Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Inside Story Of What's Happening With The Immigration Bill
Rightwing News ^ | June 22, 2007 | John Hawkins

Posted on 06/22/2007 5:48:28 AM PDT by indcons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last
To: indcons
"He added that a lot of Republican Senators have been offended and embarrassed by their comments and are worried that the voters will lump them in with Graham and Lott."

Linseed Graham, “SHUT UP, you BIGOT!”

Trench Lott, “Turn yourself to SALT!”

21 posted on 06/22/2007 6:11:51 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

They are trying to use the summer to their advantage. With so many people on vacation and such in the next two weeks, the gang in Washington hopes to sneak this one through.


22 posted on 06/22/2007 6:12:12 AM PDT by Nextrush ( Chris Matthews Band: "I get high....I get high.....I get high.....McCain......")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Latest Zogby poll shows 3% popular support for the bill. I doubt you hear this on the old media networks.


23 posted on 06/22/2007 6:13:29 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Graham staked out his position on this because he thought that in the 08 election, he would be out of the Senate and in the McCain Administration as VP.

With McCain’s obvious decline in recent weeks, however, Graham may see the writing on the wall. His rants are out of desperation, as that giant sucking sound he hears is his Vice Presidency and very possibly his Senatorial career swishing around the opened drain.


24 posted on 06/22/2007 6:13:36 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Republican strategies got a lot done. Dems have nothing, so far.


25 posted on 06/22/2007 6:13:54 AM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Ted Kennedy has already pushed SEVEN amnesties into law. None was followed by a reduction in illegal immigration. Why should anybody believe this one will be? Pres. Bush and congress have had 6 years to enforce current immigration laws, build the fence that was voted on and funded, and nothing has been done.

Congress ordered exit and entry system in 1996 and … we still don’t have one. In fact, last fall [Secretary of Homeland Security] Michael Chertoff said building one would be cost prohibitive, it would cost billions of dollars and would take more than ten years. One of the things they are saying about this bill is, it is going to have an entry and exit system. They are lying to us again.

In 2002, there was a backlog of four million Green Card cases of “rampant and pervasive document fraud”, an increase of 50% over six years. “The staff is rewarded for timely handling of petitions,” rather than scrutiny on the merits. How is this going to happen now if suddenly they are inundated with 12 to 20 million applications…”

Congress and the Bush administration have used “subject to the availability of funds” to not fully implement the border security provisions of every bill they have passed and signed into law since 9/11.

The touch-back provisions that Sen. Hutchinson wants have nothing to do with slowing down illegal immigration in the future. The bill's actual provisions make no promises of lower illegal immigration and set no numerical reduction goals at all.

Most of the illegals here now do not want to become citizens, they want to remain citizens of their home country, but benefit from our social services, our tax dollars and our hard fought for way of life. How can anyone want to give legal status to criminals, gang members, fugitives, child molesters, rapists, etc. ?

Pres. Bush keeps saying this is to protect us, but these people are coming carrying diseases that we had wiped out years ago. I just don't trust congress or our government any more. They say one thing, but their actions don’t support their words. I’m fed up with this. Throwing money at it isn't the answer, actions are and there have been precious few of those. This bad bill will only be a magnet for more to cross the border. I am opposed to this bill from top to bottom, and there is no way they can spin it to change my mind.

26 posted on 06/22/2007 6:14:02 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

At the bottom of the article about how the bill died the first time is speculation about why Republican Senators might be supporting this stinker of a bill. One “reason” given was that Republicans would shore up the Hispanic vote forever.
I am shocked by this thinking. “Takers” always vote Democrat b/c that’s where Big Government lives. Are they nuts? Republicans getting the Hispanic vote? Is this really what this awful legislation is all about?


27 posted on 06/22/2007 6:16:02 AM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons

I am surprised about McConnel. He’s usually good across the board. He wants to throw Bush a bone, but if he lets this bill through I believe he’s toast, as Rep leader. The Pubbies will get trounced in ‘08, big time and I cant believe he wants to end it this way. Spit or get off the pot, Mitch!


28 posted on 06/22/2007 6:16:57 AM PDT by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

This article offered some needed clarity. There will be two big votes: the cloture vote, in which 60 votes are needed to invoke cloture and bring the bill to the floor, and the final vote approving the bill, which only requires a simple majority of 50 votes for it to pass. These people need to be leaned on to vote against cloture, first and foremost, because their “no” vote will count for less when only a majority is needed to pass the bill. I believe the Dems have the votes to pass the bill on the final vote. DEMAND THAT THEY VOTE AGAINST CLOTURE.


29 posted on 06/22/2007 6:18:01 AM PDT by 3AngelaD (They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Who’d a thunk it, when they were taking history or civics class in high school, that members of the United States Senate would be plotting to find a way to SHUT OFF DEBATE about an important subject.

Cripes, Reagan got them to tear down the wall, and we’re turning into them!!

Truly a sad outcome.

What’s next? If you want to debate something they just send in the SS and shoot you?


30 posted on 06/22/2007 6:18:28 AM PDT by djf (Bush's legacy: Way more worried about Iraqs borders than our own!!! A once great nation... sad...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Any thoughts on when these votes might come up? Are we talking today? next week, on the 4th of July during the fireworks display so no one will notice...?


31 posted on 06/22/2007 6:21:38 AM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

Graham deserves getting himself into a mess for listening to a drunken Kennedy telling him to quickly grab the turd by the clean end.


32 posted on 06/22/2007 6:21:41 AM PDT by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: YellowRoseofTx

Ted Kennedy’s whole constituency are the people that came here illegally that he got citizenship for.

Almost as bad as the late Minnesota politician Bruce Vento who sponsored wave after wave of SE asians and settled them in his district to ensure his lock on the Office.


33 posted on 06/22/2007 6:26:34 AM PDT by WBL 1952
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: EndWelfareToday

Repeal the 17th amendment...go back to the way the constitution was before, and have senators appointed by the state legislatures....


34 posted on 06/22/2007 6:28:17 AM PDT by joe fonebone (Nothin' from Nothin' leaves Nothin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski; 3AngelaD

No idea...Angela might know. Pinging her.

You might well be right about the July 4th date. While the rest of us are watching the fireworks, the Senate might well be preparing to set some off inside that building.

I am hopeful though. This bill might not get past cloture. They tried to ramrod it through the first time around but are under tremendous public pressure now.

Bush and Rove are doing their best to twist arms. I understand that they are threatening to withold RNC money from recaltricant senators.


35 posted on 06/22/2007 6:29:19 AM PDT by indcons (Bush, Lott, Martinez, et al. - the LaRaza wing of the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
Has anyone else noticed that when the pubbies were in charge, all that had to happen for a filibuster to stop a bill was for the dems to announce it, yet with the dems in charge, actual votes are taken for cloture?

Not only that, but when Republicans were in charge, there was always a statement made available by the MSM from the minority dems. Now, we still see the dems making their statements on the sNews shows but nary a peep from Republican opponents. One might get the idea the MSM has a (yellow) dog in this fight.

36 posted on 06/22/2007 6:30:28 AM PDT by Nomorjer Kinov (If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: indcons
I understand that they are threatening to withhold RNC money from recaltricant senators.

Ha! The irony of that is that as long as this bill is alive, there IS NO RNC MONEY!

37 posted on 06/22/2007 6:32:42 AM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: indcons
This was posted to me on another thread:

I finally broke through the word game some senators are playing, especially Kay Hutchison (my senator). For weeks, her administrative assistants have been saying "she is against amnesty." Good.

But, wait. When I pushed back firmly yesterday to ask whether the so-called "touch-back" meant the bill didn't offer amnesty, the assistant agreed that returning to one's home country first meant S1348 was NOT amnesty and that would be the reason KBH could vote for it!!! Can you believe this?

It may be argued that the 'touch-back' provision may be 'satisfied' with a visit to a foreign embassy located WITHIN the continental USA. Such embassy premises are considered FOREIGN SOIL.

In other words, not even a real touch-back at all. STOP THIS ZOMBIE SHILL BILL NOW!

38 posted on 06/22/2007 6:32:52 AM PDT by YellowRoseofTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
I don’t trust Hutchenson on this at all. If they bribe her by including her touch back provision in the bill she will vote “yes” on cloture, which will let the bill come up for an final vote which, as the article states will pass. She will vote “no” on the final ... but the bill will pass. Watch her and Isakson and Chambliss on the cloture votes!!! The only way to kill this bill is to defeat cloture!
39 posted on 06/22/2007 6:37:14 AM PDT by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Yes, I have.

This is one of the things that disgusts me so much about the Republican congress and the party in general.

I have asked myself over the past ten years why they don’t fight the “enemy”. I have only recently understood that they ARE the enemy.


40 posted on 06/22/2007 6:39:21 AM PDT by EEDUDE (The more I know, the less I understand...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson