Skip to comments.
Fundamental Mormons seek recognition for polygamy
Reuters ^
| June 12, 2007
| Jason Szep
Posted on 06/12/2007 2:31:05 PM PDT by deaconjim
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
First we get same sex marriages, then group marriages, and soon we'll have people marrying animals.
1
posted on
06/12/2007 2:31:09 PM PDT
by
deaconjim
To: deaconjim
I saw this coming as soon as the gays started pushing for “marriage”. I’m surprised it hasn’t moved faster towards polygamy, especially up here in Canada.
2
posted on
06/12/2007 2:32:56 PM PDT
by
oakcon
To: deaconjim
Well, look at the source: al-Reuters. This is a “Romney is scary” article. Al-Reuters probably has no complaint whatever about the islamists’ polygamy practices.
3
posted on
06/12/2007 2:34:11 PM PDT
by
hsalaw
To: deaconjim
I’ve seen real polygamists on TV. The women are usually on the high side of three bills and ugly as hell.
4
posted on
06/12/2007 2:36:22 PM PDT
by
lesser_satan
(FRED THOMPSON '08)
To: deaconjim
There's no such thing as a "fundamentalist Mormon". There are ex-Mormons and never-been-Mormons. AFAIK, the great majority of the polygamists are in the second category.
Calling these polygamists "Mormons", of any stripe, is no more accurate than someone from Venezuela calling himself "American". It's just not true.
5
posted on
06/12/2007 2:37:15 PM PDT
by
TChris
(The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
To: hsalaw
I did note the reference to Romney, but I’m more concerned about the damage being done to society by the anything-goes crowd than I am about Romney’s campaign. Romney knew before hand what kind of problems his church could cause him, and he accepted the risk.
6
posted on
06/12/2007 2:37:54 PM PDT
by
deaconjim
(Because He lives...)
To: oakcon
Polygamy is forbidden by the Bible, Matthew 6:24 where it says "No man can serve two masters . . ."
But why is Romney even a keyword in this article? Ted Kennedy or Bill Clinton would be more appropriate since they were diddling with office staff while married.
7
posted on
06/12/2007 2:39:09 PM PDT
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: TChris
Calling these polygamists "Mormons", of any stripe, is no more accurate than someone from Venezuela calling himself "American". It's just not true.
Not to dispute the point you were making, but technically people from Venezuela are just as "American" as we are.
8
posted on
06/12/2007 2:40:46 PM PDT
by
deaconjim
(Because He lives...)
To: Vigilanteman
But why is Romney even a keyword in this article?
Only because he was mentioned by name in the article.
9
posted on
06/12/2007 2:41:54 PM PDT
by
deaconjim
(Because He lives...)
To: deaconjim
Jacob was a polygamist too. It's hardly the same as homosexual "marriage."
ML/NJ
10
posted on
06/12/2007 2:42:26 PM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: TChris
I would think as followers of Joseph Smith and the Book of Mormon that they possibly have as much right to it as you do.
Besides, they are following Mormonism the way it was taught by Brigham Young and Joseph Smith, and maintain that it was the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints who corrupted the “true” religion.
Which has more authority to claim themselves Mormon....LOL
11
posted on
06/12/2007 2:42:49 PM PDT
by
colorcountry
( We need to move away from the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. (Duncan Hunter))
To: Vigilanteman
Polygamy is forbidden by the Bible, Matthew 6:24 where it says "No man can serve two masters . . ." BWAHAHAAA!
Outstanding, VM.
12
posted on
06/12/2007 2:47:16 PM PDT
by
Enosh
(†)
To: deaconjim
>>>Romney knew before hand what kind of problems his church could cause him, and he accepted the risk<<<
Well, not really his church. That’s like saying being a Catholic is held against you because of what went on with the Inquisition. There’s not a single Mormon alive today whose polygamous marriage was graced with the church’s approval.
I guess you can say that there are those who hold the Inquisition against Catholics, but they’re only doing that because they’re looking for reasons to say that they hate Catholics.
To: TChris
Well....the elders in Salt Lake City better find a way to discourage the media from calling these nuts Mormons....even "fundamentalist Mormons"....
all most people hear is "Mormon"......the fundamentalist (lunatic) part does not compute.
Soon Mormons and Mohammedans will be the same in most people's mind....and it will be a "media delight"....
they (the media) are trying mightily
14
posted on
06/12/2007 2:50:00 PM PDT
by
B.O. Plenty
(Give war a chance...)
To: deaconjim
Not to dispute the point you were making, but technically people from Venezuela are just as "American" as we are. Not in the way the word is understood. That was the point I was making.
15
posted on
06/12/2007 2:53:14 PM PDT
by
TChris
(The Republican Party is merely the Democrat Party's "away" jersey - Vox Day)
To: deaconjim
How is they can call themselves Mormon when they live their lives against Mormon Doctrine?
They are like Catholics who support abortion.
16
posted on
06/12/2007 2:54:15 PM PDT
by
elizabetty
(Perpetual Candidate using campaign donations for your salary - Its a good gig if you can get it.)
To: oakcon
Polygamy is practiced and condoned by numerous and past cultures, sodomy is not. So why is the US freaking out over the prospect of polygamy and silent on the legalization of sodomy.
17
posted on
06/12/2007 2:55:10 PM PDT
by
Fee
( R)
To: deaconjim
Well I have to wonder which is worse. polygamy or homosexual marriage. I think I could tolerate the former before the latter.
18
posted on
06/12/2007 2:56:26 PM PDT
by
Khepera
(Do not remove by penalty of law!)
To: deaconjim
You are far closer than the slight sarcasm in your post would indicate!
Seriously - There are people out there pushing for “gay marriage”, not because they are gay, but because they know that no rule regarding who (or what) you can marry will be able to stand.
19
posted on
06/12/2007 2:56:56 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(I've got TWO QUESTIONS for you....)
To: deaconjim
20
posted on
06/12/2007 3:00:15 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(The DemocRAT party is the party of TREASON! Overthrow the terrorist's congress!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson