Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay candidate loses Dallas mayoral election
The Washington Post ^ | June 16, 2007 | Reuters staff

Posted on 06/16/2007 9:00:44 PM PDT by Baladas

DALLAS (Reuters) - An openly gay candidate lost his bid on Saturday to become mayor of Dallas in a race that attracted wide attention because of his sexual orientation.

Councilman Ed Oakley lost to businessman Tom Leppert, who took 58 percent of the vote to Oakley's 42 percent, according to official returns. Oakley had the endorsement of the Democratic Party, while Leppert ran a nonpartisan campaign.

A victory by Oakley would have made him the first openly gay mayor of a major U.S. city, according to the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, a Washington-based gay rights group.

Neither candidate made an issue of Oakley's sexual orientation, although some outside groups did.

One conservative group mounted a phone campaign against Oakley, mostly on the grounds of his sexual orientation, while gay rights groups cheered his candidacy.

His candidacy in the runoff election helped dispel the image of Dallas as an archconservative oil city in the heart of the U.S. Bible belt. The ninth-most populous U.S. city has about 1.2 million residents.

"That image of Dallas is pretty dated. I would call it a moderate city now, certainly not liberal, but it is not the conservative icon of 30 years ago," said Cal Jillson, a political scientist at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

He noted the city's more cosmopolitan character, citing a growing Hispanic population and migration from other parts of the United States.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: dallas; dallasmayor; edoakley; electionresults; homosexuality; leppert; mayor
Notice WaPo claims the "gay" candidate lost, NOT who actually won.

Media bias? WHAT media bias?

1 posted on 06/16/2007 9:00:48 PM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas

bttt!


2 posted on 06/16/2007 9:06:06 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
I'm not a resident of Dallas, but I do live in the Dallas-Fort Worth media market.

Interestingly, I had no idea Ed Oakley was gay. Despite all the newspaper and talk radio attention to the contest itself, nobody ever mentioned Oakley's sexual persuasion. So far as I know, it wasn't an issue.

Thus, it appears to have been a much bigger deal in Washington than it was in Dallas.

Tells one where their priorities are...

3 posted on 06/16/2007 9:15:11 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

He was bent over in the agony of defeat.


4 posted on 06/16/2007 9:21:39 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Interestingly, I had no idea

You need to read the Observer, if you want something other than Chamber of Commerce style propaganda.

5 posted on 06/16/2007 9:26:33 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
The Observer isn't distributed over here, but I know what you're talking about.

The Observer would've considered Oakley's sexual orientation a major resume'-enhancement.

6 posted on 06/16/2007 9:36:54 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The MSM was pumping this guy up for weeks.


7 posted on 06/16/2007 9:39:03 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

http://www.dallasobserver.com/

Website isn’t as good since the yankees bought it from the folks in Phoenix.

Schutze’s columns are usually worth reading.


8 posted on 06/16/2007 9:51:48 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
Oakley had the endorsement of the Democratic Party, while Leppert ran a nonpartisan campaign.

Okay, so does that mean the Democrats lost but the Republicans didn't win?? Is this more libspeak masquerading as news reporting?

9 posted on 06/17/2007 12:14:12 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (Global warming? Hell, in Texas, we just call that "summer".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Hold those “End of the world predicts Mabel, this one aint over yet!”


10 posted on 06/17/2007 7:51:04 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (The Islamists plan to kill us.The Democrats and the ratmedia are helping them. Ft Dix proves it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson