Skip to comments.
'Law & Order' And Lobbying (Thompson Defends "Burning Necklace" Aristide)
Politico ^
| April 2, 2007
| Fred P. Vogel
Posted on 06/25/2007 7:27:14 AM PDT by Austin Willard Wright
These sections are particularly interesting:
Over about two decades of lobbying (during which he also acted and practiced law), Thompson made nearly $1.3 million and represented clients including a British reinsurance company facing billions of dollars in asbestos claims, Canadian-owned cable companies, and deposed Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, according to government documents and media accounts from his first run for the Senate in 1994
Thompson did file papers with the Justice Department to represent Haitian President Aristide in October 1991, two weeks after Aristide was overthrown. The filing lists Thompson as a member of the Washington-based law firm Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn and says he intended to lobby Congress, the State Department and the White House "in order to obtain the restoration of the democratically elected government of the Republic of Haiti."
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aristide; smear; thompson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: Austin Willard Wright
Over about two decades of lobbying (during which he also acted and practiced law), Thompson made nearly $1.3 million My God! That' almost $65,000 per year! /sarcasm
2
posted on
06/25/2007 7:29:09 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Austin Willard Wright
oh- NOW the liberals hate Aristide...
Wasn’t it CLINTON who helped him get back into power?????
And isn’t there another presidential hopeful named Clinton???
3
posted on
06/25/2007 7:29:40 AM PDT
by
Mr. K
(Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Have you got your asbestos pajamas on? ;^)
4
posted on
06/25/2007 7:29:54 AM PDT
by
airborne
(Airborne - Ranger - Vietnam veteran! Duncan Hunter for President!)
To: Austin Willard Wright
That, however, was in a watershed Republican year, and it was before the Jack Abramoff scandal tarred lobbyists in the public's mind as corrupt, self-dealing influence peddlers. Yes, before Jack Abramoff, lobbyists were well respected as doers of the public good.
Sorry, whatever story is here is swamped by the authors cluelessness.
5
posted on
06/25/2007 7:30:58 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: airborne
Yes, I do but I better get on the next plane out of town just to be sure! It may be enlightening, however, to stick around and hear the various rationalizations of the Fred Heads, which will be something to the effect that Fred was “just following orders” or “that’s what lobbyists do.”
To: The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; Extremely Extreme Extremist; ...
To: Rodney King
My God! That' almost $65,000 per year! /sarcasm
For how many hours work?
8
posted on
06/25/2007 7:36:53 AM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Pretty disgusting for ANYBODY to support Aristide...
9
posted on
06/25/2007 7:38:39 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Looks like to me that the Muck Divers are not only diging in the Democrat Cesspool but in public records.
What is it about this story that dosen’t get me turned off to Thompson and turned on to Hellary Klinton.
Hellary scares the Hill out of me.
So do Republicans who speak ill of other (real) Republicans.
Oh I know!
Your say well Okiedoc you speak ill of McCaniac, Limply Gramnasty, Trench Lotto, Arlo Sphincter and others.
Well folks, for the record those sell out hypocrites are not Republicans but RINOS deserving of a swift kick in the sphincter muscle.
10
posted on
06/25/2007 7:40:22 AM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
To: OKIEDOC
What is it about this story that dosent get me turned off to Thompson and turned on to Hellary Klinton. Huh? Are you arguing that if you get "turned off" by Fred's support for Jean "Burning Necklace" Aristide that your only choice is to turn to Hitlary? Strange reasoning there. Oh....and "what is it?"
To: Austin Willard Wright
Hey...sound bite...you forgot this
"Corallo had a different take, asserting Thompson "didn't file papers to represent President Aristide. He filed papers to discuss the Haitian embargo." And Corallo said Thompson was not paid for his Haiti work, which consisted of a single telephone call to then-White House Chief of Staff John Sununu.
"That's the only thing he ever did on that. So that's that," Corallo said, adding that Thompson is no longer associated with Arent Fox or any other law or lobbying firm. "
I'm not a Fredhead (yet ), but if this is the best you've got, maybe I should look closer at Fred.
12
posted on
06/25/2007 7:45:56 AM PDT
by
stylin19a
(Since bad golf shots come in groups of 3, a 4th bad shot is the start of the next group of 3)
To: Little Ray
Corallo had a different take, asserting Thompson "didn't file papers to represent President Aristide. He filed papers to discuss the Haitian embargo." And Corallo said Thompson was not paid for his Haiti work, which consisted of a single telephone call to then-White House Chief of Staff John Sununu. "That's the only thing he ever did on that. So that's that," Corallo said, adding that Thompson is no longer associated with Arent Fox or any other law or lobbying firm.
Didja read the article? [The author didn't counter these comments by Corallo, BTW.]
13
posted on
06/25/2007 7:47:10 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
(Run, Fred, run!)
To: stylin19a
in order to obtain the restoration of the democratically elected government of the Republic of Haiti." You must have missed this part....but heh if you want to believe Fred's spin doctor, go for it.
To: Austin Willard Wright
Yes, I do but I better get on the next plane out of town just to be sure! It may be enlightening, however, to stick around and hear the various rationalizations of the Fred Heads, which will be something to the effect that Fred was just following orders or thats what lobbyists do. Lawyers represent bad people every day.
WTF do you think the "right to an attorney" would mean if they didn't?
That's what lawyers do, and the fact that you find it offensive labels you as intellectually challenged at best, and intellectually bankrupt at worst.
To: Austin Willard Wright
Your comments are just pathetic. I may download that script just so I can avoid your unfounded, inflammatory lies.
16
posted on
06/25/2007 7:48:47 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
(Run, Fred, run!)
To: Austin Willard Wright
Then, Willard, why didn’t the author give any refutation of the comments? He would, of course, if he could, right?
17
posted on
06/25/2007 7:50:11 AM PDT
by
Clara Lou
(Run, Fred, run!)
To: Clara Lou
Nor did Fred spin's doctor counter the part that Fred supporte "the restoration of the democratically elected government of the Republic of Haiti [Aristide]."
I don't see what that have to do with an embargo.
To: Austin Willard Wright
Politico is a DBM blog...
19
posted on
06/25/2007 7:51:07 AM PDT
by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: Clara Lou
Willard? Getting personal. Getting under your skin eh? Give my regards to Opie and Aunt Bea.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson