Posted on 06/13/2007 5:18:44 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Does Lindsey Graham truly believe that his highest calling as a senator is to work with the likes of Ted Kennedy? Apparently so, judging by the South Carolinian's statement on this morning's "Today." Meredith Vieira interviewed Graham, a staunch supporter of the president's immigration plan, during the show's first half-hour.
TODAY CO-HOST MEREDITH VIEIRA: When you went home recently you were at a GOP meeting and you got booed over immigration. There are a lot of people in a lot of states -- conservatives -- who think this bill is bad and they see this as a litmus test.Graham's statement is a perfect illustration of why so few senators ever get elected president. They become infatuated with process, with working with "my friend, the distinguished senator from the great state of" blah, blah, blah. Of course there are times when compromise is required. But, above all, senators are sent to Washington not to work with the other side but to fight for their principles. This is not a case of working with Ted Kennedy to do a "hard" thing -- it's working with him to do a bad thing.
SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM [R-S.C.]: Well here's what I believe. This is a bill that's a million per cent better than the current system. I mentioned working with Ted Kennedy and I got booed. The lady in your piece earlier said no compromise. I'm a Republican conservative who believes my country is at risk by not solving immigration. I'm a member of the United States Senate who believes it's my job to work with Democrats to do hard things. This is no longer about immigration. Can your Congress, can your Senate, come together to do things that one party can't do itself? I think the answer is yes.
Pandsey was elected before I moved to SC. But, truth be told, if I had lived here then I would probably have voted for him. I’ve been told by the natives that he was a pretty good Rep.
Your tag line rocks!
Is Lindsey about to jump to the Dem party?
I hope that there is a good conservatve lined up to run. Preferably one from Charleston.
Gotta be Tom Ravenel.
Tom Ravenel is a good candidate on paper, but he has only held his current office for a few months. He could be accused of office-shopping.
He could also make the argument that Graham has violated his oath of office and an emergency situation has compelled him to run in order to save our nation.
My my conservatives have grown in leaps and bounds if we're to believe Rasmussen's newest poll. ONLY 20% of Americans favor the Kennedy/McCain proposal, while 80% favor securing our borders, curtailing any future immigration and enforcing existing laws.
Just say NO to Amnesty!! Keep calling!! It’s NOT OVER!!
U.S. Senate switchboard: (202) 224-3121
U.S. House switchboard: (202) 225-3121
White House comments: (202) 456-1111
Find your House Rep.: http://www.house.gov/writerep
Find your US Senators: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
CALL! CALL! CALL! CALL! AND KEEP CALLING TILL THE LINES FRY!
WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! WRITE! TILL YOU RUN OUT OF INK IN YOUR PEN!
Bombard the Democrats as well, especially the ones that ran on an anti illegal immigration plank and the ones in marginal districts who could be vulnerable. keep pounding on them. This is a bipartisan issue not a Conservative or Liberal issue BUT AN AMERICAN issue.
Corrupt legislatures vs. people voting on feeeeeeeeeeelinnnnnnnnnngs. Six of one, half dozen of the other, but at least the states would have representation, in principle, if the 17th were repealed.
Careful there .. you just agreed with a troll :0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
Lindsey Ping