the use to which Venezuela's submarines would be put.

If Chavez succeeds in getting his hands on these submarines, the broad picture is that he will have the biggest submarine force in South America, bigger than Brazil, Argentina or Colombia, with a patrol range extending from Halifax, Canada to Montevideo, Uruguay. He will be in a position to patrol the entire Gulf of Mexico out of U.S. naval surveillance unless the battery-operated submarines surface for air, something they only need to do once a day, in the case of the Kilo-class subs and perhaps less with the more advanced models. The only way to monitor their moves will be to catch them exiting ports, a difficult task.

What's most disturbing is not the range, though, but that Chavez seems to want explicitly to direct them at Puerto Rico and France's two Overseas Departments of Martinique and Guadaloupe, both of which, in U.S . terms, have the status of states.

Although there are many islands in the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf Of Mexico, and many colonial powers, it's significant that Chavez alluded to the U.S.'s and France's prime presences there. In the past he's threatened Netherlands and its overseas territories, and he's always hated Britain, but now he seems to have singled out France. While Chavez's antipathy to the U.S. is well-known, what's less well-known is that France's new president, Nicolas Sarkozy, has an interest in the region and a clear understanding about Chavez. He's stepped up his ties to Venezuela's battered neighbor, Colombia, and probably will become more active in the region as Chavez's aggression steps up. Chavez knows this, and wants to throw out a few threat to France and the U.S. now.

Chavez's threats against the U.S. (and France) signal a first shot in a new level of confrontation with the West. Gone are the days of his devil speeches, he now seems to want to only communicate through weaponry and offering explicit plans as to how he intends to use them - starting with Puerto Rico. We better be paying attention.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: chavez; puertorico; southcom; venezuela
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: cll

Well, you know how to sink a Russian submarine, don’t you?
Put it in water.


21 posted on 06/26/2007 6:47:38 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

lol


22 posted on 06/26/2007 6:51:13 AM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cll

I don’t know who’s crazier, Ahmednutjob or Hugo Chavez. Has anyone paged Nicolas Sarkozy to the white courtesy phone yet?

The problem is nut jobs with a martyr complex. They can cause all kinds of mischief...


23 posted on 06/26/2007 7:11:03 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (Head Caterer for the FIRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton

You don’t need a sub to do that.

And sinking a tanker is not as easy as it sounds.

Besides, few tankers use the canal anymore. It’s too small.


24 posted on 06/26/2007 7:12:01 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Diversity in theory is the enemy of diversity in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Only an unknowing moron would think that.

Possibly a decent description of Chavez.

25 posted on 06/26/2007 7:13:37 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Diversity in theory is the enemy of diversity in practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
You don’t need a sub to do that. And sinking a tanker is not as easy as it sounds. Besides, few tankers use the canal anymore. It’s too small.

Then a freighter maybe. But the fact remains, a hostile sub in the Caribbean would throw the entire area into chaos. Not forever, but long enough to provoke a major international incident and tank the stock markets.

26 posted on 06/26/2007 7:25:14 AM PDT by Kenton (All vices in moderation. I don't want to overdo any but I don't want to skip any either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

“That being said, if he thinks he can seize Martinique, the French will had him his head like the UK treated the Argentine junta in the Falklands.”

You’re assuming the French have something the British do ... cojones. Come on get real. The French battle flag is a white cloth tied to a stick for crying out loud...


27 posted on 06/26/2007 8:02:30 AM PDT by Sir Hailstone (Graduate of the Archie Bunker School of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
He wouldn't dare. China owns the Panama Canal.

As for buying submarines...let the jerk buy all he can afford. Each one is a Navy Cross waiting to happen for some deserving USN skipper.

28 posted on 06/26/2007 8:11:01 AM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kenton; Sherman Logan

“a hostile sub in the Caribbean would throw the entire area into chaos”

It would at least ruin my yearly southern/eastern Caribbean cruise...


29 posted on 06/26/2007 8:11:34 AM PDT by cll (Carthage must be destroyed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sir Hailstone
You’re assuming the French have something the British do ... cojones. Come on get real. The French battle flag is a white cloth tied to a stick for crying out loud...

The French are as tough as the British. The French special forces compare quite favorably with US, UK, Israeli and Australian special forces.

The difference is this: the US, UK and Aussies are willing to risk their lives for the good of the whole world - they will go into battle on principle to defend freedom.

The French only go into battle to defend their monetary interests and their own territory.

The French do not care about world opinion in general and do not care at all when these issues are at stake.

Despite international opprobrium, the French conducted nuclear tests in the South Pacific.

The French sent in their special forces to take control of the nation of Cote d'Ivoire.

The French blew up a Greenpeace vessel solely because they believed it posed a risk of espionage.

The French have zero problem projecting force when the mood strikes them. They may have been no match for the Wehrmacht, but they can more than handle the Venezuelan Navy.

If Chavez moves against Martinique it will enrage the majority of the French public. France has an aircraft carrier, the US will definitely give Sarkozy a blessing to use it in the Caribbean, and it is precisely the kind of intervention which the French approve of and which will help Sarkozy in the polls.

30 posted on 06/26/2007 8:20:10 AM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cll
The only way to monitor their moves will be to catch them exiting ports,

Hardly. If Hugo starts any crap that ocean will have several new artifical reefs courtesy of US Navy.

L

31 posted on 06/26/2007 8:22:41 AM PDT by Lurker (Comparing moderate islam to extremist islam is like comparing small pox to ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: cll; Squantos; Travis McGee

So he buys subs, where does he get the bubbleheads to run it?


33 posted on 06/26/2007 8:26:48 AM PDT by razorback-bert (Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Venezuela makes claims to some other islands too I believe.

Tho’ they’re quite dated now, my friends and I used to play the heck out of all the numbered “Fleet” games by Victory Games.

IIRC the Carribean scenarios, gaining a marginal victory on points by staying aloat for more than a week was about all that the p*ssant powers could do and that was when they were rolling the dice well.
That was also assuming that the US was extremely busy elsewhere in the world fighting one and a half to two wars at once.

Course those games were based on the near 600 ship Navy we had back then too...

Great games, very intense, especially the North Atlantic ones, defending the GIUK gaps against Soviet sub surges from their Far North, trying to maintain a CAP line against Backfire attacks on our convoys, taking the 2nd Fleet into the Barents to attack the Bear in his lair (like getting naked, smearing your self with honey and standing under a bee’s nest doing the pinata thing!).


34 posted on 06/26/2007 9:22:38 AM PDT by skepsel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sir Hailstone
"Come on get real. The French battle flag is a white cloth tied to a stick for crying out loud..."

Somehow, I think the Foreign Legionaires serving in nearby Guyana would tend to disagree with you...


35 posted on 06/26/2007 9:30:05 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

The French Foreign Legion has never in their history won a single battle against an opposing military force.
Instead they celebrate their most glorious defeats.


36 posted on 06/26/2007 9:50:00 AM PDT by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cll

Let’s get real, here. Venezuela has no real submariner tradition, they have no trained crews, no infrastructure to handle the beasts, and no where to get parts except from overseas.

It won’t be long before these shiny new submarines resemble Iran’s F-14’s.


37 posted on 06/26/2007 10:01:22 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Hailstone
When you buy Citgo fuel or some of his “reduced price” Citgo home heating oil - THIS IS WHAT YOU SUPPORT!!

I always buy ABC fuel - Anything But Citgo!

I think they are always a penny or 2 cheaper because they stole the energy infrastructure from private companies and aren't saddled with such 'development' costs.

When you buy from them you are feeding the enemy.

"Don't feed the mouth that bites you".

38 posted on 06/26/2007 10:11:21 AM PDT by bankwalker (In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BuffaloJack
"Instead they celebrate their most glorious defeats."

Technically correct, but I'm guessing you're aware that their mission is, and historically has been, somewhat different than that of conventional units. One of the primary reasons they recruited foreigners was for those dirty little operations in colonial holdings so the French could apply pressure without worrying about the outcry at home over the spilt blood of Frenchmen. They are largely by design, expendable.

The FFL is not unique in, "celebrating glorious defeats." Remember the Alamo? (or Pearl Harbor, or Thermopylae, or...)

39 posted on 06/26/2007 10:18:14 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot

I think D/E subs pose a very great threat, be they from Iran or Venezuela.
From a US Navy Captain.....

Like many other major issues facing today’s Navy, our current concerns about ASW trace back to the end of the Cold War and our subsequent redirection of emphasis toward potential conflict in the littorals. Our existing ASW capabilities are largely those that had been so painstakingly created to prevail over the Soviets in a global, deep-water conflict, and they are only partially adequate for the new and different environments we face today.
Shallow water, near-shore oceanographic phenomena, asymmetric diesel and advanced Air-Independent Propulsion (AIP) submarine threats, and meager information about the potential battle space all contribute to significant uncertainties about our ability to contain the new and different undersea threat we face now.....

...we are no longer seriously challenged at sea, except perhaps by local naval powers intent on acquiring modern submarine forces or new mine warfare capabilities. Consequently, we have not been able to practice ASW very realistically.
Also, although our equipment has grown older and less effective, we have not noticed much impact, because the challenge has been so minimal. Nevertheless, the Navy’s ASW proficiency has declined in the last decade, and we must reassess future requirements and capabilities to meet an uncertain but still-dangerous threat.....


40 posted on 06/26/2007 11:03:58 AM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson