Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How I Rethought Immigration: One Man's Confessions
American Enterprise Institute ^ | June 8, 2007 | David Frum

Posted on 06/18/2007 8:38:12 PM PDT by Delacon

I also began to learn that you could hardly name a social problem without discovering that immigration was aggravating it to the point of unsolvability.

Health insurance? Immigrants accounted for about one-quarter of the uninsured in the early 1990s, and about one-third of the increase in the uninsured population at that time.

Social spending? The Urban Institute estimated in 1994 that educating the children of illegal aliens cost the State of California almost $1.5 billion per year.

Wage pressure on the less-skilled? The wages of less-skilled Americans had come under ferocious pressure since 1970. How could you even begin to think about this issue without recognizing the huge immigration-driven increase in the supply of unskilled labor over the same period?

Competitiveness? How could the U.S. remain the world's most productive nation while simultaneously remixing its population to increase dramatically the proportion of poorly educated people within it?

A 1997 study by the National Academy of Sciences found virtually zero net benefit to the U.S. economy from immigration. Immigration yielded benefits, true--but also costs in the form of lower wages and higher social-welfare burdens. Balance costs and benefits against each other, as a rational policymaker should, and you arrived at a favorable balance of $10 billion, less than a tenth of a percentage point in a $12 trillion economy.

And this favorable balance was composed in a way that would normally disturb a rational policymaker: The largest share of the benefits went to the immigrants themselves, and almost all of the rest to people at the top of society. Almost all of the costs were borne by people at the bottom.

(Excerpt) Read more at aei.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; bush; davidfrum; frum; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; noamnestyforillegals; paleos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last
To: rockabyebaby

Well, they have to come home, sooner or later........... : )


61 posted on 06/19/2007 11:58:35 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

After this fiasco, I’m thinking later than sooner!


62 posted on 06/19/2007 12:01:31 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (HEY JORGE, SHUT UP AND BUILD THE BLEEPING FENCE, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: rockabyebaby

We have a vat of tar, and chicken feathers waiting for Kyl.


63 posted on 06/19/2007 12:06:55 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Senate Proposal is Full of Holes Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) has been a stalwart proponent of curbing illegal immigration and reforming the legal immigration apparatus in a truly meaningful manner. To that end, on June 4, in the middle of the first round of floor debate on the so-called “grand bargain” immigration bill, Sen. Sessions issued a press releaselisting egregious loopholes in the proposal, including “flaws effecting border security, chain-migration and assimilation policies.” In prefacing the list, Sen. Sessions indicated that he is “deeply concerned about the numerous loopholes found in this legislation,” which he sees as “more than technical errors, but rather symptoms of a fundamentally flawed piece of legislation that stands no chance of actually fixing our broken immigration system.” Furthermore, Sen. Sessions said, “Many of the loopholes are indicative of a desire not to have the system work.”

Flaw No. 1: Sen. Sessions pointed to perhaps the biggest flaw by noting that the “ ‘enforcement trigger’ fails to require the U.S. VISIT system – the biometric border check-in/check-out system established by Congress in 1996, but never implemented – to be fully functioning before new worker or amnesty programs begin. Without the system in place, the U.S. has no method of ensuring that workers and their families do not overstay their visas.”

Flaw No. 2: While most Americans tell pollsters they want less immigration, this bill dramatically increases overall immigration. It TRIPLES chain migration through the year 2016 – all the while sanctioning a mass importation of low-skill foreign workers and, by extension, a mass importation of poverty into this country.

Flaw No. 3: Illegal aliens get “legal status before enforcement” begins;

Flaw No. 4: The “triggers” require “no more agents, beds, or fencing than current law” mandates;

Flaw No. 5: The completion of background checks, including checks against criminal and terrorist databases, is “not required for” the granting of amnesty (in this bill, it is referred to as “probationary status”);

Flaw No. 6: Criminals of all kinds – including gang members, some child molesters, and absconders (i.e., “aliens who have already had their day in court [and who are now] subject to…removal” [covering “more than 636,000 fugitives”]) are eligible for the bill’s mass amnesty;

Flaw No. 7: “Illegal aliens with terrorism connections are not barred from getting amnesty. An illegal alien seeking most immigration benefits must merely show ‘good moral character.’”

Flaw No. 8: Illegal aliens granted amnesty or guestworkers imported via the new “Y” “temporary worker” program can claim the Earned Income Tax Credit, which “will cost taxpayers billions in just 10 years”;

Flaw No. 9: “Affidavits from friends” are acceptable as evidence of satisfying requirements for amnesty, thus “invit[ing] fraud and more illegal immigration”;

Flaw No. 10: “In-state tuition and other higher education benefits…will be made available to current illegal aliens that are granted [amnesty], even if the same instate tuition rates are not offered to all U.S. citizens,” a violation of current Federal law, which “mandates that educational institutions give citizens the same postsecondary education benefits they offer to illegal aliens”;

Flaw No. 11: New visas are created for individuals who are prone to overstaying their period of authorized admission – namely, the new “parent” visa, which allows parents of citizens, and the spouses and children of new temporary workers, to visit a worker in the United States. Not only is this term “a misnomer, but also an invitation for high rates of visa overstays” because it “specifically allows the spouse and children of new temporary workers who intend to abandon their residence in a foreign country, to qualify to come to the U.S. to ‘visit.’” To obtain the visa, one must only post a $1,000 bond, “which will be forfeited when, not if, family members of new temporary workers decide to overstay their 30 day visit. Workers should travel to their home countries to visit their families, not the other way around”;

Flaw No. 12: To be granted amnesty, illegal aliens need not pay back income taxes;

Flaw No. 13: Social Security credits for work done while in the United States illegally will be granted to “[a]liens who came to the U.S. on legal visas, but overstayed their visas and have been working in the U.S. for years, as well as illegal aliens who apply for Z visa status but do not qualify”; and

Flaw No. 14: “The criminal fines an illegal alien is required to pay to receive amnesty are less than the bill’s criminal fines for paperwork violations committed by U.S. citizens, and can be paid by installment,” which means that “the fine for illegally entering, using false documents to work, [is] one-tenth the fine for a paperwork violation committed by a government official.”

64 posted on 06/19/2007 12:19:15 PM PDT by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: surely_you_jest

Please don’t get me wrong. For one, I’m the one who started this thread based on an article that is anti amnesty, and anti the senate bill. I am not excusing the President. I think what he is doing is wrong, wrong, wrong. I just think the President’s intentions are good. This is the same opinion as Hannity, Limbaugh and many other pundits have of the President regarding this bill. I do think that the President has allied himself with others whose intentions are way more nefarious. Those that want the bill to pad the democrats ranks. Those business interests that want to stop any enforcement legislation at the state level by granting amnesty to the illegals and those elites who don’t care if this bill makes the country go to hell in a handbasket just so longs as their hedges get trimmed. I’ll go on to say that where I think the President has crossed the line is in ignoring his base yet again. He might have tried to fly this bill and having seen the reaction from his base, quickly backed away. But no, he is still pushing it. For this, he should roundly be denounced.


65 posted on 06/19/2007 12:41:42 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Point taken. My apologies.


66 posted on 06/19/2007 1:00:53 PM PDT by surely_you_jest (I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts. - Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

That email list you made is great. Thank you.


67 posted on 06/19/2007 2:24:07 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
"“The backroom deal that produced this latest law epitomized decades of collusion between the two parties to suppress open discussion of this vital issue. This time, at last, the collusion failed. Democracy has erupted. I’m ready to make my voice heard. How about you?”

Treason--the sellout of the United States as a sovereign nation.

No use pretending it's anything else.

68 posted on 06/19/2007 5:39:12 PM PDT by Czar ( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: donna

Facts are stubborn things not to be ignored by the hyperbole of various parties. Neoconservatives and Paleoconservatives both play the victim and race cards.


69 posted on 06/19/2007 7:46:25 PM PDT by rmlew (Build a wall, attrit the illegals, end the anchor babies, Americanize Immigrants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Czar

I wish I could tell you that I think you’re wrong. Well, we all have our priorities. It would be nice if our ‘leaders’ didn’t lie to us about theirs.


70 posted on 06/19/2007 9:22:30 PM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
"The fundraising seems to be on automatic with a huge disconnect from reality."


It's not just fundraising.

"Redundant" and "inefficient" are the words for everything connected to DC.

71 posted on 06/19/2007 10:30:01 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

Thanks. If you post it then please send me a ping so I can read the replies. I haven’t posted an article but just replied to posts so far.

You do great work here.

Here is another list that has most of the returned emails of the top senate staffers removed:

Andrew_wilder@kyl.senate.gov, Angie_Lundberg@Chambliss.Senate.gov, Isaac_edwards@murkowski.senate.gov, Jackie_cottrell@roberts.senate.gov, Jennifer_lowe@coleman.senate.gov, Jennifer_olson@lgraham.senate.gov, Jennifer_swenson@roberts.senate.gov, Jordan_stark@hagel.senate.gov, Katie_norman@dole.senate.gov, Kenneth_flanz@crapo.senate.gov, Kevin_kelley@collins.senate.gov, Lindsay_mabry@chambliss.senate.gov, Margaret_mcphillips@cochran.senate.gov, Marybeth_carozza@collins.senate.gov, Natasha_hickman@burr.senate.gov, Ramona_mcgee@judiciary.senate.gov, Shellie_bressler@lugar.senate.gov, Stephen_higgins@judiciary.senate.gov, Wesley_denton@demint.senate.gov, aaron_saunders@stevens.senate.gov

al_garesche@dole.senate.gov, alan_hanson@sessions.senate.gov, alicia_peterson-clark@burr.senate.gov, alicia_peterson-petersonclark@burr.senate.gov, alicia_petersonclark@burr.senate.gov, aloysius_hogan@inhofe.senate.gov, andrea_jones@mccain.senate.gov, andrew_wilder@kyl.senate.gov, andy_fisher@lugar.senate.gov, angela_stewart@warner.senate.gov, angie_lundberg@Chambliss.Senate.gov, ann_begeman@mccain.senate.gov, ann_loomis@warner.senate.gov, anne_caldwell@shelby.senate.gov, annelaurie_waters@chambliss.senate.gov, barbara_riley@sununu.senate.gov, beth_pellett_levine@grassley.senate.gov, beth_stewart@gsmith.senate.gov, beto_cardenas@hutchison.senate.gov, bill_castle@hatch.senate.gov

billy_piper@mcconnell.senate.gov, blake_brickman@bunning.senate.gov, bret_bernhardt@demint.senate.gov, bret_boyles@lott.senate.gov, brian_hart@brownback.senate.gov, brian_klippenstein@bond.senate.gov, brian_robertson@brownback.senate.gov, brian_walsh@cornyn.senate.gov, brooke_roberts@craig.senate.gov, charles_campbell@sessions.senate.gov, charles_cogar@allard.senate.gov, charlie_harmon@chambliss.senate.gov, chip_roy@judiciary.senate.gov, chris_campbell@hatch.senate.gov, chris_gallegos@domenici.senate.gov, chris_geeslin@lugar.senate.gov, chris_paul@mccain.senate.gov, chris_paulitz@voinovich.senate.gov, chris_yianilos@warner.senate.gov, christopher_gahan@gregg.senate.gov

cindy_hayden@sessions.senate.gov, conrad_schatte@warner.senate.gov, courtney_boone@stevens.senate.gov, coy_knobel@enzi.senate.gov, dan_knezevic@gsmith.senate.gov, dan_whiting@craig.senate.gov, danielle_holland@murkowski.senate.gov, david_morgenstern@alexander.senate.gov, david_schwietert@thune.senate.gov, david_snepp@snowe.senate.gov, david_young@grassley.senate.gov, don_stewart@cornyn.senate.gov, don_tatro@ensign.senate.gov, donna_murray@murkowski.senate.gov, donnell@lugar.senate.gov, doug_dziak@voinovich.senate.gov, edward_hild@domenici.senate.gov, eileen_mcmenamin@mccain.senate.gov, elissa_davidson@collins.senate.gov, elizabeth_maier@kyl.senate.gov

elly_pickett@enzi.senate.gov, emily_christensen@bennett.senate.gov, emily_mathis@sessions.senate.gov, erin_rath@gregg.senate.gov, flip_mcconnaughey@enzi.senate.gov, geoff_embler@hutchison.senate.gov, george_callas@voinovich.senate.gov, george_lowe@stevens.senate.gov, ginny_worrest@snowe.senate.gov, glee_smith@isakson.senate.gov, glen_chambers@brownback.senate.gov, glenn_powell@inhofe.senate.gov, greg_gross@dole.senate.gov, heath_garrett@isakson.senate.gov, hugh_gamble@lott.senate.gov, isaac_edwards@murkowski.senate.gov, jace_johnson@hatch.senate.gov, jack_finn@ensign.senate.gov, jackie_cottrell@roberts.senate.gov, jake_ward@snowe.senate.gov

james_christoferson@hutchison.senate.gov, jamie_loftus@hutchison.senate.gov, jane_alonso@collins.senate.gov, jen_burita@collins.senate.gov, jen_olson@lgraham.senate.gov, jennifer_lowe@coleman.senate.gov, jennifer_olson@lgraham.senate.gov, jennifer_swenson@roberts.senate.gov, jenny_manley@cochran.senate.gov, jessica_ferguson@thune.senate.gov, jill_kozney@grassley.senate.gov, jim_sartucci@lott.senate.gov, joan_kirchner@isakson.senate.gov, joe_donoghue@mccain.senate.gov, joe_matal@judiciary.senate.gov, joel_digrado@vitter.senate.gov, joel_maiola@gregg.senate.gov, john_bonsell@inhofe.senate.gov, john_drogin@cornyn.senate, john_easton@gsmith.senate.gov

john_little@martinez.senate.gov, john_lopez@ensign.senate.gov, john_rankin@brownback.senate.gov, john_richter@snowe.senate.gov, john_ullyot@warner.senate.gov, jordan_stark@hagel.senate.gov, julie_adams@mcconnell.senate.gov, kara_smith@bond.senate.gov, karina_waller@stevens.senate.gov, katie_boyd@shelby.senate.gov, katie_norman@dole.senate.gov, ken_lundberg@martinez.senate.gov, kenneth_flanz@crapo.senate.gov, kevin_bishop@lgraham.senate.gov, kevin_kelley@collins.senate.gov, kim_dean@bunning.senate.gov, kolan_davis@grassley.senate.gov, kristin_pugh@murkowski.senate.gov, kyle_downey@thune.senate.gov, kyle_ruckert@vitter.senate.gov

laura_caudell@burr.senate.gov, laura_condeluci@allard.senate.gov, laura_friedel@shelby.senate.gov, laura_lefler@corker.senate.gov, lee_dunn@mccain.senate.gov, lee_pitts@alexander.senate.gov, leroy_coleman@coleman.senate.gov, llee_pitts@alexander.senate.gov, lori_prater@gsmith.senate.gov, lorianne_moss@coleman.senate.gov, louann_linehan@hagel.senate.gov, lucia_lebens@coleman.senate.gov, lucy_murfitt@kyl.senate.gov, m_zabel@thune.senate.gov, mac_abrams@vitter.senate.gov, marc_short@hutchison.senate.gov, margaret_mcphillips@cochran.senate.gov, margaret_wicker@cochran.senate.gov, mark_morrison@bennett.senate.gov, mark_williams@burr.senate.gov

marty_morris@lugar.senate.gov, marybeth_carozza@collins.senate.gov, maryjane_collipriest@bennett.senate.gov, matt_hoskins@demint.senate.gov, matthew_acock@hutchison.senate.gov, matthew_johnson@judiciary.senate.gov, matthew_zabel@thune.senate.gov, michael_brumas@sessions.senate.gov, michael_quiello@isakson.senate.gov, michael_zehr@martinez.senate.gov, mike_buttry@hagel.senate.gov, mike_reynard@bunning.senate.gov, mike_seyfert@roberts.senate.gov, mike_ware@craig.senate.gov, mitch_waldman@lott.senate.gov, molly_mueller@roberts.senate.gov, monty_philpot@chambliss.senate.gov, nancy_perkins@gregg.senate.gov, natasha_hickman@burr.senate.gov, nick_simpson@lott.senate.gov

pam_thiessen@ensign.senate.gov, patricia_knight@hatch.senate.gov, paul_collins@sununu.senate.gov, paul_kong@hagel.senate.gov, paul_palagyi@corker.senate.gov, pete_fischer@crapo.senate.gov, peter_carr@hatch.senate.gov, peter_fischer@crapo.senate.gov, peter_olson@cornyn.senate.gov, phil_park@voinovich.senate.gov, ramona_mcgee@judiciary.senate.gov, randi_reid@enzi.senate.gov, ray_krncevic@snowe.senate.gov, rc_hammond@gsmith.senate.gov, reilly@sununu.senate.gov, richard_fontaine@mccain.senate.gov, richard_perry@lgraham.senate.gov, rick_dearborn@sessions.senate.gov, rielly@sununu.senate.gov, rob_epplin@gsmith.senate.gov

robert_steurer@mcconnell.senate.gov, russ_thomasson@cornyn.senate.gov, ryan_meyers@dole.senate.gov, ryan_thompson@inhofe.senate.gov, sarah_little@roberts.senate.gov, scot_montrey@alexander.senate.gov, scott_hoeflich@specter.senate.gov, scott_raab@mcconnell.senate.gov, sean_conway@allard.senate.gov, seema_singh@judiciary.senate.gov, seema_singh@specter.senate.gov, shana_marchio@bond.senate.gov, shellie_bressler@lugar.senate.gov, staci_lancaster@crapo.senate.gov, stephen_higgins@judiciary.senate.gov, steve_abbott@collins.senate.gov, steve_bell@domenici.senate.gov, steve_taylor@hagel.senate.gov, steve_wymer@allard.senate.gov, steven_wackowski@stevens.senate.gov

susan_irby@lott.senate.gov, susan_wheeler@crapo.senate.gov, ta_hawks@cochran.senate.gov, tara_shaw@domenici.senate.gov, thomas_dower@specter.senate.gov, tim_glazewski@kyl.senate.gov, todd_womack@corker.senate.gov, tom_ingram@alexander.senate.gov, tom_steward@coleman.senate.gov, tom_stewart@coleman.senate.gov, tonya_newman@vitter.senate.gov, tory_mazzola@ensign.senate.gov, travis_jones@craig.senate.gov, wendy_fleming@vitter.senate.gov, wendy_gnehm@enzi.senate.gov, wes_hickman@lgraham.senate.gov, wesley_denton@demint.senate.gov


72 posted on 06/20/2007 11:36:04 PM PDT by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

bwhahahaha a 1997 study by the National Academy of Sciences found virtually ZEEEERO NET benefit to the U.S. economy from immigration?

ZEEERO?

as a card carryin lib/dem what do i say to this...?

i say POPPYCOCK.....

THEN

i say BALDERDASH

after which

KUMBAYA

what about the chillren NJ ?

What about the chillren?

the chillern i tell you....

plus aks not for whom the bells toll

BWhahahahahaah

i know none of this makes sense....

but hell as a lib silliness is my

stock in trade. nuttin matters except how i FEEEEEL

and right now im in a KUMBAYA state of mind ya know.

so ALL im sayin to you is ......keep on a payin them taxes.....

and anti iN nup....already

me and mine?

we like riddin in the wagon while youse guys PULL....the wagon

so in that sense we’r actually pullin for ya..

also...we aint gettin OUT anytime soon thats for sure

and might i add

KUMBAYA

SARC


73 posted on 06/20/2007 11:59:39 PM PDT by flat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Alas, today they have more than just a couple of powerful lobbyists.


74 posted on 06/21/2007 12:07:31 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: flat

A thinking lib would say “so what’s it matter then if it makes no difference”


75 posted on 06/21/2007 12:09:44 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Alas, today they have more than just a couple of powerful lobbyists.”

And a president and more than a few powerful republican senators. It is to weep.


76 posted on 06/21/2007 3:00:37 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

“Alas, today they have more than just a couple of powerful lobbyists.”

And a president and more than a few powerful republican senators. It is to weep.


77 posted on 06/21/2007 3:00:39 PM PDT by Delacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Out of this disaster, however, comes some hope. The national debate triggered by the Senate's catastrophic reform has accelerated the great rethinking of immigration on the part of many millions of Americans. The backroom deal that produced this latest law epitomized decades of collusion between the two parties to suppress open discussion of this vital issue. This time, at last, the collusion failed. Democracy has erupted. I'm ready to make my voice heard. How about you?

My voice:

It's time to END immigration for a while. End ALL of it, the legal as well as the illegal.

It's time to close up America - yes, CLOSE IT UP - and let those that are here legally assimilate.

It's time to IDENTIFY those who are here illegally, and DENY them the benefits that native-born and legally-naturalized American citizens are entitled to. If this means that millions on our soil will suffer, so be it. If they hurt, perhaps they'll consider going back to where they came from.

It's time to secure the borders, with a wall - not a "fence", but something more formidable. If that provokes Mexico, so be it. Just what do they intend to DO about it?

If that makes me a "racist", I will wear that moniker with pride. I just don't care what folks call me any more.

- John

78 posted on 06/21/2007 3:27:39 PM PDT by Fishrrman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson