Posted on 06/09/2007 1:18:28 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
NEW YORK - The investigation into the thwarted plot to bomb Kennedy International Airport is widening beyond the four men in custody, with more suspects sought outside the U.S. for their suspected roles, a law enforcement official said Friday. Continues...
==============================================================
Liberals: Can we surrender to Trinidad now?
Regarding the plot to blow up New York's JFK airport, there's good news and bad news. The good news -- the plotters were caught. The bad news (for liberals) -- the plotters were caught. It's now five years and nine months of BusHitler's "incompetent" and "failed" 'Global Bumper Sticker On Terror' but there's still been no terrorist attack on U.S. soil -- leaving al-Qaeda and the Democrats feeling very frustrated these days.
Showing that he can be tough on terrorists, John Edwards swiftly responded to news of the plot by calling for shutting down Guantanamo. The Guantanamoron said the plot shows Bush is losing the war on bumper stickers. But in a hopeful sign, Chuck Schumer did not call for more gun control.
The plotters have names like Abdul Kadir, Kareem Ibrihim and Abdul Nur -- hmmmm, I wonder what religion they practice? Any ideas? It took the media only hours and hours after the story broke to admit (a) the 'suspects' had Muslim-sounding names and (b) the 'suspects' were Muslims. Wouldn't want to rush to conclusions. Could be those militant Presbyterians again -- you just never know.
The plotters planned to blow up the airport, kill thousands and bring down the U.S. economy -- a clear sign we should try harder to welcome these alien 'guest workers.' They were just doing the work Americans won't do. Actually, one of these lunatics happens to be a U.S. citizen -- 63-year-old Russell "Mohammed" Defreitas, who's apparently not among the "moderate" U.S. Muslims the Pew pollsters keep telling us exist. Liberals spent all last week touting the Pew poll as proving American Islam is brimming with 'moderates' because only one in four young U.S. Muslims want to murder all of us. Over 200,000 U.S. Muslims are cool with suicide bombing but liberals insist it's Wal-Mart we should get our pants soiled over.
One of the plotters -- Defreitas -- was caught on tape telling a federal informant that "to hit John F. Kennedy, wow! They love John F. Kennedy like he's the man. If you hit that, this whole country will be in mourning." If you hit that, it might even sway liberals to start backing the American side (yes, I realize this is far-fetched).
Liberals are usually big on multicultural breakthroughs -- Pelosi, First Woman Speaker Almost Picks First African-American to Head Intel Committee But Picks First Hispanic-American Instead. Oddly, there's nothing on The First Guyanese-American To Attempt To Bomb JFK To Smithereens. Why is that? Come to think of it, nothing either on The First Congressional-American Indicted For Stuffing Bribes in Refrigerator Because George Bush Is A Racist. This should be a proud milestone!
Bill Clinton got endless accolades in response to having no role in foiling the LAX millennial bomber (he was stopped by an alert customs agent), yet no sooner had the announcement about the foiled JFK plot been made (my stopwatch says 20 seconds) than liberals started making excuses and claiming the whole thing was a crock. Libbies complained that the plot to slaughter Americans was 'just' in the planning stages or hadn't 'advanced enough' and that authorities jumped the gun or took too long or moved in too quickly or surveilled too long (18 months!) and that the threat wasn't 'imminent' enough to justify making John Edwards, Democrock of North Carolina, look like a drooling moron again.
The plotters (1) had assembled as a cell, (2) formulated a plot, (3) used pictures, satellite images from Google Earth and their inside knowledge to identify targets and assess security, (4) flew to Trinidad and Guyana several times and used their connections to pitch their plot to Muslim terror leaders there, (5) were attempting to secure funding and explosives for the operation -- yes, you'd need a crystal ball to figure this out. Terrorism experts assure us that blowing up JFK's massive jet fuel supply pipeline and tanks would cause only limited damage and loss of life. No biggie. Minimal devastation. Would barely cripple the airlines. A chain explosion from blowing up one part of the system is highly unlikely. And a group of Muslims killing 3,000 Americans using box-cutters is highly unlikely.
Liberals see little threat from harmless Muslims wanting to shoot up Fort Dix or blow up the Sears Tower or JFK but insist on carefully examining the crotches of menacing elderly ladies in wheelchairs wanting to board a plane.
The New York Times even ran a story praising the humanitarian side of these JFK plotters because one of them balked at the idea of killing thousands of innocent people. He preferred hundreds.
The Times insisted these "men" were seen as 'devout' Muslims, had never "planned or carried out any previous attacks," had no prior criminal record and did not possess explosives. But enough about the 9/11 hijackers.
As to what made the plotters go bananas, John Murtha revealed it on ABC's This Week: It's the fighting in Iraq! "This is the kind of thing that is happening because of our troops in Iraq . . . Our presence in Iraq, our occupation in Iraq gives these people the inspiration . . . I'm absolutely convinced this is the kind of thing that inspires these people."
I'm absolutely convinced Murtha's an idiot. Defreitas himself told an informant in January that he first hatched the idea to hit JFK airport TEN YEARS AGO while working as cargo handler because he saw missiles being shipped to Israel through JFK. The missiles were secretly shipped by Blackwater agents dressed in Illuminati uniforms via Zionistical pipelines to supply Adolf Dumbya's future illegal war in the Joooooish state of Iraq!
Whether it's the foiled plot on the Brooklyn Bridge or the foiled Heathrow plot or the foiled Fort Dix plot or the foiled plot to bomb the Sears Tower or the foiled plot to flood lower Manhattan by bombing underwater train tunnels or the foiled plot to light up JFK, the big lesson in all this is that Bush's "failed" 'bumper sticker' war has succeeded to the point that the Jihad boys can't get beyond the planning stages before getting bagged by the feds. Which means every time a plot gets busted up, people who have no rational connection to reality -- meaning liberals -- reflexively reprise their beloved and hilariously lazy agitpoopery of September 10th -- feds overreacted, move on, nothing to see here, just trash talk by losers/amateurs/wannabees, plans weren't operational, entrapment, just hype, nothing to see here, no funding yet, no explosives, nothing to see here, move on, etc.
Had Mohamed Atta and the Atta boys been nabbed before their 'highly unlikely' mission, the reflex reaction from libbies would be the same. Hahahahahaha! Box-cutters? Thousands dead? Skyscrapers reduced to rubble -- how? Almighty box cutters? Cunning Wahabi goat herders with forceful right hook? No wait -- these are just students! Muslim students! Bigotry! Shows you Ashcroft has it in for the Muslim "race." Put a few liberals in the jury box and the 9/11 hijackers would walk. It's not that libbies have lapsed back to their bad wa-habits of September 10th. They never tried to quit.
In the JFK foiled plot, a chain explosion from blowing up a pipeline sounds far-fetched to the smart set, but if you read the indictment, what you get is a snapshot of a plot in the early planning stages that needed to work its way through all the gears and go through several rounds of revampment as the cell bags new info from further nosing around and surveillance -- all geared toward figuring out the boundaries of the possible, the goal being getting the highest body count and maximum damage possible. The Jihad boys give it a go only when the big bucks kick in and they've got their explosives (the last part of the preparations). Unfortunately for liberals, we'll never know how deadly the final plan would've been, thanks to Bush's failed bumper sticker! The smart set isn't so smart after all.
Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"
Have a great weekend, y’all — God bless.
They have yet to run a single story about the JFK plot in our local newspapers.
No terrorism around here. Nope, nope, nope, all made up by those evil Republicans.
Ya think?
You left out plenty of other idiots, though, like Ted Kennedy bootlicker Linny Graham standing before Reconquista Racist La Raza and calling the rest of us bigots. They want to destroy this country as badly as the Jihadists.
Pretty intense piece. You're not mad or anything, are you?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1843491/posts?page=395#395
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1843491/posts?page=396#396
For eight years during Clinton's presidency, they lied about, covered up, or downplayed every attack against us, such as TWA 800, Oklahoma City, first World Trade Center, USS Cole, and the Embassy bombings (see further THE CLINTON COVER-UP OF THE TERROR.)
Then, with the one exception of 9/11, for the last six years Bush has been successful in stopping attacks before they happen on our soil.
The sheeple just aren't going to get it. And the drive-by media sure is doing its best to make sure they don't get it.
Of course, if anyone of prominence notices this problem, the left immediately twists their words to sound like the poor guy was asking for an attack.
John, you mean I don’t have to do what Michael Bloomie says and get a life? Thanks for your wit and wisdom.
LOL, JH you just get better and better, thanks!
Bill Clinton got endless accolades in response to having no role in foiling the LAX millennial bomber.....John Edwards, Democrock of North Carolina, look like a drooling moron again.
Great work JH2, thanks for sharing.
Great! Hope you don’t mind that I put an excerpt on my blog.
John:
It is not just Murtha who blames the United States for these terrorist plots. It is fellow Republicans, like Ron Paul, who think it is more principled to allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon than it would be to launch an immoral pre-emptive strike.
There are those among us who would force us to absorb another hit rather than do what is distasteful and confront these animals on their own terms, something Bin Laden has said we would not be able to do.
Bump
Excellent read! Thanks... and add me to your ping list if you’ve got one..
The Times insisted these "men" were seen as 'devout' Muslims, had never "planned or carried out any previous attacks," had no prior criminal record and did not possess explosives. But enough about the 9/11 hijackers.
Excellent!!
*Sigh* Trinidad and Tobago are no threat to the United States, as they are also under attack from Islamic terrorists. 5% of the country is Muslim, and the plurality of the population is Christian. The rest are mainly Hindu and who are VERY anti-Muslim.
Please, don’t try to alienate an important partner in the War on Terror. Gas prices are bad enough as it is.
Great writing, John...you have a good weekend, too.
Thank you so much for this excellent wrap-up!
EXCELLENT, JH2!
Excellent...and wicked clever and funny!
Bumper sticker bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.