Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A bill in Congress makes it a crime for pastors and churches to speak against homosexuality
American Family Association ^ | June 14, 2007 | AFA

Posted on 06/14/2007 7:44:49 PM PDT by Pinkbell

Dear Anonymous,

If pastors and other Christians don’t aggressively oppose a bill now in Congress, in the near future they will be subject to huge fines and prison terms if they say anything negative about homosexuality.

The proposed law would make it a crime to preach on Romans Chapter 1 or I Corinthians Chapter 6. Or even to discuss them in a Sunday School class. If churches and individuals want to keep the government from telling them what they can and cannot preach and teach about homosexuality, they better get involved now!

House bill H.R. 1592 and Senate bill S. 1105 would make negative statements concerning homosexuality, such as calling the practice of homosexuality a sin from the pulpit, a “hate crime” punishable by law. This dangerous legislation would take away your freedom of speech and your freedom of religion. Consider what has already happened:

A California lawsuit which is headed to the U.S. Supreme Court would make the use of the words “natural family,” “marriage” and “union of a man and a woman” a “hate speech” crime in government workplaces. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has already ruled in favor of the plaintiffs!

CNN and The Washington Post both reported that General Peter Pace, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was fired because he publicly expressed moral opposition to homosexual behavior. For the Alliance Defense Fund’s summary of this bill, click here.

Take Action We are looking for one million Americans willing to take a stand and not allow a small group of homosexual activists to take away our freedoms. Can we count on you? Click on the link below to sign our Petition to Congress in Defense of Religious Freedom.

Please forward this to others, especially your pastor, and ask them to get involved in protecting our freedoms of speech and religion. This threat to our religious freedoms is real!

Sign the Petition to Congress Today

If you think our efforts are worthy, would you please support us with a small gift? Thank you for caring enough to get involved.

Please help us get this information into the hands of as many people as possible by forwarding it to your family and friends.

Sincerely,

Donald E. Wildmon, Founder and Chairman American Family Association

P.S. Please forward this e-mail message to your family and friends!


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 110th; afa; gaystapo; homosexualagenda; hr1592; moralabsolutes; s1105
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Here is a link to sign the petition:

https://secure.afa.net/afa/activism/signpetition.asp?id=1680

1 posted on 06/14/2007 7:44:50 PM PDT by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Link that works:

https://secure.afa.net/afa/activism/signpetition.asp?id=1680


2 posted on 06/14/2007 7:45:18 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter for President in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

It has come to the point that morals will be dictated by the Feds. Isn’t that what Communism is all about?


3 posted on 06/14/2007 7:49:13 PM PDT by 353FMG (Some say it's a melting pot, others liken it to a pressure cooker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Another link that works: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1850495/posts?

(By the way: read the bills... try and find a reference to speech)

4 posted on 06/14/2007 7:49:13 PM PDT by alancarp (How many millions have to break a law before it's inconvenient to enforce?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Yet another attempt to limit my freedom while criminals flood our streets by way of an unsecure border. I will stand with my Christian brothers in defiance of this attack on ALL people of faith.


5 posted on 06/14/2007 7:50:37 PM PDT by BhaktaSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

are you kidding me???!! illegal to teach the BIBLE??!!!

WHAT THE HECK IS THIS COUNTRY COMING TO??


6 posted on 06/14/2007 7:51:05 PM PDT by annelizly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1850495/posts
7 posted on 06/14/2007 7:52:07 PM PDT by lowbridge ("The mainstream media IS the Democratic Party." - Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Fags are us....


8 posted on 06/14/2007 7:53:07 PM PDT by The Wizard (DemonRATS: enemies of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Proudly filled out the form.

Thank you for the alert.

Hey, sometimes truth isn’t pretty and hurts people feelings ... however there is NOTHING normal about homosexuality and it should never be a crime to state this in ANY forum.


9 posted on 06/14/2007 7:54:19 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: alancarp; lowbridge

Sorry. I recieved the email on my computer. I checked to see if this was posted. I should have checked better. If the mods wish to remove it, that would be ok.


10 posted on 06/14/2007 7:54:26 PM PDT by Pinkbell (Duncan Hunter for President in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard

You offend my cigarettes with that ugly term... /sarc


11 posted on 06/14/2007 7:55:32 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
12 posted on 06/14/2007 7:55:38 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

It would help to fight the bill if they were honest. It does not do this AT THIS TIME. However, by watching Canada & the EU, it is obvious this is the possible end result. That said, there are already hate crimes laws on the books. They are used only against whites and other currently espised groups.


13 posted on 06/14/2007 7:58:17 PM PDT by PghBaldy (Stop the ethnic cleansing of American citizens in the SW. Save America, Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera

I think they wish they had those bodies.


14 posted on 06/14/2007 7:58:27 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

It would seem that the government, prohibited from establishing religion, would, by defining the terms in which religion expressed the tenets of its faith, would effectually be “establishing” an acceptable variation or “State” version of religion. Of course no one is required to join and there would still be many religions so the establishment clause may not actually be the issue here but it’s close and obviously very dangerous thinking.


15 posted on 06/14/2007 8:00:27 PM PDT by n230099 (Calling an illegal an undocumented immigrant is like calling a drug dealer an unlicensed pharmacist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

They dance with glee at the prospect of this law being passed.


16 posted on 06/14/2007 8:04:06 PM PDT by Khepera (Do not remove by penalty of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

If this passes, then its time for a new revolution.


17 posted on 06/14/2007 8:05:08 PM PDT by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Did you actually read the bill? It didn’t say what the AFA claims it did.


18 posted on 06/14/2007 8:05:24 PM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I’m opposed to the bills in principle, but let’s be honest about the debate, they do not apply to speech.


19 posted on 06/14/2007 8:07:35 PM PDT by txroadkill ( http://iraqstar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
H. R. 1592 ←→IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES May 7, 2007 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AN ACT To provide Federal assistance to States, local jurisdictions, and Indian tribes to prosecute hate crimes, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the `Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2007'. SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF HATE CRIME. In this Act-- (1) the term `crime of violence' has the meaning given that term in section 16, title 18, United States Code; (2) the term `hate crime' has the meaning given such term in section 280003(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (28 U.S.C. 994 note); and (3) the term `local' means a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State. SEC. 3. SUPPORT FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS BY STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS. (a) Assistance Other Than Financial Assistance- (1) IN GENERAL- At the request of State, local, or Tribal law enforcement agency, the Attorney General may provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or any other form of assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that-- (A) constitutes a crime of violence; (B) constitutes a felony under the State, local, or Tribal laws; and (C) is motivated by prejudice based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim, or is a violation of the State, local, or Tribal hate crime laws. (2) PRIORITY- In providing assistance under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall give priority to crimes committed by offenders who have committed crimes in more than one State and to rural jurisdictions that have difficulty covering the extraordinary expenses relating to the investigation or prosecution of the crime. (b) Grants- (1) IN GENERAL- The Attorney General may award grants to State, local, and Indian law enforcement agencies for extraordinary expenses associated with the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. (2) OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS- In implementing the grant program under this subsection, the Office of Justice Programs shall work closely with grantees to ensure that the concerns and needs of all affected parties, including community groups and schools, colleges, and universities, are addressed through the local infrastructure developed under the grants. (3) APPLICATION- (A) IN GENERAL- Each State, local, and Indian law enforcement agency that desires a grant under this subsection shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by or containing such information as the Attorney General shall reasonably require. (B) DATE FOR SUBMISSION- Applications submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted during the 60-day period beginning on a date that the Attorney General shall prescribe. (C) REQUIREMENTS- A State, local, and Indian law enforcement agency applying for a grant under this subsection shall-- (i) describe the extraordinary purposes for which the grant is needed; (ii) certify that the State, local government, or Indian tribe lacks the resources necessary to investigate or prosecute the hate crime; (iii) demonstrate that, in developing a plan to implement the grant, the State, local, and Indian law enforcement agency has consulted and coordinated with nonprofit, nongovernmental violence recovery service programs that have experience in providing services to victims of hate crimes; and (iv) certify that any Federal funds received under this subsection will be used to supplement, not supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for activities funded under this subsection. (4) DEADLINE- An application for a grant under this subsection shall be approved or denied by the Attorney General not later than 30 business days after the date on which the Attorney General receives the application. (5) GRANT AMOUNT- A grant under this subsection shall not exceed $100,000 for any single jurisdiction in any 1-year period. (6) REPORT- Not later than December 31, 2008, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report describing the applications submitted for grants under this subsection, the award of such grants, and the purposes for which the grant amounts were expended. (7) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2008 and 2009. SEC. 4. GRANT PROGRAM. (a) Authority To Award Grants- The Office of Justice Programs of the Department of Justice may award grants, in accordance with such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe, to State, local, or Tribal programs designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles, including programs to train local law enforcement officers in identifying, investigating, prosecuting, and preventing hate crimes. (b) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section. SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO ASSIST STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT. There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Justice, including the Community Relations Service, for fiscal years 2008, 2009, and 2010 such sums as are necessary to increase the number of personnel to prevent and respond to alleged violations of section 249 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 7 of this Act. SEC. 6. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN HATE CRIME ACTS. (a) In General- Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: `Sec. 249. Hate crime acts `(a) In General- `(1) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person-- `(A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and `(B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if-- `(i) death results from the offense; or `(ii) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill. `(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY- `(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of any person-- `(i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and `(ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if-- `(I) death results from the offense; or `(II) the offense includes kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill. `(B) CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED- For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in this subparagraph are that-- `(i) the conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim-- `(I) across a State line or national border; or `(II) using a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce; `(ii) the defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A); `(iii) in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant employs a firearm, explosive or incendiary device, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or `(iv) the conduct described in subparagraph (A)-- `(I) interferes with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at the time of the conduct; or `(II) otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce. `(b) Certification Requirement- No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or any Assistant Attorney General specially designated by the Attorney General that-- `(1) such certifying individual has reasonable cause to believe that the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of any person was a motivating factor underlying the alleged conduct of the defendant; and `(2) such certifying individual has consulted with State or local law enforcement officials regarding the prosecution and determined that-- `(A) the State does not have jurisdiction or does not intend to exercise jurisdiction; `(B) the State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction; `(C) the State does not object to the Federal Government assuming jurisdiction; or `(D) the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence. `(c) Definitions- In this section-- `(1) the term `explosive or incendiary device' has the meaning given such term in section 232 of this title; `(2) the term `firearm' has the meaning given such term in section 921(a) of this title; and `(3) the term `gender identity' for the purposes of this chapter means actual or perceived gender-related characteristics. `(d) Rule of Evidence- In a prosecution for an offense under this section, evidence of expression or associations of the defendant may not be introduced as substantive evidence at trial, unless the evidence specifically relates to that offense. However, nothing in this section affects the rules of evidence governing impeachment of a witness.'. (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment- The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item: `249. Hate crime acts.'. SEC. 7. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Act, an amendment made by this Act, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act, the amendments made by this Act, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby. SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. Nothing in this Act, or the amendments made by this Act, shall be construed to prohibit any expressive conduct protected from legal prohibition by, or any activities protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses of, the First Amendment to the Constitution. Passed the House of Representatives May 3, 2007.
20 posted on 06/14/2007 8:08:59 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson